Profile of |GB| The Hooligan486

Jump back to quoted post16 May 2016, 09:20 AMCartoonVillain

So I've been studying the ideal commander loadout for 1v1 and a few doctrines keep coming up, mobile defense and mech assault being two of them. I current roll with mobile defense, spearhead and elite troops, but I keep thinking about replacing elite troops with mech assault.

I love mobile defense for the panic puma, but I've been reading that people sometimes use the Stug E instead, and I don't get why?

It's decent vs light vehicles and in theory vs infantry, but it doesn't really seem to hit anything (infantry I mean). Obviously it's useless vs any kind of medium tank. Also, it's got no turret and turns like a whale. Finally, the Puma has access to panzer tactician implicitly, while the Stug E does not. I've used the Stug E a couple of times, but I really fail to see what it's good for. If anyone has a 1v1 replay where Stug E's (and the entire doctrine) got used effectively, I'd really appreciate it.

Jump back to quoted post15 May 2016, 18:22 PMMajorBloodnok

I would prefer Rzhev over Liennes Forest, Lanzerath Ambush or City 17 - the moving bases are intolerable, IMO. I agree Lazur Factory should be kept in.

Jump back to quoted post13 May 2016, 21:55 PMwouren

Hey mate, just get your squad out of the way. If it's as effective as a normal grenade then good because it's the same cost as one. Don't worry. Nothing's wrong.

Show Spoiler

Jump back to quoted post14 May 2016, 15:02 PMBlackKorp

for a long while i think about doing a thread that lines up all imbalance in 2v2 map design, but i don't to it because it would take some hours of writing.

Every map in this game is imbalanced, crossing, rails, minsk... even small differences between your and opponets side lead to an unfair game.

As long as maps in coh2 not perfectly mirrored it will be this way.