Profile of Widerstreit

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1392

General Information
Register Time: 10 Jun 2016, 09:20 AM
Last Visit Time: 3 Mar 2024, 13:02 PM


Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch26 Sep 2018, 22:51 PM @Katitof It is relevant to know the patch-history to give feedback. And after my question if 250 is really needed, I gave a counter idea. I don't know what you are trying to say. Give feedbacks or ideas, don't be a troublemaker. It seems you have troblems with constructive feedback. Even for bugs etc. there is an extra thread, so. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch26 Sep 2018, 22:26 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Sep 2018, 22:24 PMLoopDloop Has there been any word on the new commanders that are supposed to come in this patch too? Are those still going to be a thing? I think they will arrive in a separate patch later. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch26 Sep 2018, 22:10 PM @Katitof Got hard-nerfed last patch... is it really necessary to explain everything for you? Maybe you should start playing the game instead of writing lies. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch26 Sep 2018, 22:04 PM So... after the Sdkfz FlaK nerf also OKW has some suppression troubles. Why not give MG34 to Ostheer instead of MG42 and make the MG for Sdkfz 251 be a upgrade like the flamer. That would solve the MG op-ness of Ostheer in early. Also would buff the Sdkfz 251 to an useful level. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch26 Sep 2018, 21:49 PM In my opinion the artillery officer is still better than the 250 with MG in German-Infantry-Commander. Also the hole 250 is in a confusing spot. I don't see the use of MG for it. Why not let it the normal transporter with passive Vet and maybe a repair ability like UC. If you really want the suppression platform, why not give them the 251 with MG and remove the MG of standard 251. The normal 251 don't really need the MGs. In: Lobby
Thread: Opel Blitz- why?25 Sep 2018, 11:24 AM I am sorry, but Opel-Blitz doesn't lock a position. It only boosts the income. What are you speaking about? In: Lobby
Thread: Universal Carrier vs Volks24 Sep 2018, 09:01 AM Ostheer Pioneers are the worst unit you can equip with a flamer. MP40 of them need close-combar to be effective, flamer needs more range to be not bugged. I would kiss feet to make Ost Pios a combat-engeneer clone. Give it nerfed K98 would be also better than the current situation. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Universal Carrier vs Volks24 Sep 2018, 08:51 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2018, 08:25 AMLago It has a flamethrower because the Royal Engineer squad doesn't. I would be happy if Ostheer Pio lose its flamer, for a buff to sappper level. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch24 Sep 2018, 08:38 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2018, 08:06 AMTiger Baron ... On historical point every fraction should be able to build them. But, fraction design is Germans huge handycap. Especially Ostheer has to be mobile, there is no unit which really benefits from trench. Sandbags are simply better, Osttruppen biggest friend. Ostwall has also concrete emplacements. And if there is a concrete Bunker, also tank traps should be made of concrete. OKW has some benefits for Püppchen, but as optic the trench without netting would look better. UK silk-trenches with mortar bonus would be a great solution to make them more interesting. In: Lobby
Thread: Feedback for Commander Revamppatch24 Sep 2018, 07:55 AM I think it is time to remove the silk-trench for Germans. I don't get the need for it, unless for UK. ### Also, please give Ostheer dragon-tooth tank traps. Not Czech-hedgehog. It fits better with concrete bunker. Commander-ability: -bunker + dragontooth for Pios -sandbags + wire for all units ### UK should get a mortar-squad with range-handycap if not garrisoned. In british silk-trench the squad gets a range boost and reload multibler. Current mortar-emplacement should become a commander unit, pop-cap and price benefit. In: Lobby