if you use the tacmap abuse you can pretty much one shot a pak43 using tank hunters, it's even easier with SU85, that is why you need to put behind shotblockers
Hardly. It's got 80 range and 320 dmg and 3.5 (+2 sec wind down). Provided that you hit it (A HUGE IF), it will still kill you. It's got 470hp (the gun itself). Pak43 is not OP. Not in the literal sense. It's just situational cancer to play against. Truth be told, even when playing with axis I don't usually go for pak43s since I hate being static but having played against ton of them by sim city players, it can be cancerous. 17 pounder can be cancerous if you're trying to destroy it and then it braces and is left with a tiny portion of HP, also can be cancerous, but still less cancerous (for me at least) to play against. And the 17pdr is kinda meme since it needs perfect positioning (easy to pull of on some 3v3+ maps).
I mean, 3-4 months ago I played against 3 OST on angermuende. It was against arranged team so they were well coordinated plugging the holes of friends so a guy placed 3 pak43s around 2 VPs (middle/bot). Those massive f****** were shooting through 2-4 buildings. Every time we managed to dislodge it, the pios that were hiding in the building during the strafing runs would just pop out and recrew it with the reinforce bunker nearby. Calliope did 0 against it since it was hitting the building constantly until it went down and even then it pretty much missed since you need to fire at the gun from a distance (80+) which is quite inaccurate. Only thing that 90% of time did the trick was recon + offmap arty. 80-90% of time it would dislodge AND destroy it (pretty important to destroy it).
All in all, on some maps you will need to spend 150-250 munitions to kill it, and on some you will need to spend 500+ munitions + manpower to kill it. It's not OP, UP. It's just situationally cancerous ONLY because of that phasing.
Anyway, all I wanted to know was whether that was a balance thing or a bug thing and I got the answer. Doesn't make sense but it is what it is.