Profile of Mr.Flush

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 450

General Information


Thread: Soviet Team Games27 Aug 2018, 19:39 PM I actually feel like soviets are the strongest out of all the allies in team games and in 1v1s. They don't have any weaknesses if you are skilled. They are definitely tricky to play and require unconventional tactics when playing at top 30 or below. If you are struggling late game, you should try using the ram ability on the t34/76. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New Commander concepts.25 Aug 2018, 19:08 PM Jump back to quoted post24 Aug 2018, 07:45 AMTiger Baron Just name it USF Meta commander then lol. But in all seriousness, Infantry Company already sort of covers these, Riflemen can build shit, both Rifles and RE can be armed with the M1919A6, you got Priests which are better than the Calliope currently and that's why Infantry is picked more than Tac Support and Tac Support arguably has the best AA because of the M16 out of all of the doctrines. I think a little bit more "realistic" approach would be: Marksman training for Riflemen - Gives the Rifles an upgrade to allow them to "snipe" enemy infantry models, it even has an icon in the game made by Relic, but it takes up either 1 or 2 slots depending on the balance. RE Flamethrowers - Same as Rifle Company, gives the RE a little bit more "utility" as you said, plus USF lacking a flamethrower by default. Riflemen Field Defenses - The works, nothing changed. Priest - because as I already pointed out it's superior to the Calliope, at least for now. Uhm, a generic 105mm Barrage? Idk. And just for the record, the USF sadly don't have a static artillery piece like in CoH with the M2 105 Howitzer, but I think it's for the better since the Priest is a hell of a lot better because of it's mobility and generally the gun was a resource sink after the combat was out of it's range so that's why I never bothered to build it. I was kinda making a joke while giving input for USF. USF needs more units to help them deal with every cheese strategy. Instead of redesigning the whole faction, we can give USF a sniper to counter mgs, echelon a time charged to counter bunkers, and arty to counter blobs and entrenched positions. I would also make a commander with mortars, at 0cps, for both OKW and brits. Some of these units should have been added non-doctrinally in the past. It would certainly make these factions more enjoyable and fun. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New Commander concepts.24 Aug 2018, 00:11 AM I have a USF commander idea. Commander Name: Please stop spamming vs USF commander Abilities: 1. Sniper at 0 cps 2. Rear echelons gain access to the same charge paratroopers use at 0 cps. 3. Priests, static arty, or caliopes unlocked after major is researched. 4 Riflemen sandbags and mine 5.(fill with whatever) I think this will cover most of the holes in the USF faction. Snipers will counter mg and mortar spam on tight maps, rear echelon will have more utility, and USF will have good indirect fire. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: vickers18 Aug 2018, 23:40 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2018, 21:24 PMOutsider_Sidaroth But they nerfed Mortars in general because a pair of them could punish any attempt to use cover. Basically this. Spamming maxims vs Okw was really cheesy a couple of patches ago. Usf cannot take on team weapons strats without mortar half-tracks on narrow maps. If a faction has a weakness, people will abuse the crap out of it. I am not saying we should buff mortars, but we should look at other ways of countering mgs. Soviets, ostheer, and brits have snipers or scout cars to deal with them. Usf and okw have to flank every mg. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: vickers18 Aug 2018, 23:33 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2018, 23:15 PMthedarkarmadillo But they still have smoke The player needs nades to kill models though. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: vickers18 Aug 2018, 16:20 PM A lot of the issues comes from mg being able to be spammed. One mg is easy to take on, but multiple mgs, covering each other, is broken and cheesy. This is especially hard on Usf and okw, who lack hard counters. I would add a munitions cost to mgs in coh3 to keep them from being spammed but still good on their own. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF White phosphorous mortar rounds17 Aug 2018, 15:43 PM Jump back to quoted post17 Aug 2018, 06:46 AMSander93 I don't really understand why everyone is so hostile. I'd say forcing units to retreat is a big enough reward for a 25 munis ability. All other tools that slowed retreats or enabled cheesy wipes on retreat have been removed (stun grenades, grenades on infiltration infantry, etc.) so I don't see a reason this ability still should. Buff the damage or let it kill models, but the movement penalty on retreating units should be removed. The mortar half-track is not at the same lvl as the other cheesy units. It is not going to force you to retreat but will force you to reposition and heal. If you get hit directly, you are able to move out and still retain half your hp, but if you don't reposition, your units will have 1 hp left. The reason Ostheer players get mad is that it counters their mg spam cheese. Having 2 or more Ostheer players build 3 mgs or more and then building mortars is an easy way to cheese USF players because they lack hard counters. Must feel bad to get a taste of their own medicine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF White phosphorous mortar rounds16 Aug 2018, 20:30 PM Grens, volks, and sturms can easily run out of it and heal up. It costs 25 munitions to use white phosphorus, and they do make a sound when fired. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USF White phosphorous mortar rounds16 Aug 2018, 20:12 PM They are not op at all and counter Ostheer cancer. At least you have time to escape, unlike the walking stuka. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: is 2 needs buff6 Aug 2018, 19:19 PM Jump back to quoted post6 Aug 2018, 18:52 PMYRon²y not to hit. to damage. Easier to hit than infantry. In: COH2 Balance