Profile of NorthFireZ

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID United States
Posts: 211

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/alongcameaspider
Youtube: https://www.youtube.com/user/andywong545/featured?view_as=subscriber
Residence:

United States
Nationality:

United States
Timezone: America/Los_Angeles

Show Latest Posts


Thread: Stupa (Brummbar poll) 19 Feb 2020, 03:42 AM Jump back to quoted post19 Feb 2020, 03:09 AMSuperHansFan How is this any different from the Churchill? You could make an argument ost repair speeds are weak but they recently got a buff in this area with minesweeper package. If it's going to be a high armor unit it should be balanced around short range engagements. Otherwise you have a situation where it can barrage safely from range but even when allied get desperate and push with mediums or premium meds they will be bouncing (no TDs can not dive high armour units in this situation and this will be a problem) yes, ost repair is pretty weak. Difference with the churchill is that the churhill has higher healthpool and has access to doctrinal crew repair abilities. 5 man Sappers also repair faster than Minesweeper Pios. I didn't make an argument about what the Stupa is. I didn't even say it was weak. Rather I asked what the percieved notion is and how you would improve it since the balance team feels the unit is weak and have now chosen to buff it. I'd like the range to stay where it is, but I also would like the unit to be more reliable due to lack of turret. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stupa (Brummbar poll) 19 Feb 2020, 03:01 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2020, 23:25 PMaerafield if the projectile speed gets increased, then how are you supposed to dodge the shots if it gets fired in the faster cone angle? A brumm always forces a retreat immediately if it hits. I would just revert the range but leave the armor so high that it can bounce AT guns and mediums reliably but so low that it gets evaporated vs tank destroyers, cuz thats how it should be It doesn't evaporate but rather stuck in a loop of infinite repairs against TDS. Well, idk of units are suppose to dodge the shots entirtly but it shouldn't be much of a problem. Leig and Howi has pretty fast shells too. But you can play around with AOE if Projectile speed gets added. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stupa (Brummbar poll) 19 Feb 2020, 02:58 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2020, 23:41 PMVipper Main problem of Axis armor is not their own performance but the performance of the Allied TD... Other than I would test redesigning the unit with the following goals: Increase units tenacity while lowering its lethality. Add utility instead of killing power like: Extra damage vs buildings especially to the barrage Superior modifiers vs cover/garrison similar to flame tanks Critical affects on targets like: vs vehicles injured gunner/loader/driver vs infantry/team weapons new critical "shell shock" penalties to ROF/accuracy/ damage Now the units is designed to spear head attack allot like Churchill and counter buildings and units in cover. I thought Howi weapons like M8, Stupa, and Leig already have bonus damage garrisons? Or maybe that's just their massive aoe. I like the idea of a shell shock but maybe as a timed ability. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stupa (Brummbar poll) 19 Feb 2020, 02:55 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Feb 2020, 23:54 PMT.R. Stormjäger You’re not supposed to get this unit if your opponent has 2+ TDs. Never said that. Strawman. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stupa (Brummbar poll) 18 Feb 2020, 23:15 PM I would just like to see the thoughts on Stupa so far. During the Winter Amateur tournament I've noticed that the armor buff at vet 3 does literally nothing against the already prevelant TDs while make it even harder for mediums and at guns to even think about challenging it. I'm leaning more towards a range revert but the balance team seems to want to make the Stupa a short range, high armored, assault vehicle capable of breaking front lines and decrew weapon teams. However, the range on this thing just puts it at a situation where it's constantly being hit and forced to repair. I'd personally like the Stupa to be more consistent since Heavies can now bleed infantry and chunk them in health in far less shots than the Stupa. Therefore I want some projectile speed buff and vehicle rotation speed to make up for a lack of turret. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer Puma changes18 Feb 2020, 21:19 PM +1 Vote for Stuka Smoke drop as well for more versatility! Ptac is bull but Smoke Drop is versatile and very for assaults as well keeping in with the Mobile theme. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commandos vs 222´s17 Feb 2020, 05:30 AM Jump back to quoted post16 Feb 2020, 20:25 PMdistrofio Even if the players were total morons a 222 and a AMBUSH squad should have a standarized result. a LV displaces ambush squads and AI specialists. Look at T70, AEC and Stuart. They all displace ST and FSJ. Commandos are the ambush squad for UKF and the LV of OST can do the same. Its not l2p if the game balance is broken. https://gfycat.com/warmhearteddeepjackal This truly is a learn to play issue. Can't be that woke to say this is the game's fault. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Commandos vs 222´s16 Feb 2020, 20:22 PM The performance is not the problem this is a L2p problem. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Have mines give munitions when swept16 Feb 2020, 04:18 AM +1 How would you apply this for something like Tellers, Light At mine for USF, or S-mines? Those are pretty unique mines In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: OKW Salvage14 Feb 2020, 20:33 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Feb 2020, 19:43 PMShadowLinkX37 I mean the doctrine isn't that bad tbh. JLI, ostwind, cheap nades, decent arty. It's just nothing so crazy broken that is beats out overwatch or grand offensive. It's not busted and therefore it's not meta In: COH2 Gameplay