Profile of Support Sapper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Thoughts on the WINTER PATCH changes30 Jan 2020, 10:28 AM But Anyway, leave alone moving acc, RA buff and smoke pyro is good change. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Thoughts on the WINTER PATCH changes30 Jan 2020, 10:26 AM I will trade section buff for a valentine replacing the bofor in platoon cp as an AI oriented light tank. Open up more LV play outside of AEC. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF30 Jan 2020, 03:57 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Jan 2020, 00:00 AMStug life can i report bug here ? for ukf : the officer has the on me icon when ability is used, visually only the officer has silenced gun other have the non silenced ones the smoke ability of pyro IS is wonky look at it It is intended that officer's bodyguards turn to tommy with nonsilenced sten. I was suggesting give the officer model a thompson(event with sten profile) or a nonsilenced sten. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF30 Jan 2020, 03:50 AM Or, give AT sections sticky gammon bomb with hammer ? Basically satchel charge clone but can work. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF30 Jan 2020, 03:48 AM Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2020, 23:47 PMVipper Read more carefully it was suggested that the AT section grenade should be replaced by AT grenade barrage similar to AT conscripts. In that case AT section (hammer tactics) would be able to fire 5 at grenades and a heavy gammon bomb. I get your point, if AT sections have a AT nade barrage + hammer then it will be guarantee snare + a heavy gammon. Anyway, heavy gammon still not fit an AT infantry unit so i dont see any problem if we remove it from AT sections if AT nade barrage be added. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch for OST?29 Jan 2020, 20:03 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2020, 09:11 AMLewka True and you should usually have pios with them It's not like infantry sections always have royal engineer along side to snare vehicle, so. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF29 Jan 2020, 19:53 PM Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2020, 18:05 PMVipper PLS no more thompson's prolifiration. The weapon is an abomination specifically designed for elite troops. A normal non silenced Sten is enough. . I ask for the thompson mostly for the looking, as an officer model with a thompson both look more realistic and cooler. It can still use sten profile tho. Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2020, 18:05 PMVipper The model could be replaced by an officer model there is one available in files I think of the observation officer. Can you give a picture, i want to see, thank. Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2020, 18:05 PMVipper Not to barrage the combination of heavy gamon bomb and AT barrage is simply broken Heavy gammon can be lock out from AT sections in that case. Heavy gammon bomb is mostly used for anti garrison, not so fit an AT infantry unit. Jump back to quoted post29 Jan 2020, 18:05 PMVipper The vet bonus could be better suited for the unit's role. You mean the critical shoot? Or ? In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF29 Jan 2020, 18:02 PM Still wish for valentine replacing Bofor as an AI oriented infantry support tank to open up more LV play. This may be the last chance. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF29 Jan 2020, 18:00 PM - Officer model should have a thompson instead of currently silenced sten and rename platoon lieutenant for more realistic feeling. Recon run move to vet 0 but lock behind platoon cp, 5th man move to vet 1. - Tank hunter sections should have a AT nade barrage like AT conscrips, at vet or with upgrade to improve scaling. Or critical shoot at vet like siper. In: Lobby
Thread: Patch for OST?28 Jan 2020, 10:51 AM Jump back to quoted post28 Jan 2020, 09:59 AMLoxley No mainline inf should be able to build sandbacks, only pios of each faction. No mainline should be left without snare, tho ? In: COH2 Gameplay