Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Let's talk about Volksgrenadiers24 May 2015, 05:27 AM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2015, 02:10 AMelchino7 Not in the case of weapons that can be dropped. Performance of them is only affected by squad modificators. (That is why you shouldnt pick LMG from Partisans) Note: reminder that you shouldn't also pick Bars with SP/Falls/PG You could make the Volks LMG either be unable to be dropped or be inferior to the Ober LMG. And if you picked it up it would still be a "crappier" LMG. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Let's talk about Volksgrenadiers24 May 2015, 00:15 AM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 23:06 PMdasheepeh the thing is that LMG42 is inferior to the 34, even after the nerf. Grens are also more expensive to maintain and only consist of 4 models. The con PPSH is inferior to the Shock One. You can make weapons have different stats for different units. I would be more than happy with Volks costing 280 MP and having a diverse amount of weapon upgrades rather than just being cheap spammable units that exist only to carry a shrek around. Ever try using Volks as your AI? They suck ass at it. If you scared of LMG hordes, well sorry pal those already exist. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.24 May 2015, 00:12 AM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 23:40 PMelchino7 The point is, how good would it be for Axis to have demos, when they have a lot of useful munition sinks in comparison to Soviets. We don't see as much demos with USF since they do have munition sinks and it's commander locked. This sentence doesn't make any sense. USF has a fraction of the munition sinks Ostheer and OKW do and you yourself said we see few demo's from them. If you give Axis demo's (Ostheer standard and OKW in a doctrine); you won't see as many yes but the option will actually be there for players who want to use it. I would much rather have demo charges than useless shit like booby trap point. Think about like this: What exactly is the argument against demo charges for Axis when people have been just beating around the bush going "b-b-but my asymmetrical balance..." which has been long dead since WFA came out. Allies are much more able to field loads of sweepers than Axis are, and have larger squad sizes as to not be punished as much by it. The only people scared of demo's for Axis are the usual crowd AKA TAB, Katitof, ect. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Are guards' DPs worth the muni?24 May 2015, 00:05 AM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 23:49 PMCookiezNcreem Unless the OverLord all knowing Strategist Sarantini told you it wasn't then im pretty sure received accuracy is squad-type specific. I(and others)would be brutally killing original MG crews to get rid of the penalty all day if it wasnt. They do get sight bonus's. A MG42 re crewed with Pio's can see all the way out to it's max range. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Let's talk about Volksgrenadiers23 May 2015, 23:02 PM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 22:39 PMdasheepeh so balanced, 5 volks running around with lmg34's This already exists, they are called Grenadiers. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.23 May 2015, 20:58 PM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 20:49 PMKatitof And what would soviets and USF get in return? When 2 sides have equal amount of tools, you can't just give one armies tools to another without giving anything in return. We've had already this discussion, you didn't produced a valid argument for it then, so please, don't even attempt excusing it again. How is giving Axis access to the same abilities as Allies making things unequal? Are you scared of actually being on the receiving end of demo charges for once? Afraid those USF rifleblobs will start literally going up in smoke? If Allies want access to more stuff, that's fine, but "equality" isn't an argument against the demo charge when mines (Soviets and OKW/USF and Ostheer) being mirrored across factions is already a thing. Give Axis demos, give Allies the ability to put away sweepers sound fair? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.23 May 2015, 20:17 PM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 13:14 PMKatitof Don't know. Why conscripts can't upgrade LMGs by default? Abilities can be mirrored across factions yknow. Both Soviets and OKW lay 30 muni all purpose mines. USF and Ostheer can both lay disabling mines. Giving demo's to Axis would be fine, I don't see what the argument against it is when it's much easier to spam sweepers as Allies than it is as Axis. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.23 May 2015, 11:53 AM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 11:37 AMKurtWilde Lets agree to disagree dude, coz neither of us are going to change our opinions. But the poll shows that most of the people agree with me, so The majority actually agree an upgrade should be needed, but personally I find demo's to be a cheesy way of blob countering. I would much rather see the maxim get a buff. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: USSR FHQ Ability OP23 May 2015, 07:25 AM Jump back to quoted post23 May 2015, 04:42 AMImagelessbean Course, so just post that game where you were completely defeated by OKW getting locked out by FHQ player and let's talk about it. Otherwise, stop theory crafting. Have you ever played on Ettlebruck, Trios Point, or any of the other WFA stone building maps? All of them have large buildings that can take double stuka barrages located in central locations meaning even when you do finally get your Stuka out he's still got a minute and a half of that HQ left. It's not theory crafting, but then again you play nothing but 4's were the FHQ isn't even a problem. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USSR FHQ Ability OP22 May 2015, 22:36 PM Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 21:18 PMImagelessbean No one is saying we want FHQ to remain as is, we are saying it is balanced as is. Cheesey yes, but balanced. If Relic wanted to redesign the commander it would be fine. The commander needs an overhaul to make it really part of the meta. It's not at all balanced, that's the issue. On some maps it can easily prevent OKW from getting anywhere and cause them to lose all map control, on others it's useless. A commander should not be 100% map dependent. Against Ost yeah it's more balanced but it's still a huge pain in the dick if the building that's FHQ'ed is a stone one that is very hard to take down using normal mortars. In: COH2 Gameplay