Profile of Jespe

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 190

General Information


Thread: USF didn't need a mortar.11 Jul 2016, 06:22 AM Apparently because USF now have mortar we could remove these Smokenades and firing pit riflegrenade countering MGs and such, as they now have mortar so why would they need them? Appart from fixing the bugs/features there are couple of thing from axis point of view what should be enhanced now. - (p/as)Gren healing, it should heal the whole squad and come from 0-vet... Only way on start to keep them fighting in the field against USF. - Give OKW some anti MG weapons too (tier-0), even a smokenade as it is not a counter against MGs cause USF needet mortar to counter them, its rly stupid to run around a building with Spios to kill Vickers/maxim inside that only when those LEROY rushes succeed. [RANT] From the games played as USF i never had problems against MG. When they started to bog me down well hello there mr. packhowi, how would you like this napalm shot to your face which bugs so much you cant even see it before it has killed your squad. Now with using the mortar its even more easier forcing OST to use doctrines that spam infantry as they need to be more mobile than static. Maybe in the next balance patch we could have '30 cal. In tier-0 because all those asgrens, ostruppens and stortroopers need suppression to not kill our precious mortars. Edit: And to make it line with last usf balance patch it should have setup time and crew of the maxim, Field of fire and suppression from MG42, Damage and range from the Vickers and possibility to suppress farther than the range is like '50cal. [/RANT] In: COH2 Balance
Thread: 17lbr to 14 Population10 Jul 2016, 22:13 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Jul 2016, 02:41 AMmiragefla It's pretty much the only emplacement that's not ridiculous simply because it can't nuke infantry or counter its counter aka Bofors Barrage. You can walk up nearly anything to it and kill it with its best counter probably being other ATGs. Furthermore, it can actually be flanked, unlike the 360 Bofors murder machine. It deserves less population and maybe a slight fuel decrease. Yeah, but it should cost that the bofors cannot anymore penetrate main battle tanks or it should cost munitions to activate its damage to tanks. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Make Ostheer lategame great again!9 Jul 2016, 12:34 PM Jump back to quoted post9 Jul 2016, 12:16 PMAradan What Ost only need is T0 MG exclusivity. Lets remove Brits MG from T0. That would ease OKW a lot... --> Isnt the IS nerfed so that it could not anymore challenge MG42 from green cover? It would need a slight buff then... How about first unit could have a 2' mortar. --> They did have something similar i Vcoh if i remember correctly.. It would stop people crying for a mobile mortar too. --> something similar like the one shot from Firing pit. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Heavy engineers Vickers 8 Jul 2016, 16:07 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2016, 13:22 PMMr.Smith The bonus only affects their Sten guns, which have a very small effective range. Thus, you will almost never have the benefit of cover and the ability to damage your opponent with Sten guns at the same time So it works only in green cover? I always tought that brits have unfair advantage late game where there is yellow cover all around the battle zone if form of craters... In: Strategy Desk
Thread: My feelings about the game in its current state 8 Jul 2016, 12:16 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 10:03 AMTiger Baron I am sorry but I still don't see the point in paying 30 fuel for a unmanned damaged vehicle finisher, and yeah I enjoyed taking down tanks like that in CoH. Difference there was I'd get 2 half tracks with a Panzer buster squad in each and flank the poor enemy tank form the 2 sides, even better when the tank had no support. You aren't paying that fuel for the unit only. There comes this pgren with it that has unique ability to upgrade inside the HT and on enemy territory (or it did last when i used it). (honestly it should come with shrek already for that price) Have to try those again this weekend. Why on earth i did'nt even remember that unit is in MAD... Just wondering that usually MADder jump tier 1 but if someone jumps tier 2 and uses that HT and PGrens as primary AT until Stug... this would apparently be insane and would fit my style of play... It would not be as bad as playing brits agaist super agro OKW... In: Lobby
Thread: Vet 38 Jul 2016, 07:59 AM ?!? Am i the only one to plant a mine in my own retreat roads so that if they are following me with light tank or something similar and trying to get the squad wipe they drive on it. But sometimes it feels like that pursuer just "misses" hitting the mine and wiping the squad how lucky can that be. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Heavy engineers Vickers 8 Jul 2016, 07:55 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2016, 17:29 PMCieZ If you want them to be a long range combat squad give them the Vickers K + Double Bren LMG. This firepower combined with their 50% reinforce cost reduction at Vet 3 makes them extremely efficient, although not as outright powerful as a Vet 3 infantry section. I've had used them couple of times so that i have 2 RE with 2xbrens and vickersk. They seem to melt everything living thing in front of them. Seeing obers start to run away from them than fighting makes me giggle BUT one arty shell and its all over in bad spot. a rly expensive unit to lose. Fun fact is that hey can have 3 lmgs and mine sweeper so mines won't hurt them. ( damn asymetric balance Spios i am looking at you) In: Strategy Desk
Thread: Maxim HMG - Unreasonably overnerfed8 Jul 2016, 07:26 AM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2016, 03:32 AMMissCommissar Yea, but problem is - 6 men squad is not such powerful boost, for to compensate very limited arc of fire and small areal supression. And fast setup is a myth - it takes sometimes even bigger time for setup that MG, because of strange working animations. 1. 6-men squad means that they survice always now when retreating as targeting won't target the carrier anymore 2. Grens, and pgrens spotting for them self the moment they see maxim and start to move towards it means that if SOV player spots them in a same moment maxim has a chance to turn around and shoot that flanking unit 3. Its hard to micro MGs but at least Maxim suppresses targets in time opposite to mg34 where you can some times just walk trought its arc. Bonus: I think we should nerf the maxim because historically ruskies used cloth ammobelts opposite to metallic in their machine guns making them jam easier on the move so how about 50/50 chance it should start reload animation after redeployedment (AAAaand waiting for the hate 1-2-3-4-5-....) In: COH2 Balance
Thread: My feelings about the game in its current state 8 Jul 2016, 06:06 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2016, 22:37 PMMistah_S You have no fkn idea mate. Playing as OST is like being a German at a comedy festival... You're not going to have much fun. Yeah, i have no idea... Stopped playing ost after people realised that mortar is hard counter for OSTs soft counter for rifleman. And its bugging makes it useless effort to relocate mg42. Playing MAD, g43 rifles and OSTtruppen just to have a chance to outplay the mortar away is not fun after couple of games. Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2016, 22:37 PMMistah_S No, he is talking about body armour. Are you certain about this? and no they don't need armor, if they had more armor you could just trash rangers and shocktroops with them. Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2016, 22:46 PMTiger Baron ...useless with the 250, that thing is just beyond fucking useless... Have you ever tried to hunt down a damaged tank with with shrek Pgs in it? Its flimsy put it can give quite punch with shrek Pgren and people don't usually anticipate it. ...And maybe it should have some kind of small mg like UC... In: Lobby
Thread: My feelings about the game in its current state 7 Jul 2016, 14:28 PM Jump back to quoted post7 Jul 2016, 13:27 PMTiger Baron Dude what are you talking about doctrines have nothing to do with this, and how is a single Wehrmacht going to cover the whole playing field with MGs exactly? And I'm not playing with my hands behind my back Relic to tied them there and are limiting the OKW start. And again, what 3 minutes are you talking about, the British first unit out of the HQ could you be an MG, the 2nd Soviet one can be a Maxim. I know that there are true problems in axis play but you don't even want to understand. Ignorance is a bless. In: Lobby