Profile of MrBananaGrabber.

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 328

General Information


Thread: War spoils leaks4 Mar 2016, 04:08 AM The people with Ardennes Assault bulletins should certainly get something. For a lot of time several of those bulletins were useless and/or broken. If they do actually bother to compensate people for all the bulletins they currently own - after hundreds of hours of gameplay. Then there will be plenty of Scrooge McDuck's vault levels of coins. In: Lobby
Thread: Guard Infantry3 Mar 2016, 13:55 PM Brad said not being able to buy back PTRS rifles is a bug. So I'm sure that will get fixed between now and COH3. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [LIMITED!] LEAKED COH2 ALPHA PICS3 Mar 2016, 00:08 AM The game also ran a lot better and required less hardware to do so. In: Scrap Yard
Thread: War spoils leaks2 Mar 2016, 23:57 PM How much confidence do they have in their redesign if they don't want to tell the community as a whole what it is? As said previously here, and ever since war spoils was released: the existing system could be hugely improved with a handful of very basic tweaks. Why not start there, rather than with a whole new system, which may be as unpopular. If they made their ideas on the new system open to constructive feedback and experience from THE ENTIRE COMMUNITY there is more chance of them releasing something decent. And not another system type that no one asked for and may potentially dislike - which could lead to yet another redesign. As for this thread getting nuked... In: Lobby
Thread: War spoils leaks1 Mar 2016, 19:53 PM I'm just glad that after all the negative feedback the original War Spoils systems received, they've decided to include the whole community when designing and making the replacement system. And haven't just relied again on a small group of people to decide on what system the game will use...ooh, right. In: Lobby
Thread: Please add more vetos when adding more maps29 Feb 2016, 23:48 PM I hope Relic see this, I know they pride themselves on doing what the community ask for. This would be very quick and easy to implement. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Please add more vetos when adding more maps29 Feb 2016, 11:47 AM Jump back to quoted post27 Feb 2016, 08:42 AMSpinflight Talking of which vetoes don't seem to be working for me now. Imagine how great it would be if they added more vetoes when they fix the veto bug... In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: COH2: The Soundbug Returns27 Feb 2016, 01:58 AM Are you sure it isn't just the mic of one of the players, when they see a 20+ RE squad approaching? In: COH2 Bugs
Thread: Please add more vetos when adding more maps27 Feb 2016, 01:18 AM It would help lower the number of people who drop at the loading screen, due to not liking the map (which screws everyone else instantly). And it makes sense to keep the ratio of vetos to the number of maps, as per how they were before new maps were introduced. This is a relatively minor thing but it would be hugely appreciated, and I'm sure it would help lower the number of loading screen/start drops. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Poll: Relic26 Feb 2016, 19:16 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Feb 2016, 19:05 PMiceman If people don't like Relic's version of the 'balance' how is it the CoH2 communities fault? I thought Relic was in business to make the business expert decisions to make a good product. Also, its obvious to the community that Relic's version of 'balance' in reality is not adequate. I couldn't agree more. I'm sure things will slowly get better, as they have been over the last few years. But it's a very slow process, often with one step forwards and two step backwards. Perhaps just like coh1 it will be five years or more before the state of balance is at a good place. In: Lobby