Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Designate command tank ability5 Sep 2015, 23:36 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 22:34 PMiTzDusty Are you sure? At least the UI only shows your own units getting buffed, if tahts the case. I mean everything by unit type, it doesn't effect your allies so they at least got that right. It should also be said I had to dig for a good 25 minutes to bloody find the stats and even then it was vague as hell so I'm going to go ahead and say much like other buggy things such as the Scoped Lee Relic went wrong somewhere. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Designate command tank ability5 Sep 2015, 22:27 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 22:08 PMelchino7 Does it only affect tanks? Only own tanks or allied ones too? They left the specification field blank, so it affects everything. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20155 Sep 2015, 19:29 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 19:22 PMOmega_Warrior If you want a 50 range tank killer, that is what the panther is for. It's also the lowest DPS tank in the game next to the firefly, it's for hunting single highly armored tanks, not hordes of tanks. They also have a cheap 50 range TD Okay? That's not a 60 range TD and it just got nerfed. a 70 range heavy tank destroyer Which you can't have at the same time as a Tiger I, hence my point. and a 70 range AT gun Which you can't have at the same time as a Tiger I, assume your talking about the Pak43 (which Ostheer only very rarely uses). Not to mention the best infantry AT in the game. Panzergrens with shrek's haven't been meta in ages. There is no reason to inflate the tiger to deal with absolutely everything. Dude it's just 5 more range, this is just so it can kite a little to deal with the fact the level of AT on the field has ramped up significantly. The Tiger I is not hard to kill by any stretch of the imagination. The pen buff alone makes it better then the IS-2 in every way despite also being cheaper. It's not cheaper. And it's pen is similar to the IS2's, it has 10 less at close and 10 more at far. Not to mention the recent pop cost buff. Which the IS2 also got Buffing it's range even on top of that is just ridiculous and only serves to reduce it's few disadvantages. It got the same buffs all heavy tanks got. I don't want to go back to players building Tigers every single game. As opposed to almost nobody making them? In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20155 Sep 2015, 18:55 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 18:51 PMOmega_Warrior What about USF or a soviet player without a heavy doctrine. The only thing they have to counter a tiger is Tank destroyers and a t vet 2 the only advantage they will have is a measly 5 range. Flanking and kiting is going to be harder for every faction not just brits, and range is a huge buff. Even infantry will find it harder to be near a tiger and tigers are already good enough vs infantry. This is a buff vs everything. Honestly the shear fact that Ostheer has no 60 range tank destroyer is a good reason for the Tiger I to have 45 range, but it shouldn't get more range at Vet 2 like it currently does (which would give the IS2 an advantage over it as Vet 2). They should replace the Tiger I's vet 2 with a survability buff. Flanking a Tiger isn't really necessary, since all the regular TD's and AT guns have a good chance of penetrating it's frontal armor. In: Lobby
Thread: Small tweaks to British teching5 Sep 2015, 18:50 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 18:46 PMUrmel as katitof said in another threat: so volks should cost 300mp bc of their veterancy or obers 600mp or okw p4 which gets a real machine with vet4/5 500 mp 160f ? NO! bc its bullpudding feel free to convince me... In cover Tommies will beat Grens and Volks fairly handily. Tommies also have Panzergren Received Accuracy starting right off the bat and when vetted up have .528 rec acc making them at 5 men one of the most durable squads in the entire game. They also can be upgraded with 2 LMG's non-doctrinally. The only thing Tommies need atm is to have their buggy as Scoped Lee Enfields removed, as of right now all they do is give you less DPS. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20155 Sep 2015, 09:35 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 09:26 AMBurts IS-2 has significantly worse performance againts infantry It has only slightly worse scatter but better AoE and now has less penetration IS2 Pen Profile: 250.0/220.0/190.0 New Tiger I Pen Profile: 240/220/200 more armor. Which has a decent amount more of, 375 on the IS2 to the Tiger I's 300. Honestly the only real problematic thing will be the Tiger have 55 range at Vet 2, should just replace that with a survability buff instead IMO. In: Lobby
Thread: Balance Preview Update 09/04/20155 Sep 2015, 03:44 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 03:43 AMBad_Vader That's more of a design than a balance issue You're forced to choose between hammer or anvil as opposed to the sturmpio always being available. Royal Engineers in general have the same repair speed as Sturms but at 5 men while costing much less. In: Lobby
Thread: Bofors needs a nerf against infantry5 Sep 2015, 03:43 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 03:09 AMelchino7 What's the range ? 45, as a general rule if it is an AA thing it typically fires at a range of 45, except the Ostwind of course. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: balance preview mod rifle buff5 Sep 2015, 01:42 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 00:49 AMsherlock Since when is a shreck an upgrade volks require to compete with other infantry? Last time I checked it was an at weapon that should lower the squads ai capability (excluding rng snipes). Because Volks have nothing else that makes them attractive outside of their ability to carry a shrek. This is complete fiction. First of all there is not an accepted formula. Second of all, all recources are always worth more, not less, in manpower. The only indication that we have in the game, is the Luftwaffe Supply Drop Zone, which grants 150 munition for 200 manpower. This is an exchange rate of 1 ammo being worth 1.33 manpower. If we actually used this exchange rate and not some stuff we just make up we and up with the following: 280 + 120*1.33 = 280 + 160 = 440 (this result ignores that bars need to be researched). Please refrain from completely making stuff up and presenting it as a fact. Yeah I don't know why I thought it was 1 for 3 instead of 1.33 for 1 (happens when your having to make so many points at the same time). Regardless, MP =/= Munitions, and acting like upgrades = manpower is pointless. The fact that BARS are 10 muni to expensive doesn't mean that Rifles need a massive buff to Received Accuracy. Would be nice if you toned down the hostility, was just an honest mistake In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Scoped Lee Enfields bug5 Sep 2015, 01:35 AM Jump back to quoted post5 Sep 2015, 00:36 AMJadame! How scoped lees work? Death crit wounded squads? Do higher damage? Everything at the time? They are just Lee Enfields that sound different and do less DPS because they have a longer cooldown and reload In: COH2 Bugs