Profile of raw

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 644

General Information


Thread: Germans now completely Click 'n Win.16 Nov 2013, 08:37 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Nov 2013, 02:05 AMLichtbringer I don't think the starting post makes any sense or should be taken seriously or even with respect. On the one hand you shouldn't lower yourself onto the that level to respond, on the other hand the thread is already useless. How does it not make any sense to you? I'll rephrase: The game is more frustrating than fun to play, largely because of the poop balance. It's not even that one side or the other is OP here or there, the fundamental way the units/factions are being designed is wrong. Back in the day, units where designed for coolness and applicability. Now it's just some artist farting a model and someone keying in numbers into some excel table. And then the forums go into full riot mode, because tank A now has +5 B. Yeah, that will change things. Not. It's not even that Relic is doing that alone, SC2 has the EXACT SAME profound design issues. It's like someone wrote a specification. And it's garbage. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Germans now completely Click 'n Win.15 Nov 2013, 20:47 PM This game is bullshit. It won't go anywhere until Relic replaces whoever is responsible for Balance (if any). The grossest insult is that the balance patches, the patches in general, have nothing, NOTHING, to do with what is actually happening ingame. It's like balance has been outsourced to martians. I am out. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Unbalanced pay commanders15 Nov 2013, 19:04 PM 4-5 minute T70 sounds almost usable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How Coh2 sold out - and what to do about it15 Nov 2013, 19:03 PM The OP contains a lot of nonsense. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzer IV Command tank Buff9 Nov 2013, 14:14 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Nov 2013, 10:11 AMStrummingbird Health and armor-wise they are identical. The P4 command tank is faster, but it's gun is significantly inferior to that of the standard P4 vs armor. It's mediocre against infantry, somewhat better than the normal P4, but not especially good (esp. compared to the Ostwind or KV8). So you're paying more fuel and manpower for a 0.8 received damage modifier that only works on friendly territory and for much worse performance against vehicles than a normal P4 with a moderate anti-infantry buff. I haven't had the chance to use it much, but it seemed fairly unimpressive the last time I did. It doesn't dismantle infantry like the original P4 IST did, and I didn't notice the defensive aura really swinging any battles moreso than an additional Ostwind would have. I am fairly sure some developer here on the boards stated that those two tanks are actually identical stat-wise and just have different visuals, when this question popped up. But maybe this was in beta and in another universe. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Play9 Nov 2013, 09:01 AM If you're dying to T-70s you're doing something wrong, probably not getting Shrecks or PaKs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Panzer IV Command tank Buff9 Nov 2013, 08:59 AM PzIV and PzIV Command are identical, the higher fuel cost is due to their boosting ability. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: When there is too much random...9 Nov 2013, 08:58 AM Considering the value put into that single T-34, yes absolutely. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: P grens need durability buff9 Nov 2013, 08:56 AM This suggestion is just absurd. Does OP actually play the game? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Maxim + Zis Spam8 Nov 2013, 15:00 PM They do in my games. I haven't played a game without a MHT in a long time. In: COH2 Gameplay