Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Heavy Tank Limit30 Jun 2015, 22:26 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 22:12 PMAustralian Magic Just stop your fuel math. After 2 schrecks and few mines you have nothing to spend ammo for (just nades but 15-19ammo/min is enough for them) -> fuel conversion all day long. Nothing to spend ammo for? Are you kidding me? OKW has tons of artillery call in abilities that are excellent late game as well as the fact you need to keep upgrading your infantry to make them useful. 90 muni to upgrade Fuss, 60 muni for Obers, ect. And fuel conversion isn't 100% efficient, you will still very much be at a disadvantage income wise. Ignoring OKW fuel penalty is like ignoring fact that Soviet stock units are shitty or that USF have vehicle crews. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Pershing ? 30 Jun 2015, 22:21 PM If the Pershing is put in game and that's a huge if; I really hope Relic is smart enough not to give it the ability to decrew it's self. Pop cap abuse with heavy tanks....shudder In: Lobby
Thread: Stug G vs. Soviet and Allied armor30 Jun 2015, 21:52 PM I still don't see how the Ostwind existence makes it illegal for other things in it's tier to have AI power, considering that a barrage would be more about digging the enemy out of fortified positions which the Ostwind isn't for. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stug G vs. Soviet and Allied armor30 Jun 2015, 21:41 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 21:25 PMQueenRatchet123 NO Ostwind is your AI su76 is in a tier with no dedicated ai tank What is a Katyusha? Dedicated anti tank ? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Heavy Tank Limit30 Jun 2015, 21:40 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 21:22 PMWingZero This is a tough strategy to pull if Axis player pulls out both KT and Jagd. 260+80+40+290 = 670 fuel. With OKW's reduced fuel income that's equivalent to 917 fuel. Yeah, uh, if you are facing down a KT + JT combo something went wrong somewhere on your end vis a vis map control. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stug G vs. Soviet and Allied armor30 Jun 2015, 21:18 PM The ability for it to shoot through shot blockers (even if was just a single use ability) would be broken on so many different levels. Just give it a Vet 1 barrage, mirror it to the SU-76 barrage if you want. The fact of the matter remains that: 1. TWP is very abusable 2. Negates good medium armor play 3. The SU-76 barrage is by no means OP From those points I conclude that Vet 1 for the StuG III Ausf G being a bombardment would not be OP. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Stug G vs. Soviet and Allied armor30 Jun 2015, 20:07 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 20:05 PMAerohank Immunity to stunlock would only help IS-2s and T34/85s. All USF tanks and all soviet stock tanks are still killed without counterplay by 1 (in case of light tanks) or 2 mobile Stug Gs. Seriously, I've been playing quite a few games as Ostheer and every time there was some sherman or T34/76 harassing me at a flank, I would move in with my 2 StugGs, fire a TWP round right of the bat and the enemy tanks fate was sealed even before he could see me. It's pretty broken. Yeah it would probably be more interesting to just give the StuG III some AI power with a Vet 1 barrage/bombardment. It might make it to much like the SU-76 but well it IS an Assault Gun and it should some sort of AI/Artillery capability. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: US need more now.30 Jun 2015, 20:01 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 19:57 PMQueenRatchet123 I proved that your point is bullshit. simple. Reketen is in t1, can retreat, can enter garrisons, and can cloak. Stop complaining and git gud. It's not complaining? I was just pointing out that rushing a Puppchen can put OKW had a big handi-cap when starting out because they will have very little capping power/AI power. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Stug G vs. Soviet and Allied armor30 Jun 2015, 20:00 PM The suggestion that interested me the most so far was making it so once you get it by TWP you are immune to stuns for a certain amount of time meaning that you can no longer be stunlocked by multiple Pak's or StuG III's. Although it would be cool as Das suggested to give the StuG III a bombardment/explosive round for Vet 1 allowing it to help deal with enemy fortified positions. It is an Assault Gun after all and the SU-76 did get to retain it's anti-infantry barrage. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: US need more now.30 Jun 2015, 19:54 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Jun 2015, 19:46 PMQueenRatchet123 It is false. You cant conveniently exclude the mp on the field to support your, again, false point. Less units means less capping power. But this isn't germane to the discussion at hand (USF) so I kindly ask we stop this derail. My only point was merely rushing a Puppchen can put the hurt on OKW MP wise. In: COH2 Balance