Profile of Support Sapper

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1220 | Subs: 1

General Information


Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF3 Feb 2020, 14:03 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2020, 13:26 PMVipper Infantry Sections Cost Reduce cost to 270-260 Bolster now increases entity size but does not provide the extra entity similar to Ostheer upgrade. Pyro/Medic kit Upgrades redesign to become an option and not a no brainier upgrade. Pyro now increases squad size to 5 (without bolster) add 1-2 scoped Enfiled increasing far DPS lowering close and take up all weapons slots. Could add some ability maybe vs snipers or infatry detection. Medic now increases squad size to 5 (without bolster) tuns one of the entities to medic and take up a weapon slot. My suggestions: Moving acc remain as now. 4 man sections will have 0.8 RA both in and out cover. 5 man sections will have 0.9 RA out of cover and 0.8 in cover. Weapons slot reduce to 1. - pyro sections upgrade add a scope Enfield, unlock arty, smoke, sight and moving acc bonus. - Medic sections upgrade add a model, allow 5 man with bonus RA both in/out cover. - New upgrade: Weapons sections, add 5th man and a transferable bren and maybe some armour like heavy engineer, lock out frag nade. In: Lobby
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF3 Feb 2020, 13:47 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2020, 13:04 PMVipper Deployment Since this now a CP 0 unit I would suggest to make it a build-able from HQ isntead of call in similar to PF. I dont think this is necessary since ass gen, ass engi working the same way and we dont have any problem with them. Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2020, 13:04 PMVipper Grenades To further increase the utility of the unit in early game especially in now QCQ environment and with changes to pyro/smoke access imo the Frag/WP grenade should be replaced by a incindiary grenade similar to VG that has not tech requirement. This will make the unit more useful early on. Again, i dont think it is necessary. As i understand, wp offer both garrison clearing and smoking effect, replace wp by incindiary nade is ok but they still need some think to help with close in like smoke grenade. Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2020, 13:04 PMVipper Building The ability to build sandbag and trenches imo should be removed since this is unit offensively oriented and is inline with OKW doctrinal infatry. One can go so far as to remove all building options. Sandbags can go, but since ass gren can built bunker (i stand for correct about this), i will keep the trench. Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2020, 13:04 PMVipper Vet bonuses One could add a vet 1 timed ability that adds armor to the unit for a munition cost. In addition a vet 2-3 vet bonus could be similar to the RO.E reducing the reinforcement cost to reduce the bleed of the unit in later stages. Agree on vet 2 or 3 reduced reinforce cost but not so much on armour. Still, I cant think of anything other than sprint. Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2020, 13:04 PMVipper Weapons Thompson upgrade should take up all weapon slots. Reasonable enough, equip ass sections with bren is pretty useless. But i want to ask if ass gren and ass engi have any slot. In: Lobby
Thread: COH2 winter balance mod - discussion3 Feb 2020, 11:42 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2020, 06:17 AMZeroZeroNi All they need is a redistribution of their RA. I say make their base RA 0.91(current 0.95) Allow me to remind you that ass sections start with RA = 1. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Winter balance (1/2020) feedback - UKF3 Feb 2020, 11:39 AM Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2020, 11:22 AMVipper Suggestions: Simply change the synergy between Valentine and Sexton. This could be done by adding an aura to Valentine giving bonuses to only to Sexton like: lower reload, CD reduction, extra shell extra, extra range, better mobility... or add an ability to Valentine that buff 1 sexton with similar buffs I'm actuality like this ideal. The most useful bonus with me will be reduce barrage CD for Sexton. I dont know about increase range or number of shell but how about increase vet gaining speed for Sexton ? Or unlock new barrage like air bust shell. Jump back to quoted post3 Feb 2020, 11:22 AMVipper If you proceed with victor approach at least move the ability from Valentine to the new officer so that it can at least be more difficult to move bring the unit calling the barrage in range. I dont think the stock officer is suitable for an doctrinal ability like so. If some artillery be authorized to assault officer then the best thing i can think of is a base artillery barrage without share cd with pyro sections, but anyway, the officer already have enough utilities. My suggestions is, if possible, replace valentine in doctrine by an artillery officer. Then the valentine can be move to stock line up as a new LV. In: Lobby
Thread: COH2 winter balance mod - discussion2 Feb 2020, 13:50 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 12:09 PMKlement Pikhtura I know it is not a thread for this, but why not give assgrens assault rifles in the late game? Instead of 6th man upgrade all 5 guys can get 5 volksgren STGs. Seems logic. Assault rifles for assault grenadiers It is quite awkward to use a cqc squad in the late-game without smoke, to be honest. Then give ass sections 5 thompsons, deal? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:45 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 10:31 AMWiderstreit Will the nerf make game more fun? Sure, I am kind of trolling... but I could vomit when thinking about emplacments. Mate, you are being toxic, please get a hold of yourself. In another hand, i do vomit a lot when i see ost spam 4 mg42 or okw spam 3 leig again ukf. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:43 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 10:40 AMmrgame2 Does this nerf affect hetzer, flameht, flamethrower or incendiary nades? I think no, cause the mod only removed additional damage from flame barrage of mht and leig. Other flame weapons still deal standard damage. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:32 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 10:24 AMZeroZeroNi I'll tell you what happens in a real game now. They brace + repair cus that 10% remaining hp mean regular shot (which when braced does next to nothing) need to kill the thing. And the emplacements gets fully repaired before the cooldown for the next barrage ends. Dude, brace reduce 75% incoming repair, so "fully repaired before the next barrage cooldown" is bullshit. Also, if a single mht can 1 tap a 350 mp investment from the UKF player then it will be abuse. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:17 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 10:06 AMZeroZeroNi They were fixed. The mod team is just going to unfix them. Cus i would understand this nerf if the brits did not got their offense buffed too. But the fact is that's not the case. It's seems like an overbuff + making a niche unit useless. Did you test it ? If didn't, please do it before. flame barrage is not removed, it just no longer do ADDITIONAL damage vs emplacements, so now instead of outright burn any emplacement to dust, they do consistent damage like any other flame weapons. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Why is the ost mortar HT being nerfed vs Brit emplacements2 Feb 2020, 10:01 AM Jump back to quoted post2 Feb 2020, 09:54 AMZeroZeroNi Ahhhh..... Are we playing the same game it has been like 6-7 months since the section nerf. Before that Brits were OP. Do i have to explain to you how the "fix" word mean ? In: COH2 Gameplay