Profile of Bulgakov

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 987

General Information
Steam: 76561198061121041


Thread: OBK lategame is broken beyond all reason.11 Sep 2014, 11:43 AM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2014, 11:02 AMKatitof Actually, OBK is english historically correct short. OKW is proper in polish. What? No. English has taken the original abbreviation. [edit] Ober is one word, why would they put two letters from one word and then omit the W at the end to boot? No. Anyway, even if it were "proper English", in the linguistic context we are all using (CoH2) it's called OKW. So using another acronym would be wrong. OKW is also correct in German, which is the language spoken by the game's faction. I don't se why Polish is at all relevant here Do you have a source that says OBK is correct? Every source I've found says that OKW is correct and that OBK is a Spanish techno group. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ATR shoutcasts Company of Heroes 210 Sep 2014, 21:09 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Sep 2014, 14:11 PMatr3uh [CoH2 - #238] 2v2 in Rails and Metal 2 VS [Spezialeinheit] Det. Nordberg [Spezialeinheit] Det. Lt. Drebin sins_Bulgakov Mr.Osa.PL RLY EPIC FIGHT 2V2 Fubar's cup game 3 by: Mr.Osa map: Rails and Metal 3 - Awesome, thanks for casting us! In: COH2 Shoutcasts
Thread: OKW HT - Relic Hyporicracy 10 Sep 2014, 19:05 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2014, 13:40 PMJohnnyB I like the OKW HT tbh. Especially now that is easier to preserve (gear up means 0 seconds now). Can be successfuly used as a HMG. A more nasty one. That's a good way of seeing it) Wish they'd do the same to US one though :/ Hate watching it speeding round lawnmowing up units on retreat, gobblegobblegobblololtrololol. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: OKW Duplicating units glitch10 Sep 2014, 18:54 PM I say you're probably going to face abusive playstyles so use/abuse what you can. If they ever fix the other design issues, I'll change my tune, but while the game's full of insta-gibbers, do it with good conscience. In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Ninja changes for 9.9 patch10 Sep 2014, 18:37 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2014, 15:20 PMVonIvan Let the maxim hordes begin. Begin? You've been doing them since forever ad nauseum. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ninja changes for 9.9 patch10 Sep 2014, 18:29 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2014, 17:51 PMGreeb There should be a commander with only Maxims and ISUs. New meta: No buildings, no tech, no infantry, just Maxims and ISUs. Maybe with a elite Sniper Ace call-in that could sprint three times faster and shoot kryptonite bullets. That's the design Relic has for soviets. They wouldn't need kryptonite bullets, no supermen in the axis side. The kryptonite would only hurt Shocks Sniper Ace scares me D: In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So...ISU 1-shotting vet stuff?10 Sep 2014, 18:27 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2014, 18:10 PMKatitof Well, technically, that assault gun got artillery piece for armament. No 90-second cooldown, that puts it in the CoH2 assault gun class, regardless of armament. If it had 90-second cooldown instead of 10-second reload, noone would care. And where's dat playercard? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!10 Sep 2014, 17:52 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Sep 2014, 10:01 AMKreatiir I'd like to see upgrades like BAR and LGM's to have more of a downside. Riflemen with BAR's will still rek at close range, while the upgrade is to get more lethal at long range. Make upgrades things to really think about, instead of nobraining equipping all your riflemen with BAR's and Zookes. Want to upgrade your rifleman with BAR's? Well they will now suck at close range. Upgrade with bazooka's? Your units will now become more slow and bad against other infantry. That would make the game interesting because you must think about certain choices. Now upgrades like Bars, zooka's, shrecks on volks and LMG's on grens are pure nobrainers, talking about teamgames. +1! An option which gives you a strength should set you back somewhere else. It would lead to more complex tech choices and counters and counter-counters. Ahhh man I miss vCoH D: In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So...ISU 1-shotting vet stuff?10 Sep 2014, 17:44 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2014, 13:33 PMKatitof And guess what? My axis game count>my allied game count and since I want my ranks to be pretty equal for both sides, I don't see that changing anytime soon All super heavies are broken. None will be ever removed. ISU went a long way from being waste of space, to being OP, to being in current position. Having faced it enough(in current place) I don't think its half as bad as people make it seem. For 2v2 that is. Yeah, I agree they're broken, I didn't call for removal. Y u always imply stuff I don't say ? Just a tweak or some changes. So can we see yr playercard for those game counts and ranking with each faction? Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2014, 17:18 PMASneakyFox isu is an anti infantry tank. its supposed to be really good against them, it isnt so good against a panther, or a tiger, or a elefant... or a jadjpanther.. or a panzer4 are ok if you micro.. or.... A) it's pretty great against tanks too. B) Some people think it shoudn't be THAT good against infantry. Sure, make it good. But not insta-wipe good. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: So...ISU 1-shotting vet stuff?10 Sep 2014, 13:00 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2014, 11:38 AMKatitof A lot of people also begged relic for T34 to stand up to P4 and conscripts to scale and recently a PACK howitzer to be buffed. See how that went. A lot of people also asked you to play the axis factions to gain perspective and that went the same way T-34 may be weak and need a buff but it's not as big an issue as the one raised by the OP of this thread. ISU / Supertanks are breaking the game. Especially ISU. Don't you think it should have been first in line for a nerf? In: COH2 Balance