Profile of ZeroZeroNi

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1563

General Information


Thread: USF Airborne Commander Revamp29 Mar 2021, 17:14 PM what about a big ass bombing strike ability like UKF "air Supremacy" In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Commander Revamp 202129 Mar 2021, 17:11 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2021, 17:08 PMKiwiBirb Intersting. I dont think that grenadiers should get combined arms, it could lead to grenadier death blobs, similar to the old sturm officer. Also, there is no munitions sink to use your minitions on lategame. Well i coudn't think of any other ability for grens. Maybe more experienced member of the community can come up with something better and thematic. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Commander Revamp 202129 Mar 2021, 17:09 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2021, 17:01 PMKiwiBirb Stop nitpicking this detal. It is irrelivant. If you think they are fine just say "They are fine for their timing and cost", not "(x) has (y) but (z) doesn't, so its unfair" Well, he was explaining to Katiof why factoring the cost of side tech to individual units the way he did it isn't really good. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Commander Revamp 202129 Mar 2021, 16:32 PM I have an Idea for revamping the German Mechanized Doctrine. German Mechanized Doctrine 0cp: 250 ht 2cp: Mechanization Training(new ability): Allows pioneers to do critical repairs similar to USF vehicle crews, and gives grens and upgrade this upgrade gives grens combined arm ability. 5cp: Motorized equipment(new ability): Gives all vehicle 2 upgrade mutually exclusive between spotting scopes and smoke discharge also allows pioneers to build repai bunkers. 7cp: P4 command Tank 8cp: LeFH 18. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Airborne Commander Revamp29 Mar 2021, 12:08 PM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2021, 15:18 PMHannibal But then either price of P47 should go down to 200 or the OST ability to 240 No. Allies have superior anti air. Neither the Flak HT/base, 222, Ostwind or the myriad of pintles mgs can not stop the p47's from doing their first pass. While ju87's will get shot down before they even have the chance to do so. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Airborne Commander Revamp29 Mar 2021, 12:02 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2021, 01:11 AMgeneral_gawain The price should be just exchanged. If tank is standing still on plain ground both will bring down a full health Tiger/IS-2 with their last passing plane. But if the target is moving too fast, is behind cover or driving in hilly territory (wrecked by artillery), P-47 performs worse. So just exchanging cost without touching performance should be fine. For the P47's it depends how you move, if your moving in the direction of the strafe you tanks will die very fast. But you'll always take less damage from ju87's if you move regardless of direction. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF Airborne Commander Revamp29 Mar 2021, 11:56 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Mar 2021, 14:38 PMShadowLinkX37 When the target is stationary they’re both fine. When moving the p47 is still worse. Also 240 vs 200. There is also the fact that ju87's will track you to oblivion if it has to which the p47's won't. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Commander Revamp 202129 Mar 2021, 11:32 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2021, 11:09 AMHannibal You still keep perpetuating this as if it was the only way to do and as if there were no arguments against it. So I'll just keep pointing out that most Allied side techs are meant to delay the main tech, so the costs are also there to delay the main tech. Yeah, in the current build of the game(and for a while) it doesn't really do that. It's only a gating mechanism. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Commander Revamp 202129 Mar 2021, 10:10 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2021, 10:07 AMKatitof In the meantime, I'll grow old waiting for you to come up with a good excuse why. Like I said, i'll let you figure out your self. Or are you saying you are not smart enough to do that in reasonable amount of time. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Commander Revamp 202129 Mar 2021, 10:06 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Mar 2021, 09:56 AMKatitof The usual. Cost of upgrade divided by amount of units that will likely benefit from it. In USF case, 6 would be a good number. I'll let you figure out on your own why that is not a good way of factoring the cost. In: COH2 Balance