Profile of Zyllen

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 770

General Information


Thread: Concerned about 222 price20 Feb 2016, 13:46 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Feb 2016, 13:13 PMFiresparks considering both the greyhound and the 222 have tinfoil armor, the faster 20mm would win pretty easily. oh men. the greyhound has nearly 3 times more armour then the 222 and is their fore nearly bulletproof. and the 222 unlike the greyhound is their to kill lv's. the 222 do need a higher price to go with the buff. with the hp change it's going to be stronger than the m20. The m20 is still far more versatile with smoke, mines ,free zook and crit repair. and the 222 is meant to be stronger as its purpose is a dedicated LV hunter. which at this point never really made an impact on the allied lv's ever. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase AEC's price from 50 to 70 fuel15 Feb 2016, 14:01 PM Jump back to quoted post15 Feb 2016, 11:42 AMashxu Go Sniper then? A good tactic is to screen your sniper with Grens and faust the AEC if they give chase. If you nab a hit then get your AT gun in position or get your pgrens up and you will kill the AEC in one salvo on top of the faust. How is AEC rush any different from rushing a Stuart or M10 besides it comes out faster? for the UKF it's almost guarenteed that they'll get one too unlike USF where they could get either. Also IS suck compared to Rifles This. You haven't seen an early game crush until you've tried UKF vs Ostruppen. WTF? you dont have the mp or time to have a sniper PG's/pak and several grens. wtf is wrong with you? And the problem of the aec is that 1.it has superior AT and AI to the stuart (to the point its a threat to all medium armour) 2.much cheaper then the stuart 3.comes out faster then the stuart 4.comes on a defensive faction and doesnt need something like the AEC. all in all the aec needs its aoe removed and the infantry sections buffed. Anybody disagreeing is a real idiot in my opinion. That the brits needed to be buffed early game was certain. buffing the AEC was one the stupidest thing relic did since dow 2 1.3 patch. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Increase AEC's price from 50 to 70 fuel13 Feb 2016, 21:37 PM The current AEC is better at AT and AI then the stuart. it should be 90 fuel all things considering. but to be honest the brits didnt need an attack vehicle as it flies against the whole defensive faction thing. revert the change and buff the is. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson11 Feb 2016, 15:48 PM Jump back to quoted post10 Feb 2016, 21:39 PMImagelessbean This is a good example of the inconsistency of USF TD's to deal with heavy armor, in spite of being the only non-doc solution, even when HVAP is used. JT in team games is almost effectively a single hit since almost any damage will render the Jackson a smoking pile of twisted metal. We call this " Shit happens " . Better sacrifice another goat to the rng gods. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson10 Feb 2016, 01:24 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2016, 14:58 PMkitekaze HVAP is vet ability. How the vehicle can vet up is another story. If there is no penetration, then there is no HVAP. Bringing HVAP to argue is the same with bring Blitzkrieg or Tactician Smoke to argue. From my previous experience, M36 fare better chance against medium, because shot always penetrate. Against heavy armor like Panther, Tiger and higher, M36 become RNG dependency. If player is unlucky, the heavy will laugh and start to slaughter, maybe not the M36, but the infantry or vehicle it suppose to cover. Once the heavy finish its role, it retreats back and M36 cannot venture to chase because of its measly hp. Now you are just whining. this TD penetrates heavy armour 2/3 of the time. much higher rate then the stug or jp4 against the allied heavies like the comet pershing and is2. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: M36 Jackson9 Feb 2016, 10:14 AM Jump back to quoted post9 Feb 2016, 08:41 AMkitekaze The zook blob may work, but quickly becomes invalid by weefee from another wehr player. Back to the topic, M36 gun should be more reliable at penetrating panther and tiger at long range (you can't use them at close range at all). Are you kidding me? the jackson is the the third best TD that can penetrate a heavy tank. the only ones that do it better are the panther and the firefly but they have shit dps. with hvap they are the best TD's to take on heavy tanks. the weakness of the m36 is not heavy tanks but medium tanks. 2 p4's will have a far better chance to catch a m36 and because of their much higher dps can quickly eliminate a lone m36. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fixing Volks - MP40s for shrecks2 Feb 2016, 19:39 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Feb 2016, 21:48 PMelchino7 It's simple. While we can discuss performance of Shcreck vs Zook and Rifle vs Volks all day, the reality shows that we don't see Rifle Zook blobs running around as much Volks blobs with shcrecks. The later is mostly as that it's only and main role. That still doesn't make it an balance issue. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Fixing Volks - MP40s for shrecks1 Feb 2016, 19:54 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Feb 2016, 18:00 PMelchino7 -They are both more expensive to build and to reinforce -You are losing more AI by having 2 zooks than only 1 shreck -Lower damage and lower penetration against higher armored tanks -Burst damage. While zooks have higher RoF, what it matters is only the first or second salvo. People don't care about zook rifles as it's way more scary double bar/1919 rifles. To address point 1 -4 you are incorrect. you need far less rifles squads achieve the same effects of the a vg with shreks. 2 rifles with zooks will kill a medium tank in the second volley. you will need 3 vg's for the same effect. they win in burst because a riflesquad will do 160 compared to the volks 120 damage . Because you need less squad you are using far less mp. Your correct on lower AI but i do not judge dedicated AT units on the performance of their AI. You are also incorrect about the heavies. the zooks do their damage against them through deflection damage. zooks are more less equal in shreks in that department. But BOTH weapons suck against heavies anyway In short you have rifles who have 24 dps against tanks compared to the vg's 14 dps. also veterancy means that they will receive -50% received accuracy compared to the volks only get 20%. All in all current rifles with zook are significant more potent then prenerfed volks. so their is no need to nerf volks or to change it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: and idea for okw veterancy1 Feb 2016, 15:54 PM Vet 4-5 is nice but to be honest nearly impossible to acquire and its really not a balance issue. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sov vs OKW: Broken Match up1 Feb 2016, 15:51 PM Jump back to quoted post1 Feb 2016, 14:58 PMwhitesky00 Lol?! are you taking his quote of context? MGs require more micro then mobile main infantry because they require pack up time and has the smallest suppression field width-wise. Yeah a moving is hard is guess. what you describe only goes for the german hmg's and to some extend the 50 cal and vickers. but what your posting is plain old BS when the maxim has nearly instant setup and instant packup time. also far more durable with 2 more members. In the past it was nearly impossible for the okw to defeat maxim spam on urban maps. fortunately this changed with the incendiary nade In: COH2 Balance