Profile of TheSleep3r

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 670

General Information


Thread: T-34 needs a buff7 Jun 2015, 07:26 AM Jump back to quoted post7 Jun 2015, 06:14 AMPorygon Best option is giving upgun upgrade like COH1 Sherman, or vet 2 into T-34/85. not gonna happen relic is trying to keep up the look of real warfare, they stated this multiple times (even if the gameplay itself is ultra wtf) and t-34 werent able to just upgrade its gun, they had to remove the whole turret and replace it with one with bigger diameter 85 fuel then In: COH2 Balance
Thread: New game mechanics you'd like to see?3 Jun 2015, 22:28 PM Jump back to quoted post3 Jun 2015, 22:23 PMAlexzandvar Could be an actually good game mechanic were everyone has reduced sight to stop LMG spam. You mean blizzards? On the other hand the interface should be standardized. In EFA we have 'special command troops' and 'new vehicles, press and click to deploy' while in WFA it's just the definition. I like the latter. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: New game mechanics you'd like to see?3 Jun 2015, 21:31 PM you have been visited by qt π cynthia good balance and cool new mechanics will come to you, but only if you post I HATE WARSPOILS in this thread In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: No tech demo just poor design.2 Jun 2015, 17:49 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Jun 2015, 17:10 PMDomine Teching for the demo is not going tochange the situation. It will simply delay it a bit, that's all. It will not stop it from wiping your squads. I would be for maybe lowering the damage to non squadwipe-levels and adding surpression that automatically pins a unit so you'll have to retreat it. Change the cost accordingly. Why not add suppression to all mines, like in coh1 to reward flanking? Infantry reactions were removed a while ago In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Jackson spam31 May 2015, 10:33 AM Jump back to quoted post31 May 2015, 07:45 AMJason You USF guys have fun playing against a nerfed into the ground Ostheer then. A Jackson cost 125 fuel and hard counters a tank that costs 640 mp and 230 fuel. Whether a loiter strafe destroys 1 jackson or not is irrelevant, its easily replaceable. The cost-effectiveness ratio is unbalanced. Ofcourse lets ignore that and sling insults. By the same token a 125 fuel P4 should be able to challenge an IS2.. Ofcourse not. What is wrong with you, why are you pointing out that Tiger costs 640 mp but skipping that part where Jackson costs 350 mp? 2*350=700, math sure is hard. Also what the fuck about the last part, Jackson is a dedicated tank destroyer, it has no ai while pz4 is a reliable, generalist medium tank In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Demo Charges are fun.30 May 2015, 22:15 PM Jump back to quoted post30 May 2015, 21:56 PMAlexzandvar Are you kidding? Soviets have almost 0 early game munition abilities so making demos ASAP is easy. If your wasting munitions so you don't have demo's as soon as you can get them your doing it wrong. Since you want to blow bridges, house, and enemy squads to turn the game as fast as you can. This shows how bad are soviets designed Give cons ppshs after t3/t4 (or t3 only, if you know what I mean ) and give commanders with these weapons armored vehicle detection, mark vehicle or anything really. Buffing cons' ppsh at medium distance (to avoid OPness) and increasing the price greatly would be also helpful in reducing muni float I don't really know what to do with molos, since they are designed to deny cover and not be grenades. If the opponent does not use cover or the map lacks it they lose their usefulness and thus are skipped (or they are skipped because they are shit, but that's another question) In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Demo Charges are fun.28 May 2015, 14:13 PM Jump back to quoted post26 May 2015, 21:48 PMelchino7 or having it reworked and give the Soviets some late game scaling munition dumps. This is what happens when you are a Relic balance designer with a simple task of creating good faction: you fail to do so. Or more accurately, you design a faction, and then have to redesign it several times to make it even playable (see: upcoming OKW) -molos not being a real grenade and behind a paywall: check -penals, the supposed 'stock elite infantry' have nearly the same role and efficiency as cons, also flamethrowers as upgrade: check -ppsh, goddamn ppsh behind a damn doctrine? check -guards got free ptrs: check -shocks got free posh: check But we have next patch so things are gonna get bolshye In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Yeap Relic .50 cal HMG get destroyed by 2 rifle nades24 May 2015, 21:54 PM Jump back to quoted post24 May 2015, 18:57 PMiTzDusty Incendiary mortars can't melt steel beams kek In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: USSR FHQ Ability OP22 May 2015, 21:57 PM Forward HQ is definitely OP. I still remember that one match >1v1 on kholodny >i use forward hq on the church >pios see it >enemy shows his tension >he writes something about chromosomes for sale in the chat >i ignore it, i have plenty of chromosomes, surely much more than him >the enemy goes full mortar >he spams like 5 mortars >only pios capping >i try to use this to my advantage >my first unit is molotov upgrade >i see 7 mortars trying to get that church, constantly missing >demo kills pios, i got full map control now >the enemy writes about damn forward hqs that always grant map control early game >i ignore that comment and go for my second unit >the at grenade >the hq has only 25 percent of hp >you appear suited for command >almost over of the match, i foresee panther rush >i spam m42s >the forward hq finally crashes >i feel drops of sweat on my forehead >i see burst of laughter in the chat >the people anticipate our victory >he tries to cap vps >i booby trapped them >i fear the defeat, try to rush base with m42s and utilize molotovs >victory >how, i can't believe it And I come here and see shitposts like the HQ is OK. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Squad Spacing22 May 2015, 10:04 AM Jump back to quoted post22 May 2015, 10:00 AMturbotortoise What was the rationale for the changes made to squad spacing? As far as I can remember the changes seemed to be made with the release of the WFA, despite personally never thinking squad ai was ever really an issue, up until this point... I guess it's sorta cool that paras move in a triangle, but... well I don't need to go into the downsides. I would have prioritized vehicle pathing. I was just wondering if Relic in patch notes, or what have you, ever explained why this was a change they felt they needed to implement and what they were trying to accomplish with it. Or was it simply an oops? I don't know. It's a side effect of making infantry squads hug cover. In: COH2 Gameplay