I wasn't talking about the WASP, I was talking about the Vickers upgrade that can deal significant damage to HMG 42s that aren't in garrisons or heavy cover. Usually enough to force a retreat.
I'm (we are) aware that the WASP is currently a bit underwhelming, especially versus HMG 42s in garrisons, and the WASP upgrade is likely to get an armor increase.
This was true until the recent armour nerf. The MG42's damage output is far too high to use UC against one reliably. If the maverick ost player has gone for the RoF and pen bulletins on their MGs it's a straight up curb stomp.
The APIT rounds delate a UC outright and making the self repair more expensive despite the fact the Brits do not start with a squad of engineers (or even the ability to buy one) has made keeping an early UC alive as well as buying its upgrade for engaging an MG far too expensive.
(Never mind my personal gripe about 'trading with fausts' when button and pander tactician are still lopsided in cost.)
The UC is not an answer to MG42s any more.
And yet the Brits make do in 4v4 scenarios against a better machine gun, and you still think the maxim is not allowed to have the same freedom? Even though it never scales to engage light vehicles ever? And OKW can buy 221s?