Profile of Felinewolfie

Jump back to quoted post17 Jun 2018, 14:06 PMOsinyagov

Strongly disagree! Their outward looks different enough to recognise, which T-34 you face on the battlefield. Here is two main differents:

1. Different turret (most obvious one)
2. T-34 has square fuel tanks on the rear, T-34-85 has round smoke generator devices on the rear.

In that case, Shermans need to get different hulls too, because now:

- Soviet M4A2(76)
- American M4A3
- American M4A3(105)
- American M4A3(76)

have absolutely same hulls. Their differences (except M4A3(105) cause of dipper) only in turret (like for T-34 and T-34-85).

Also M4A3(76), M4A2(76) and M4A3(76)HVSS have very common outward.

Jump back to quoted post9 Jun 2018, 22:16 PMDerKuhlmann

10 min t-85 followed by 12 min katysha in 3v3.

Remove caches Kthx

Jump back to quoted post31 May 2018, 16:56 PMswordfisch

SEGA must be pretty curious how another WW2 title like BFV goes down sales wise. Different genre of course but if the market is there I would imagine some pretty hefty support...

They already banked on the rather niche warhammer audience but seems like they got things the wrong way round, they could have made a lot more money from CoH2 support rather than shipping out DoW3 only to drop all DoW support after release. Then there's the costs of them importing and cancelling contracts of the devs that wanted DoW to be a MOBA, so much wasted dev time. The game was that bad of a mess that they didn't even give it the barebones patches CoH got over the first couple of years.

Total disaster game production and marketing when you already have a succesful title on your hands just asking to be expanded on. (lets be honest here CoH2 could be in the 20-30k's if SEGA paid more attention to it, rather than being second fiddle to DoW and relic being understaffed in recent years).