Profile of PanzerGeneralForever

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 1072

General Information
Steam: 76561198060148756
Game Name: PanzerGeneralForever


Thread: Remove yellow cover bonuses from MOVING infantry14 Sep 2016, 20:31 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Sep 2016, 20:20 PMTheMachine Bad idea, That would make infantry combat even more static and buff LMG's even more since close combat infantry have a harder time charging up close. This only applies to yellow cover which becomes a problem in the late game for hmgs. This would encourage more use of smoke sprinting and flanking instead. Also I'm Wondering which lmgs are a problem? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Remove yellow cover bonuses from MOVING infantry14 Sep 2016, 20:18 PM Removing the RA bonuses from infantry that are moving would I think help solve some issues regarding the late game battle field. The Problem: In the late game there are yellow craters all over the map providing all infantry with a 25% RA bonus. What this does is make infantry that already have high RA bonuses even harder to hit, especially for vet 0 infantry and hmgs. For the axis most of their infantry excel at long range while the allied infantry excel at close range. This means most infantry engagements are determined by how soon the hmgs can suppress or how many models the axis player can take out before the allied player gets close. The solution: Make it easier for long range units to drop models on the move and hmgs to suppress by making their enemy easier to hit by removing the RA bonuses of yellow cover from moving infantry. Who benefits: -hmgs since they will be able to suppress their enemies sooner than later. -long range infantry How it will change gameplay: It will encourage more flanking, use of smoke, and sprint abilities for units that excel at close range. Tell me what you guys think. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: P.G.s a suggestion for a new vet 1 ability. 14 Sep 2016, 19:05 PM I like the idea of giving pgrens a critical repair ability at vet 1. It relates panzer grenadiers to their panzers. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: What's left to fix to have a fairly balanced game? 13 Sep 2016, 23:32 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2016, 23:20 PMStug life Here is my take : 8- Cromwell yes, m10 no Uh you do understand that without using warspeed the M10 has better crushing abilities than the cromwell. Cromwell acceleration: 2.6 M10 acceleration: 3.2 All other movement stats are the same. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What's left to fix to have a fairly balanced game? 13 Sep 2016, 22:47 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2016, 22:40 PMThe amazing Chandler So is the 222 and the T70 (fragile) like they suppose to be. In the hand of a good player, the Flame halftrack is very deadly. Maybe a little to deadly. As i said, a little i use it a lot since it forces the allies to either side tech or get a very expensive atg. The axis have similar problems with aec t70 stuart aaht etc. i think its in a good spot right now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What's left to fix to have a fairly balanced game? 13 Sep 2016, 21:54 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2016, 21:12 PMTobis They've got most of the non-doctrinal units in a good spot now, with only some minor changes required to specific units. (and major change needed on USF mortar) Underpowered/Underused units in no particular order: - Ostheer Ostwind - m8 Scott - british nades - Churchill - AT emplacement - Flak-HT - ISG(smoke) I think these are probably obviously underperforming units that most people would agree need changes. There are plenty of other units that that people could pick out to be changed, but atleast they are fairly functional. Except for the ISG, these units are pretty much never seen, which is sad for non-doctrinal units. Once those are done they can start working on the doctrinal stuff, but there is too much to name. There is nothing wrong with mill bombs(British based). Id also argue the Churchill is fine as well. The only reason we don't see it is due to the fact comet is miles better. Other than mill bombs and Churchill I agree with your list. In addition: -Yellow cover only applies to stationary units. This will increase the effectiveness of hmgs since it'll suppress and pin yolo blobs much better. It will also allow the axis infantry to drop more enemy models before they can close in. - 4 man squads need more spacing between models. - no double lmgs. - for indirect fire, decrease effectiveness of auto fire but decrease setup and take down time. Maybe buff barrage. - ost panther needs better moving accuracy. - Cons get DP upgrade - decrease calliopes health to 480 (3 atg shots) - change Stuart stun ability. - increase cost of 222 slightly and fix coaxial mg bug on it. - comet: pick one A. Less range B. Less speed C. Less armor D. Less effective vs infantry This is what I can think of off the top of my head. I'll add more if I remember. PS: your avatar scared me In: COH2 Balance
Thread: What's left to fix to have a fairly balanced game? 13 Sep 2016, 21:52 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2016, 18:42 PMThe amazing Chandler No, i dont. Please tell US(F) I dont like the Flame HT, with 90 munis you get the most lethal flame-thrower (double, don't forget) in the game. But that's just me. It's also super fragile and can no longer reinforce In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer mortars doing work13 Sep 2016, 17:23 PM gg wp Maxim spam defeated In: Replays
Thread: PzWerfer vs Calliope.13 Sep 2016, 05:59 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Sep 2016, 03:48 AMeasierwithaturret PzWerfer is alright IMO. It does a fine job at killing models at 0 risk to the user, which makes it a useful late-game purchase AFTER you've already got some armoured units on field. It is susceptible to RNG, in that sometimes it will wipe that pesky ATG completely and sometimes it will only drop 1 model. That is ok though, being able to delete enemy units without any risk is the last thing the game needs more of. Of course it is rarely seen in 1v1 but that is due to the general difficulty that OH has in getting the resources needed to build t4 when they are already under heavy pressure at the t3 stage. In team games it is plenty useful. That applies to most artillery really, in that buffs to make it worthwhile in 1v1 risk making it OP in a team context. I disagree that it's a zero risk unit. It is so fragile if the enemy decides to fire back at it there's a good chances it will die. On top of that it needs to get close to actually do any dmg. Id like the aoe far dmg buffed so it doesn't always need to be on top of its target to kill it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: MG gunner still getting sniped13 Sep 2016, 00:44 AM Why is this still a thing? The number of engagements ive lost against mainline infantry due to the mg gunner getting chain killed is attrocious. Combine this with yellow cover everywhere and mgs stand no chance. Not to mention USF mortar... I feel the AI options of the axis is sorely inadequate atm... In: COH2 Gameplay