they can win against Rangers with some good RNG
Un upgraded Rangers sure, Thompson rangers no way in hell, I'v tested unless they are charging from a long stretch of red cover that doesn't happen.
And "super high RA/armor" squads are actually only two squads (Rangers and Shocks).
Aren't you on the mode team??? Commandos have 0.72 compared to ranger 0.73, Like what????
That's a player related issue then. G43 Storms shouldn't pick a long range fight with these squads. It's exactly my point that their camouflage allows G43 Stormtroopers to negate the long range advantage that these weapons have by waiting in camouflage (and in heavy cover) for these squads to move in closer before opening up. That is what makes G43s on Stormtroopers better than G43s on Panzergrenadiers.
Well if range 15 is considered long I really don't know what to say to you m8. Look, you might think that these are pretty convincing advantages the thing is it's not. The only real advantage g43's on storms have is simple pgrens take time to build and time to come into the field, while storms can be poped from a building in the field way quicker than a g43's pg.
Here is the biggest problem with your argument, You just spent 60 munis on a 340 mp unit. Your probably not going hiding it in ambush and waste you munitions. Ambushing long range doesn't do enough damage. The whole camo + g43's = versatility doesn't rally work out as well. Cus it's always better to use mp40's to ambush than spend 60 muni open up on a cqc squad from max range cus that kind beats the point of camo.
Relic Entertainment
