Profile of ZeroZeroNi

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1563

General Information


Thread: Late game performances of Volksgrenadiers and veterancy4 Apr 2021, 04:32 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Apr 2021, 02:12 AMNorthWeapon Volks are already super cheap. And the test clearly shows Volks beat Cons at close or mid range. I'm surprised to see Cons beat Volks at long range. Very skeptical about that. Perhaps because of the buff behind green cover. But out of cover Volks definitely win No it's because Cons 12*7>=80 their models that's why. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Late game performances of Volksgrenadiers and veterancy4 Apr 2021, 04:26 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 19:50 PMKatitof That is exclusively at vet3, up until that point they have low dps and bad ra. But they have 6 men. And they have 0.99 ra at vet1. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Artillery observation Panzer for Joint operations4 Apr 2021, 04:02 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 22:46 PMAngrade (Ægion) The Pak 43 damage could be reduced to 240 from 320 and no longer able to shoot through buildings and object, but be cheaper at 300 manpower + fuel and arrives at 6 cp. Yes, maybe add brace and make it undecrew able as well. The excuse for this to not have those was it was soooooooooooooo............ OP apparently. So now in the changes you suggested that it's basically a 17 pdr you wouldn't mind adding brace and needing to be destroyed. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance team should watch Tightropes video4 Apr 2021, 03:46 AM The Balance team should watch TightRope's videos on the British in the beta. You guys fucked up with raid sections there. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Relief Infantry and Rapid conscription3 Apr 2021, 20:59 PM No one is gonna use these abilities. They don't serve any kind of play style. I suggest thinking some infantry based play styles and redesign the abilities around those play styles. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Late game performances of Volksgrenadiers and veterancy3 Apr 2021, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 17:48 PMMr Carmine Its hard to caculate the right amount of cost from an entiere tier to the unlocks of lmg or snare since not every unit in the tier is as strong/valuable as the other. A lot of people believe no tech of any kind should ne added because of this. To my knowlidge cons are the only unit to wich it only effects them, making it easier to do the math. And people need to stop with the cheap cons (wich they arent) beat more expensive voljs/grens and look at the bigger picture instead of those units in a vacuum. Nades also only affect Rifles or Section so that is moot point. Its true allies and okw dont need to tech to build main lines. But allies dont have units as strong as pgrens obers stock to back them up nor mg's as early or powerfull depending on the faction. Ost has the earliest and strong lv fase as well punishing not teching at nades or zooks potentialy. Your Joking right. AEC and Stuart arrives at the same time as ost LV and are significantly stronger. Yeah and you get the MG because of the god awefull shit tier infantry you get. You know despite having an MG do you know why Brits don't function like OST because that is a shit design but allies cant have shit design. Ost fields their medium before soviets get their first t34. So them reaching their final tech with even better units later is more a luxery problem then anything else. Are you high???? If you think that you are much worse then your opponents. F t34's you can get t34-85's/KV-1's by the time OST can hit P4's. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commander Update Beta 2021 - Ostheer Feedback3 Apr 2021, 18:56 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 17:47 PMSmartie Dude, read first, complain later. Assgren unit would of course be a lot stronger if it arrives significantly later. Idea is a longshot anyway. No why should ost be restricted to 1 Ass gren even buffed. Rangers/Paras/Shocks/Mandos are significantly stronger yet there is no restriction on them. Why kind of bullshit suggestion is that. How the F are more OP infantry so balanced in your eyes. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Late game performances of Volksgrenadiers and veterancy3 Apr 2021, 16:49 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 16:38 PMKatitof And its less then regular vet+weapon upgrade. what??? Rangers/Paras/Sections +25 Volks/Rifles/Mandos have +30 Grens/PG/Storms/Ass grens/Obers/Cons/Ass Guards/Shocks have +40 to my knowledge the only 2 units with +56 are Penals and Fallschrimjaeger. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Late game performances of Volksgrenadiers and veterancy3 Apr 2021, 16:43 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Apr 2021, 15:28 PMMr Carmine No it is. Both volks and grens just require 60 muni nothing more to peak. Cons require additional fuel mp and 50 muni to peak and their peak comes later. You know just because OST and OKW don't have a choice of getting their weapons early that doesn't mean it shouldn't counted as investment. It's only 15 fuel in fact most of the allies side tech(what you call investment) is super cheap. The reason why you have to spend fuel to get snares is because non of the allied faction need to build tech to get mainlines. OST/OKW can't get just spend 15 fuel and get LMG's/stgs or rifle nades/incendiary nades but USF and UKF can. Just because allied factions have the choice and ost/okw don't doesn't mean that ost and okw for infantry. And before you say you tech up also with those i'll say allied tech is less expensive. OST can't even reach the final tech level before every other faction can. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Late game performances of Volksgrenadiers and veterancy3 Apr 2021, 16:31 PM I have a proposal, Let's make a special variant of the ppsh called, penal ppsh but instead of working like an smg it works more like assault rifles in the vein as STG44. In: COH2 Balance