|
But once more: KT is less reasonable in much szenarios than a IS2. make it great again. it should be the lategame nondoc armor and infantery counter which OKW lacks. |
2 P4s have similar cost and far greater firepower.
Panther+P4 does what KT does, but better and if you repair one, other can be in action, so you always have armor presence.
And KT isn't supposed to wipe anything, if you missed the memo for last 2 years, not even nuke "shoot once a minute" weapons aren't supposed to wipe reliably unless you score pinpoint accurate hit.
It could be more reliable vs inf together with IS-2, but neither is supposed to be wiping anything. Brummbar but with AT capabilities is not needed.
wouldnt u agree that the KT shouldnt make a bigger fear to infantery ..than we seen in the video...i mean..it totally miss all the time and need nearly a min to solve the job. this isnt nearly a "infantery - fear" even a p4, HEAT Sherman, t34 could do it better...
|
I'm not getting KT, because I don't like having most of my fuel concentrated into a singular unit(unless its JT). Panther does so much better and one thing I'd consider getting KT for, assisting vs infantry, it doesn't do. Same for IS-2(that moment when KV-2 is better then IS-2). I'm also aggressive in my playstyle, so slow units do not really cut it for me.
Shouldnt the KT a spearhead, which means: attack with them as a frontswine and have an adavantage to get it/ attack with it? But in real coh2 it is a shot on the own knee, u need to repair it more than it is on the front. And also we seen in the video that it cant wipe like it should, have no range to counter armor, is slow as fu** and need babysitting like 1 day old baby on the front |
1) Learn to edit your posts
2) 720mp, 260f. Teching isn't exclusive side tech that unlocks exclusively one unit and is a matter of timing the unit, not the cost. Lack of caches is irrelevant, just scavenge wrecks. Don't complain that faction that is supposed to struggle for fuel struggles for fuel.
And you nearly never see it in tournaments, because there is no point to it there, it isn't how tournament level players work, hell Tiger isn't being used in tournaments and its in strongest state it ever was.
You know why is that? Because in tournaments all resources your banking and saving for later are not on the field, doing the work and contrary to your sub 500-700 rank automatch game, on tournament level you need to put constant pressure and you can't do that with 13+cp end tech units (unless its brummbar durrrr hurrrr), because if you don't, opponent will and will push you off the map, as we can clearly see in literally any 1v1 tournament.
Now, VonIvan got it to vet5 couple of weeks ago and KT clearly carried that 2v2 game.
KT cost 280 fuel...
oh..u mean the 5 fuel which u get from a wreck, when u lucky, that ur oponent dont destroy the wreck/ kill u while u try this on the front?
where is the moment from the video where we all can see how great the KT is? Can we get it? All i seen was the KT need about 10 shoots to kill one sqaud in many szenarios...must be unluck, right? |
But I have a clue about balance in PC games.
And a gun that does 50% more damage then most other while having similar reload wouldn't be balanced if it was allowed fast tracking as well.
And pls do one thing:
tell us the cost to get a KT and compare it with other expansive tanks. Than include the lack of caches for okw. and than we talk again about balance, price and performanche from KT. thats why u nearly never see it in Tourenements... |
But I have a clue about balance in PC games.
And a gun that does 50% more damage then most other while having similar reload wouldn't be balanced if it was allowed fast tracking as well.
look the vid which was posted here and come back with the time u see: yes this tank can be good alone in the follow situation: [Insert your text here] |
But I have a clue about balance in PC games.
And a gun that does 50% more damage then most other while having similar reload wouldn't be balanced if it was allowed fast tracking as well.
Thats why u wrote that:
"You can have heaviest tank with underpowered engine and overweight turret in WW2 or you can have one with decent mobiliy and turret traverse."
Right?
The KT is the most expansive Unit ingame. So it should more than a church with a lil more AT dmg and some armor more. while it cost the double from it. It should have 50 range, really good AI and faster turret traverse when u look on the price to get. |
15-20 range is normal for snares. Not 0
Tested KT
https://www.twitch.tv/videos/344835886
Test #1: All units stationary, range 50
Test #2: Squads moving, KT stationary, range 50
Test #3: KT moving, squads stationary, range 50
Test #4: KT and squads moving, KT avoiding snare
Test #5: KT engine crit speed comparison with moving squad, Jackson attacking.
Sooo...can someone show us where is the moment u think: "my god is this KT OP"
- it need in some parts about 10 shoots to kill ONE squad
- it is horrible slow that infntery can walk with the same speed in front of it..even with no dmg engine
- tds have easy life vs this thing
- it have not the AI and AT performanche (because of low speed and turret traverse) to be good. it is one of the slowest tank, with low range, bad AI and not able to fight armor, because any tank can run away/ shoot from save position/ range
It needs a god dam army for the support....any infntery can walk to it and pfaust it easily |
You can have heaviest tank with underpowered engine and overweight turret in WW2 or you can have one with decent mobiliy and turret traverse.
You can't and won't have both.
Not in one package.
U have no clue how fast this turrent traverse was, my friend. IT was really superfast for this time. |
The idea of it was it'd drive forwards into enemy lines and infantry would run up the smoke to avoid HMGs. Nobody uses it like that, but that's why it's there.
You could give the KT smoke, and it would make it slightly more survivable. But that's not the buff it needs. It needs to be impactful rather than being even more of an unreliable veterancy farm for enemy TDs.
jagdpanzer says 'why won't you love me'
That thing costs and functions the same as an SU-85. If it doesn't have similar penetration already, it probably should.
jp4 has a massive lower pen |
0
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
