So the only way to use AT infantry is to run straight at a tank, then complain in the forums when it backs off and keeps firing at you.
Allied players when they realize that their infantry won’t completely dominate Untill Brummbier |
Oh, it could for example get damage boost from 120 to 160!
Oh wait! It does get it!
According to CoH2.DB the puma doesn’t. But if you tested it with cheat mod I’ll believe you. I don’t have time right now to check sorry
Just please consider that the su-76 has as much range as Jacksons, Fireflys and SU-85s. And vets pretty fast
So a 75fuel vehicle with SU 85 damage/range at vet 3 WITH AI barrage? Hmmmm, |
cant deal with blob = l2p issue, tell that to nicki
EDIT: unless its allied blobs because axis has no counters
The bias is strong in this one |
That’s completely different though. My point is that a su76 that vetted up the whole game should be able to scale a bit better vs late game vehicles to remain relevant.
Can a Puma vetted up the whole game please scale better vs Jacksons/Churchills/T34/85s! |
With the current rework on Pzgren I'm not sure for that, T2 strat around Pzgren and Puma into T4 would probably be too strong.
Your infantry dominate the AI
Your light tank dominate the AT
You still have the HMG.42
You can't simply give Ostheer the best early/mid game infantry and best mid game TD for no extra fuel cost or extra munition cost.
Just for the record, 1st Pzgren hit the field at 4 minutes without the need to cap half of the map. And you can have 2 HMG42 and pioneers before with no delay.
Uhh I think he meant put it in the t2 building, not in bp1 |
I think heavies should be snare-able with only one snare, and have less range than mediums.
Heavies should, imo, be a panther + a P4 with crap mobility’s a trade off.
They should need AT support because they are slow and have little range, and AI support because they are easily snared. |
Currently, getting a medium or saving for something else is a bit like The prisioner’s dilemma.
You are both offfered 2 choices. You can either get a medium, or get a tank destroyer.
If you both choose medium, you are on even ground.
If 1 chooses a medium and one chooses a tank destroyer, the medium player will probably loose
If you both choose a tank destroyer, you are on mostly even ground
1) If you choose medium, you will either be on even ground or likely to loose
2) If you choose tank destroyer, you will either be likely to win or on even ground.
Option 2 is much better because there is no chance you’ll be likely to lose.
And if you lose, he will be able to get another tank just as you get yours, and 2 tanks are very likely to win against 1.
He can even get a medium as his second tank to kill you infantry, and even if you go tank destroyer his tank destroyer + medium should win.
|
There is no "panther" meta. Axis mediums are garbage, there is hardly any point in fielding them as they become redundant as soon as Jacksons/Churchills/T34/85s start to roll out.
The real question what is the point of axis mediums in first place if they get hard-countered minutes after rolling out |
Since when are Sturmpioneers bad? I missed that patch.
They aren’t bad... they’re just confused!
Jokes aside they are fine never improve anything if it’s fine |
"The army has 2 generalist units out of 20+ specialists, therefore its not specialist army"
-OP
The logic is killer on this one.
I... didn’t say it wasn’t a specialist army. I didn’t even say how I felt about balance. I just said it doesn’t fit the theme.
I like the generalist P4. Because otherwise Ostheer couldn’t compete with other nations |