Profile of Cafo

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 245

General Information


Thread: Are Obersoldaten balanced?27 Apr 2017, 21:56 PM They are barely worth buying, they become very good with vet, like all elite units. I don't think you'll find anybody good that would call them OP In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Call of Duty WW2. 27 Apr 2017, 17:42 PM they showed no gameplay.... ^ and thats not a myth lol In: Other Games
Thread: Vanilla factions´s repair rate26 Apr 2017, 17:38 PM +1 to nerfing the non vanilla factions repair speeds In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Wehr is screwed this patch25 Apr 2017, 18:48 PM vehicles slow to come out.. what about flame HT that thing is op Also you need infantry with support squads.... complaining that a mortar or mg gets overrun is your own fault lol. And also i guarantee your mg micro is off point In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Changing Infiltration Units22 Apr 2017, 12:12 PM i dislike the idea of on field weapon upgrades just seems stupid... just make the units costly and good like they should be... and come on board with the upgrades, just like falls. Spammable callins sounds very aids, they should be a rare and situational, this is why partisans are so aids, they are spammable. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pack Howie Poem22 Apr 2017, 11:08 AM its very good with vet but its hard to get vetted so its pretty bad and feels useless more than half the time and another times it will randomly completely give somebody the dick. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Advanced Emplacement Regiment discussion20 Apr 2017, 15:25 PM I've never thought of this commander as being OP but it is annoying. Brace costing muni isn't a bad suggestion IMO. Let's say somebody buys rocket artillery against an emplacement and they brace...its free and effective defense against a relatively expensive unit, that's not balanced...make it cost muni. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Opinion on the "new" USF mortar?13 Apr 2017, 11:49 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Apr 2017, 00:30 AMZombiFrancis FTFY. The mortar actually was game breaking at worst and imbalanced at best. T0 AT gun is not gamebreaking, but it really undermines the importance of teching making it awkward. Alternately, it could've feasibly stayed exactly the same, but been put into LT tier. It was game breaking because it was performing much better than an ost mortar... imagine if OKW had to go a certain tier for an AT gun like USF does, mechanized for example ... it would be much more awkward for them Placing it in LT tier is even worse because it doesnt give USF a way to counter garrisons/mgs and okw still gets free nades/weapons unlock with tiers. and even with the mortar usf is still lacking with a versatile amount of units and abilities compared to the vanilla factions, lacking basic tools... If it was just a T0 ost equal mortar it would be completely fine and not at all game breaking. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Penals have no counters12 Apr 2017, 17:36 PM AT super nade that you can super walk away from In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Opinion on the "new" USF mortar?12 Apr 2017, 12:01 PM Im not sure why you wouldnt just make usf mortar a copy of ost one....i would trade this mortar for free flame nade unlocks (with tier) anyday.. like okw gets... it also gets the additional benefit of denying cover. its not like a t0 mortar is game breaking.. T0 AT gun isnt gamebreaking.. USF needs to go cpt for one...or go a useless doctrine.. Or maybe you could just move its range bonus vet to 2 or something. It could use some love.. the range is a joke also... a mortar without range just seems so stupid to me lmao.. even if the accuracy completely goes to shit it should still achieve greater range. In: COH2 Balance