Profile of Bulgakov

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 987

General Information
Steam: 76561198061121041


Thread: M10-Not worthwhile?30 Oct 2014, 22:05 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Oct 2014, 19:28 PMArclyte this is how you know someone is hopelessly biased As the pot said to the kettle In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Change KT with Panzer 4 battle group26 Oct 2014, 14:15 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2014, 13:13 PMKatitof Kubel wasn't nerfed, just added a minor fuel cost that gets back to you after you scavenge it. Kubel size also increased, now easier to hit with rifles and zookas. Katitof, play axis sometime. I'm sure it would be a cleansing and invigorating and enlightening experience for you. It wouldn't make you a nazi. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Change KT with Panzer 4 battle group26 Oct 2014, 14:13 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Oct 2014, 10:53 AMRandomName Title says it. It would make the Eltie Armor doc more "elite" and people wouldn't also complain anymore about 20 min KT's in 2vs2 and up. I am also tired of seeing a KT nearly every game. USF don't have a hard counter, so this would be also a small balance solution. P4 also would need some love for this. What do you guys think? It would have something with the CoH1 Panther battle group in common. This has been requesten already by more than one person. If you're playing an opponent who is saving up fuel to get KT and you didn't roll over all of them with medium thanks, then that is your fault. I hardly ever get a KT in 2v2 or 3v3, at a competitive level it's very hard to do. Most Allied players have learned to adapt and now rush out a ton of medium tanks that walk through your pueppchens and shreks. Seiously, if you haven't tried it do this new meta: fuel cache fuel cache fuel cache t34 t34 t34 etc Send in infantry spot their AT. Drop incendiary on+behind it. Drive in tanks, kill everything. Be amazed when you realise it's possible to get 3-4 T34s before they get a KT. If you don't believe me, play OKW more. You'll see. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Obersoldaten and stuff26 Oct 2014, 14:01 PM I partly agree with OP on some of the issue But about Obers - on the face of it they may seem OP. They are certainly more powerful than other infantry units in the game. But: A) 2 Riflemen with bars can also stand in front of an MG and wipe it and they come at T0 + 15 fuel + muni for BARs. That's much sooner than Obers B) They come in a faction with mo medium tank (equiv to PIV or T34) that can hurt inf+tanks. You can choose a puma or jagd or panther but there's no anti-inf tank tha can stand up to tanks too. C) there are other vehicles for anti-inf in OKW but with the 66% fuel rate, it's not possible to get both anti-inf and anti-tank. So Obers are a soft filler for that role. With respect (seriously, I mean that), I think if you tried some more games as OKW, you'd see how other players handle Obers and get some ideas. And you'd possibly change your opinion a little about them being OP. I went through the same thing with american units that annoyed me. I played amis and realised they weren't so special and there are counters available. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Issues that plague a German player25 Oct 2014, 21:51 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Oct 2014, 09:20 AMVaz LOL You are truly in another reality. I can't take you serious man, can you provide some replays and references? What your saying here is almost all completely the opposite of what I observe in games. The exception being volks vet0 they die to anything(perfectly fine, they are the cheapest base infantry, less than cons). The other exception is panzerIV J sucks, it does suck. Provide some replays with time references or as far as I'm concerned this is just a trollpost to be lol'd at and then ignored. Seems to me like your playing really badly and ignoring fundamental principles of coh then complaining about being a career punching bag. I know there is some people that I stomp that would say the same things you are saying. Truth is, they just played very badly and it's not about the units they used, any units of any faction under their command would fail. Listen Vaz, you never play Axis, you have no right to comment on axis balance and you certainly have no right to speak to another forum member as if he's an idiot when you have no idea what you're talking about. this is just a trollpost to be lol'd at and then ignored. Learn to communicate better, this is terrible. "omg lol what dafuq you fool, post replays, lol" - this is not the language of someone with something useful to say. Stop posting until you actually open your mind and play axis. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-152 Overnerfed25 Oct 2014, 13:27 PM Jump back to quoted post25 Oct 2014, 00:26 AMvoltardark After watching many beta matches 1vs1 and 2vs2,i can say that the ISU 152 is now border useless for its cost. It was the best weapon soviet faction had... They are now a bear without is best teeth. Sure there are others options, but now the cmrds with ISU-152 are gimped. The ISU 152 was already easy to kill with 2 tanks flanking it, now it's a joke. That was a nice idea, but it's just too much and not fun. The ISU-152 kill infantry the same way the elephant kill tanks. (from afar, fast and is rather easy to kill if you can flank/reach it.) both are balanced unit that do their job for their cost. I would revert the Jagdtiger too, but i would make its shooting through wall a munition ability, and make it 10% slower. The Jagdtiger is in it's own class. (tough to kill and powerful) Thanks. I'm saddened but not surprised that soviet players are now complaining about the ISU nerf. Personally I see the 2 heavy nerfs to be an improvement to the game. I no longer have to choose the Jagd doctrine when I see an ISU commander in the loading screen. I can actually try new stuff and have fun! But soviet-only players want their one-shot boss unit back. Sad. That unit was ruining the game. Yes it was the best weapon the soviets had. It was the best weapon any army had. It was a ridiculous unit. You should be rejoicing that both it and the Jagd have been removed, not complaining that your crutch has gone. Saying the Soviets are now a bear without its teeth is ridiculous. First of all a bears main weapons are its paws and claws. Second of all the soviet army still has a ton of great units and abilities. See this as an opportunity to finally try a new commander instead of spamming guards-ISU all day every day. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let me clear up some things about Relic and AA24 Oct 2014, 20:51 PM I like this thread, it does seem Relic is going to be trying harder now, especially with Cynthia's recent improvements to community support. It definitely has to be borne in mind that they have SEGA overlords who are likely dictating certain policies to them. This limits their freedom to provide the community with what we want. Still, even with the screenshot of Napalm's purchase, I can't bring myself to buy the expansion I've seen too many m3hts with flamers and snipers... Too many ISU-152s, too many Jagds. Too many freezes and too much RnG. Still, I agree with almost everything Napalm said, good post! In: Lobby
Thread: Urban Assault Doctrine24 Oct 2014, 09:39 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Oct 2014, 07:49 AMnee I hope those Urban Grenadiers don't have a silly unit icon: Stormtroopers could have easily used the Stabsgefreiter chevron icon as was used in CoH1, rather than some cartoony pre-alpha Sword stabbing smiley face. lol sword stabbing smiley face, perfect description In: Lobby
Thread: So, lets talk about the ISU-152 and jagtiger changes.23 Oct 2014, 20:32 PM Jump back to quoted post23 Oct 2014, 20:14 PMGinnungagap It's all your fault kreatiiiiiir! Joke. I'm not fond of the change. But then again i'm lazy and don't like playing high APM intensive strategy games e.g. SC2. Whats the problem of the ISU 152? Is is that it one-shots squads effortlessly from far away? Or is the one-shots squads from far away part actually fine and only the effortlessly part is flawed? I would argue the one-shot part is the problem. No increase in reload time, no decrease in range, no limit to unit count and no increase in the micro requirement will prevent one-shots. The AOE has to be tweaked, as far as i am concerned. With the current change it will be necessary to hotkey your supertanks and be able to quickly execute the "attack ground/unit" command even in the heat of the battle to get your moneys worth. The way i see it, players with less stellar micro and reflexes will be severely punished, no matter how good their decision making is. Not sure if i like that. The Jagdtiger can more easily be adjusted, because it is mainly AT. Removing the ability to shoot through buildings or decreasing the range sounds alright. The inherent ability to get stunned could be removed to compensate. Big +1 Just stop the squad-wiping by changing AoE and things will be much better. The changes to JT and ISU are improvements but I think there may be a better solution In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Open Beta first impressions22 Oct 2014, 15:18 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Oct 2014, 07:26 AMKreatiir Before saying the ISU & JT are overnerfed, play some games and think about the fact that they aren't that easy to handle now. Pretty normal, these units have a huge impact on the game so they should be harder to handle. Yeah agree with this, I like the idea of the changes. It's like WITH GREAT POWER COMES GREAT MICRO RESPONSIBILITY. But still no changes to early game vehicles Only Kubel nerf In: COH2 Balance