Profile of CombCrab

I am still for split up the guns and the abilities.

-> like I said, there is an unused up-grade icon, a Symbol für STG44(Mp44) with Scope

So we can upgrade PnzGrens with G43 or with better STGs.

Icons_upgrades_icon_upgrade_west_german_smg_mp44 / Icons_weapons_smg_mp44_infrared

Icons_upgrades_icon_upgrade_german_jaeger_infantry_package / Icons_weapons_weapon_gewehr43




e.g. we also have up-grade icons for scoped and non-scoped STG44 and G43.

But then the worldmodel will still be a normal stg, I guess if that's not important, it could be an option.

How should these scoped stgs work? Less dps at short range, more at med and long range?

Doesn't G43s also come with interrogation ability?
The literal conditional map hack?

This ability has little impact, it is too situational. Standard recon, you can use when you are ready to capitalize on the information you gain. You can't rely on this ability to give you info when you need it. Pretty much no one uses it because no one even thinks about it.

It's a cool idea imo, and I don't want it to disappear, but you can't really say that it turns pgrens into scouts on par with JLI or pathfinders. Maybe if it was possible to make g43s consistently leave enemy models in the critically wounded state, you could argue that it's a balanced alternative to 8 extra sight.

(This is my point of view, if the idea is to make g43 pgrens recon infantry)

Have fun!

Is it possible to allow for the deployed 251 to un-deploy and then move somewhere else? That could make this ability very useful and interesting, I think.

If it is possible, I think that it should replace the radio bunker. I think that this makes a bit more sense than a bunker.

its bugged and under the right conditions the scan remain even when not in arc.

Well, if its bugged and can't be fixed, I suppose it would have to be changed to work differently.

G43 profile should be the same as what wehrmacht currently has as a doctrine weapon. NOT THE SAME PROFILE AS JLI,that is OKW.

Pzgrens do come earlier so what does it matter. Should not mean that for that price, should perform any way lesser or lacking in comparison. Sure, timing is a factor but it should not be the case. Everything has to be compared to price and performance. Timing should be independent of those 2 factors.

No wonder many things are unaccounted for because everyone has justified time with their current performance. I am saying that either buff Pzgrens accuracy or RA. Currently both are weaker than Obers accuracy and RA. That is what I am stating.

Should be near but not the same level. Pzgrens should be performing less than Obers but not far lesser than it currently does. That is the point. For its current performance it should be otherwise be 300 manpower. I do not see how it should be 340 manpower at all for the way it currently is.

The doctrinal g43 for grens comes from the "Jager Light Infantry Package" upgrade, I wasn't talking about OKW Jager marksman g43. 4 g43s of this profile would be too powerful, especially if you can give them mg42 later, I do think that a lot of wehrmacht problems come from grens being really vulnerable, but I think that its mostly an early game issue, not late game. It's just a big problem to deal with all the light vehicles and infantry that is a lot better at close and mid range, if you screw up your placement a bit you will have to retreat, your entire force can get collapsed this way, then pushing out of your base is problematic.

Perhaps Pgrens do need a slight buff to RA or reduction in mp cost, but I completely disagree that balancing shouldn't take unit timing into account. The reason obers have to be as good as they are is not only their cost, but the fact that they come so late in the game. You also shouldn't forget that Pgrens don't require upgrades to reach their intended performance level, unlike obers, which aren't very strong without mg34. It is true that a camo upgrade really helps them, but that is a doctrinal, optional upgrade that doesn't increase their performance directly.