Profile of Antemurale

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 951

General Information
Steam: 76561198088648045
Timezone: Asia/Taipei
Game Name: Antemurale


Thread: Fall balance preview20 Jul 2017, 02:03 AM Plus, because Calliopie and Land Mattress are garbage, they are pretty hard to counter as allies. We had how many leIGs that game? 8? In: Replays
Thread: Fall Balance Preview19 Jul 2017, 13:25 PM Thought I would post on something nobody else has: anti-aircraft. From my testing experience, heavy AA weapons (Ostwind, Bofors, Schwerer) are reliable against aircraft. On the other hand, light AA weapons (222, Flak HT, Flak Emplacement, pintle MGs, M15A1, M17 Quad, Centaur) are pretty inadequate. Seems to me that there is an imbalance; the Allied factions have access to less powerful AA assets, and only the Brits get an "effective" AA weapon. To adjust this, I suggest that the armor on aircraft is reduced to give MG-based AA a better chance of damaging aircraft. In: Lobby
Thread: Fall Balance Preview18 Jul 2017, 02:24 AM Link to official forums: https://community.companyofheroes.com/discussion/244194/fall-balance-preview-changelog Link to download mod: http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=1079044359 In: Lobby
Thread: [2v2] Crossing in the Woods20 Jun 2017, 04:31 AM WM+WM verses SU+UKF Best 2v2 I've played in a while. Got carried pretty hard in this one. Enjoy! In: Replays
Thread: hellooo19 Jun 2017, 13:32 PM Don't forget, if you fun into problems, feel free to check out the State Office! In: New Members
Thread: what is your favourite casted games?15 Jun 2017, 07:51 AM https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=To7xWrEaJEo&t This game has been my favorite casted game for quite some time. Prepare for a clown fiesta on Semoisky. In: Lobby
Thread: Hello2 Jun 2017, 05:37 AM Hey there! Welcome to the forums! Don't worry, not everyone here bites, and generally in the State Office, threads are less salty . If you'd like to play some games with me, feel free to add me on Steam! In: New Members
Thread: Victorious Day Art Assets30 May 2017, 07:48 AM Amazing work Kasarov, keep it up! In: Modding and Tools
Thread: Eastern Front Armies Revamp 23 May 2017, 09:01 AM Feedback after some testing with friends at a similar level: -Conscripts. Much more consistent, although I still feel that they are overengineered. -Demos. They don't kill as much (inflict MP bleed) as I would like, but they work well. Also, is it possible to make the targets stunned and pinned? This way, they can neither fight (original concern was that pinned team weapons continued to fight) nor cap territory (which they can do when stunned). -G43 PGrens. They feel much stronger now, but not overwhelming. They are great at ranged skirmishes, yes, but they still lose to dedicated long-range infantry (USF and Brits aside, dual DP-28 Guards). Perhaps increase the upgrade's cost to 60~75MU? -Guards. They are pretty useless without weapon upgrades, and I find myself leaning towards giving them dual DP-28s for the anti-infantry power and Button ability (then killing it with an ATG). Buying two PTRSs aren't enough to keep light vehicles away (e.g. WM Sdkfz. 251/16 Flammpanzerwagen), and one DP-28 plus one PTRS doesn't allow you to kill light vehicles quickly enough, nor have enough anti-infantry power. I would suggest reverting the weapon loadout to its previous state (4x Mosin 2x PTRS, 2x DP-28 upgrade). Alternatively you could give Guards a "Treadbreaker" ability if they upgrade with a PTRS, however if this was the change. The Vet 1 Hit the Dirt! ability is pretty decent, however they become a Grenade magnet because they can't stop a Grenadier squad from firing a rifle grenade nor kill a charging Panzergrenadier squad quickly enough. Most of the time you're forced to retreat. Unfortunately, I have no idea how to improve it. -All of the changes to advanced mediums (T-34/85, Panther) and heavy tanks/ tank destroyers (Tiger, Elefant, IS-2, ISU-152) are great. -WM T4 being locked behind T3 is undesirable. I would like to see strategies that involve skipping T3, because it increases strategic diversity. Will continue to test this mod. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Eastern Front Armies Revamp 22 May 2017, 08:37 AM First of all, great work! I enjoy seeing balance patches like this, and I agree with the majority of the changes. A side note, I'd rather see multiple patches working on specific areas. For example, Infantry Balance 1st and 2nd patch, Vehicle Balance 3rd and 4th patch, Commander Balance 5th and 6th patch, wrap-up 7th patch, all distributed over the course of 7 weeks. What I'm saying is, I'd like to see smaller, incremental changes to the game rather than one massive patch that moves the game to CoH 2.5. On another note, here is a long list of issues I have with this revamp: SU - Conscripts. Completely over-engineered in my opinion. Simply giving them a weapon upgrade when T4 is built, and toning down their received accuracy at Vet 3 (more damage, less survivability) would help them reach the same effect: better scaling into late game. - M3A1 Scout Car. I agree with the mobility and survivability buffs that help it scale into late game, but the health and armor increase will make it terrifying to deal with as OKW. - Guards. Also an over-engineered revamp. Keep the 360MP cost and the new grenade, revert everything else (PTRS damage, veterancy scaling) state. - Partisans. Infiltration units were cheesy because of their grenades that could instantly wipe a team weapon/squad or snare a light vehicle. Just the popcap/reinforcement cost adjustments and the grenade cooldown on spawn is enough. - Mark Target. I welcome counterplay, but both nerfs combined make it too weak. Keep one or the other; personally I'd just give it a 5-second delay until activation (because of the abundant AA capabilities OKW gets). - B4. Howitzers are mainly used to destroy static positions (OKW HQs, PaKs and leFHs) so counter-play by allowing your enemies to move is odd from my point of view. - Forward Headquarters. Now this is far too underwhelming. It was fine before because it had clear counter-play (indirect fire to bring the HQ down), I don't quite understand the need to alter it. WM -Panzergrenadier Mark Target. Medkits were fine and allowed a player to play aggressively: reinforce via halftracks and heal without needing to run back to base. The new Vet 1 ability only works as an anti-vehicle tool, but often times Panzergrenadiers are used for their anti-infantry power. An unnecessary change from my point of view. - WM Tier 4. I disagree with the change to WM teching, because it forces players into a fixed tech route. To make T4 accessible after building T3, AND keeping the option of skipping T3 for T4 open, make it so WM Tier 4 requires EITHER T3 Built or BP3 researched. (Also make it so BP3 is automatically researched when T4 is built). - Tiger Ace. This unit was cheesy because it had no fuel requirement and no tech penalty. Now that it has both, I don't see a need to keep the resource penalty; it's now a one-off, very powerful (and very expensive) unit. Perhaps increase the fuel cost to 260 as well. - Spotting Scopes. Could you elaborate on how it might create issues for revamped-WM late game? I'm interested in how a 3.5 second activation delay is necessary. - Panzer Tactician. This ability already requires a munitions cost, and can be easily counter-played through the use of attack ground. I don't see the need to add a 2.5 second activation delay. In: COH2 Gameplay