Profile of Alexzandvar

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 4951 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561198026003886


Thread: Balance Data Since The Patch8 Jul 2015, 16:53 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2015, 16:19 PMvan Voort As opposed to the ideas of top players like Quentin and that Chinese gentleman whose name eludes me who are clearly too awesome for our tiny minds to comprehend. Quentin being totally incomprehensible doesn't mean all top players are. Which I'm starting to think was a terrible mistake because it created an belief that COH2 would be balanced in the same way You mean it created the belief Relic could demonstrate competence, yes. Don't blame me I voted for Kodos and I don't feel the urge to support anyone else in their internet warring just because I wear the same clantags I don't blame anyone in general In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Average mortar...8 Jul 2015, 12:45 PM The MG42 getting a price increase alone would be perfectly fine with me, it's just adding a mortar price increase on top of it is were you lose me. EDIT: The Maxim and Dhsk need help independent of this of course. Like I said buffs my man not nerfs! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Ostheer HMG too strong now8 Jul 2015, 12:43 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2015, 12:38 PMKatitof Thats because pfuss have excellent scaling, great upgrade and rifle AT nade as well as infantry flares and nades. Penals lack most of their utility, they would simply be a squad that actually can fight from green cover on long range, while still being best at mid/short and would be competely helpless vs armor, so AT support would still be needed. I can't see a single negative side to making penals that way outside of annual QQ fest about another soviet stock unit suddenly being able to fight something cost effectively. Well trading the satchel charge for the useless rifle AT nade would probably make some people mad. The damn thing hasn't worked in ages. That shit nade is pretty much the only downside to Fuss. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: PSA: Window count of buildings no longer matter8 Jul 2015, 12:38 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2015, 12:35 PMKatitof No, they didn't attempted anything since there is no patch note for it. They simply fucked up without excuse. I never said they had an excuse, but it's really obvious they did something. Also seriously? When has anyone ever trusted patch notes Katitof? In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF superglue on tanks8 Jul 2015, 12:36 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2015, 12:32 PMKatitof That makes as much sense as saying OKW units after vet3 should have a chance to get brain meltdwon and instantly die on their way to vet5 if hit because they couldn't contain all their 1337ness. It would be functionally the same as decrewing and using the superglue (you get a chance of being decrewed if the enemy shoots your crew), it could just cost 30-40 muni and take 4-5 seconds. The upside of it would be it would be a lot less buggy and easier to balance because it's a lot less steps to go through. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Average mortar...8 Jul 2015, 12:34 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2015, 12:27 PMcomm_ash If a player decides that they don't want support weapons, they are giving up most of their early game power. Grens simply cannot clear sandbags and buildings easily, nor can they hold off rifles. Its a choice that they make. ( see my post one page ago). Giving grens a 5th man and 280 mp is a terrible idea. Grens already have higher dps than conscripts at close range. The only reason they lose is because the cons have more models. 5 man grens would beat cons at all ranges, and directly feed the grenspam you just said you don't want. All you would be doing is giving ostheer great early game infantry, exceedingly cost efficient support weapons, and 0 drawbacks. Players will decide they don't want support weapons based on cost efficiency, if the MG42 and Mortar cost a lot people will just get a few grens out and rush t2. It would make Ostheer in smaller game modes harder to play and still piss easy in team games. It would also make reinforcing more hellish than it already is, to many model losses can drain away all your MP early game very quickly making come backs hard. Personally I think the 4 man squad nature of Ostheer makes it way to vulnerable to squad wipes (USF shouldn't have 4 man squads either), and paying more MP for the same DPS but more durability sounds like a fair trade all things considered. But ultimately I think the best solution is just to give the other side buffs instead of giving Ost nerfs, the reason Ostheer is so good right now compared to the other factions is that they got the most Alpha buffs of any faction. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USF superglue on tanks8 Jul 2015, 12:28 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2015, 09:16 AMAustralian Magic Well... Few times I saw Luchs finishing KV8, T34 or SU85 ___ Let's just remove superglue and give USF something else. USF could just have emergency crew repairs so the crew takes a few seconds doing internal repairs but if the tank gets hit it gets decrewed. That way it's less buggy and easier to balance than decrewing. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Ostheer HMG too strong now8 Jul 2015, 12:24 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2015, 09:10 AMKatitof Well, sucks to be them then. Molo will have to learn 2nd BO in 2 years? What a tragedy! If penals were to become a proper infantry(just slap them 280-290 mp cost and performance similar to pfussies/rifles) and maxim gets its fixes, soviet stock units should be in good enough shape to finally open some freedom in doctrine choices after tech changes. Penals being Pfuss is a fairly interesting idea, would need balancing because Pfuss spam is very much in the meta right now. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet Average mortar...8 Jul 2015, 12:20 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2015, 03:46 AMClassyDavid I can see that, the increase of MP for certain Wehrmacht units. After all, they are meant to represent a better trained and equipped army so increasing MP for their performance would work and make sense compared to the cheaper Allied counterparts. No balance changes and be acceptable due to the increase cost. Wehrmacht is already the most MP intensive faction in game the game currently, if anything I would like to see Grens get a 5th man and be made 280 mp (with the same DPS just spread out more) to make Ostheer's mainline infantry less wipey. A price increase to support weapons would just lead to more gren spam, which is awful as anyone who plays against CAS often will tell you. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: PSA: Window count of buildings no longer matter8 Jul 2015, 12:15 PM Jump back to quoted post8 Jul 2015, 12:11 PMluvnest Oh man why did they change that in the first place? They attempted to make it so larger squads could use buildings correctly (you can tell they changed how entering buildings works to), but I guess they made an oopsie somewhere. In: COH2 Gameplay