Profile of mortiferum

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 571

General Information


Thread: Emplacements Rage4 May 2016, 07:50 AM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2016, 07:45 AMeasierwithaturret If there's a way to win that works then people will take advantage of it. Yes it's unsatisfying to play against but abusing the guy using it won't achieve much. If anything the kind of player who uses emplacement cancer probably will probably just enjoy it even more. Which is why you only abuse them if you kick their head in, camp them out, burn their HQ to the ground using Ostheer flametrack. If not, be nice so you don't feed their ego (Do not take seriously, I am only joking around :/ ) In: Lobby
Thread: Should 17 pounder have less popcap?4 May 2016, 07:49 AM Jump back to quoted post4 May 2016, 06:59 AMDjDrowsyBear The problems you are seeing have more to do with how awful the other emplacements are to deal with, not the 17-pounder. The 17-pounder looks good on paper, but that is it. The real solution to all of this is to balance all of the emplacements. Bofors and mortar pit need sizable cost increases and the 17-pounder needs a cost decrease. Suppose you are right, but the only argument I will raise is this. As of this patch, emplacement as a whole are already extremely difficult to deal with, leaving medium-heavy armor as the only solution against British using advanced emplacement regiment. Having the 17pdr buffed without the other emplacement toned down in terms of effectiveness or durability will make the "fort" too capable against all targets. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ideas on improving OKW Flak Emplacement4 May 2016, 06:49 AM Two real problem really. - Being decrewed too easily - 9 out of 10 rounds in the burst will hit the ground in front of the gun instead of ANYWHERE near the target In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Should 17 pounder have less popcap?4 May 2016, 06:36 AM Keep at 20 or reduction to 18 at most. It cannot be de-crewed It can brace Fire flare Exists along side other emplacement Cancer regiment makes it even tougher It is twice as good as the pak88 in almost all circumstances due to how well it synergizes with other emplacements and doctrine. It also maintains veternacy much better... Since the crew is immortal. That is a major selling point of higher pop cap as well. Any reduction will lead to more sim city, more cancer. Yes, I am, and will only view the balance of emplacement under the assumption cancer doc is used. Anything less is pointless. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ideas on improving OKW Flak Emplacement4 May 2016, 06:28 AM My suggestion is remove it. Replace with the 37mm flak found on Panzer HQ, in an emplacement similar to Bofor. No brace, no barrage, but cheaper and suppresses while dealing less damage. Area denial/ support rather than unit removal. ----------- More reasonable suggestion Remove decrew Keep damage as is Increase accuracy, suppression, remove stupid hit ground in front of emplacement bug. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Emplacements Rage4 May 2016, 06:20 AM I keep it to myself till I blow them up and base camp him. Then I just say: "Malignant growth removed, try again" and "Where is your cancer now, prick?" If I cannot win, I make it as unenjoyable as possible by dragging the game out as long as I physically could. In: Lobby
Thread: (may preview) okw medic truck and anti-tank3 May 2016, 12:22 PM Jump back to quoted post3 May 2016, 12:10 PMKatitof Image Almost sounds like Relic best (TM) balance policy! :/ Raketen needs a firing arc increase or setup time decrease in exchange for that reduced range IMO so it isn't as vulnerable to flanks from light vehicles... since anything can wipe it pretty much. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Bofors3 May 2016, 09:15 AM I am interested in how to counter a team play where one is terminal cancer and the other has land mattress which only does counter battery. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Remove territory point blocking from vehicles2 May 2016, 09:56 AM Yes, I do not want to see my Panzer IV (or any tank for that matter) deciding that a flagpole is too sacred to drive over before being rekted by AT guns that it could have ran from if it not gotten stuck on a bloody point. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: (may preview) okw faust 2 May 2016, 09:53 AM There really isn't a free reign of clown car. Sturmpio actually "kills" the clown car quickly.... There is significantly less resistance against Stuarts if you went medi HQ though, thanks to useless Raketen/ Light tank rush meta. In: COH2 Balance