He means that a medium tank is not supposed to take an heavy one alone.
And IS2 will still not care of P4 Vet 2, cause he will always penetrate him.
this
And he attempted to use that as an argument that change is not needed.
Its not unwise, its plain dumb.
That is like saying we shouldn't buff 222, because it'll lose to T-70 anyway.
That kind of argument doesn't make any sense at all.
why are you putting words in my mouth m8? i only said better vet bonuses will not be as relevant as other buffs because some of the vetted tanks will be destroyed which nullify the buff; the context was other buffs should be used instead m8
And he attempted to use that as an argument that change is not needed.
Its not unwise, its plain dumb.
since when do you know better what i attempt to do than me? kek
That is like saying we shouldn't buff 222, because it'll lose to T-70 anyway.
what the actual fuck |
if medium tanks are supposed to take losses in an attempt on destroying one heavy, then why to increase vet bonuses? you'll have to replace them anyway starting from vet 0 |
You're the most pathetic kind of bully, sucking up to the powers that be and hassling the rest, on the internet no less, kinda escapes me what you even look to get from that, especially as you don't even actually play this game.
ayy lmao |
How do I multi-quote?
You have to do it manually in advanced post editor, thanks to the best forum engine |
People will always pick axis over allies because they are more fun.
[citation needed]
I'll tell you m8, I'm having a blast here with my beloved Soviets. |
Thats what everyone in this thread is doing, dunno if you noticed but mulriplayer in coh is 1944-45, people are acting like t34/76s should be superior to the panzer4s.
they should not, but once again, if they are in the game they have the right to not be complete shit
alex's idea was actually pretty neat, as it solves both problems of t34, it sucks versus tanks cuz low pen and crushes infantry better than shoots them. its a life failure in this game and if it had a father he would be ashamed and t34/85 would get all the candies |
I know that feeling...
Speaking for myself there is no map where I think 'Great! I love this one!'
It's more a feeling between 'Well, okay' and 'Meh..'
that feel when I love Stalingrad |
No the only reason people praise the t34 is because the soviet industry and economy could mass produce anything they wanted. Guarantee that if germany was the one to make the t34/76 and could only produce maybe 12-15 thousand of them we would call them idiots for making such a shit tank. Anything is good if you can make enough of them. I mean 48,000 of the 55,000 t34s made were destroyed. Not a good tank, was shit. t34/85 is the only good tank there.
high kek
t34 were praised for its original design back in 1941, where they were excellent versus panzer 3s and short barreled panzer 4s
its design was revolutionary, but you just had to compare it to its relevance in 1944 and power of panthers |
Their is nothing wrong with the t-34 however.
My focus would be on the su85 and su76
dayum son, where did you find this?
su85 are fine when used in formations, not spammed one being a feet away from the another and su76m's are going to get a fix soon
but t-34 sure have problems |
Does Relic address this in the new patch? The game depth would be phenomenal with Sov/Ost, OKW/USF/Brit enemy chatter. I am tired of hearing "my leg my leg".
I remember they wrote about fixing so many bugs they didn't put a fix list (ok mods this is not nda), and they said they are working on it on TWO twitch streams.
I've been fighting to make them fix this since its introduction so I actually know what they said if they somehow don't fix it on 23rd I'm gonna be furious |