Profile of Butcher

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 1217

General Information
Broadcast: https://www.twitch.tv/butcher_ger


Thread: Ostheer - The Dead Circle vs USF22 Sep 2016, 11:02 AM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2016, 19:43 PMAustralian Magic Ostheer is my favourite faction but currently they are helpless vs USF. Ostheer was designed as a static faction: Grens with LMGs need to stand still. PzGrens (hardly assault unit, works better when you let enemy close to you). All basic infantry units need to stand still to be effective. Panzergrenadiere were overnerfed. Or to word it better: They were balanced when Soviets were the only Allied faction in the game. Then US and UK came in with their double Bars and Brens which totally outclass PGs and make it suicidal to close in. PGs could need a great increase in their health to be able to withstand this firepower. LMG Grens can at least fire back with one MG42. PGs are an absolute liability. Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2016, 19:43 PMAustralian Magic It's not a deal versus Soviets since OST and SU have really good balance between. Thus I think alongside with buffed PGs Conscripts should get something for the lategame. Once T4 is set up there should be a single DP-28 upgrade for 50 munitions. PGs would turn into an upgrade from Grens and thus both factions would have to offer a bit more lategame. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: We are Katitof20 Sep 2016, 17:22 PM He kinda reminded me of this legenedary dude and his legendary thread 10 years ago. People even founded the IS-2 religion. http://forums.tripwireinteractive.com/forum/off-topic/history/7159-is-2-greatest-tank-of-ww2 In: Scrap Yard
Thread: Tank Destroyer Time to Kill stats20 Sep 2016, 15:46 PM Jump back to quoted post20 Sep 2016, 14:08 PMZombiFrancis Quick question, why would your opponent start massing unturreted Tank Destroyers if you're building unturreted Tank Destroyers or vice versa? If I saw my opponent building SU85s I'd build a few paks or get pgrens with schrecks instead of StuGs. Not what I do. A StuG III almost hard counters the new SU-85 with the slower rate of fire. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Tank Destroyer Time to Kill stats18 Sep 2016, 18:03 PM We are complaining on the forum that the Panther is underperforming for about a year now and this is news? The StuG is the only thing that keeps Ostheer in the game at the moment. I wouldn´t touch the StuG at all. It´s finally useful after two years. It blows up qickly itself and is the definition of a glass cannon. I think it´s quite amusing your conculsion is that the Panther should get nerfed armor and that the StuG is overperfroming. Ostheer is crippled. And the reason is the Panther. Buffing its damage and reducing its armor with vet will even out and you are still stuck with a useless unit. Another glass cannon in the Ostheer arsenal isn´t needed. It´s a Panther ffs. The armor bonus was already nerfed years ago and is only a shadow of its former self. The Panther needs straight out buffs in a time of buffed Allied AT + Brits. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: GG Redesign/Rebalance Mod17 Sep 2016, 10:50 AM I don´t get why the Grenadiers shouldn´t have the MG42 upgrade any longer? It was the most iconic feature of German squads to have MGs equipped for every squad. You are spot on with your description of the Panther. I like your idea of giving it a better rate of fire at the cost of range. Yet getting rid of the Vet2 bonuses is not right. That was the only saving grace for the Panther. You are turning it into a glass cannon role. All in all good changes though. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Verisimilitude11 Sep 2016, 18:33 PM I don´t like what the Panther has become in Coh2. It was famous for excelling on range, taking out tanks more than 2km away. Here it gets outranged by Su-76s, Su-85, Fireflies, Jacksons etc. Instead you are supposed to use it as a nascar and drive into the enemy - a role which Panther crews avoided like the pest. It suffered from the conditions in the narrow hedges of Normandy. I think it should be redesigned completely. Long live 2013. In: Lobby
Thread: News from Relic incoming? 11 Sep 2016, 18:26 PM Jump back to quoted post11 Sep 2016, 17:29 PMNeris Yeah. I haven't seen worse company than Relic. The worst experience I have ever had in history of my gaming. Imo that title goes to EA Games. Throwing out a new title of every series every year. So the community is split. Stopping the support after 1-2 years. I remember buying Battle for Middle Earth 2 in 2006 and I wasn´t able to play it a year later online since all the servers were down. In: Lobby
Thread: News from Relic incoming? 11 Sep 2016, 09:44 AM Jump back to quoted post10 Sep 2016, 19:49 PMBasilone You obviously haven't played CSGO, or a MOBA, or a AAA sports game, or GTA, or DayZ, or COD...what have you played? I think a better classification of this community is either twitch dwellers and/or self proclaimed WW2 history experts. I´m actually playing CSGO. Though I play in a queue with 4 friends. Russians make anything else impossible. I don´t know why they flood all the games based on teamplay where communication is most important... only to refuse to speak English. Yet in CSGO you can mute Russians. Smurfs are also a big problem. Yet despite all these shortcomings I don´t see the community throwing as much shit at the developers as here. In: Lobby
Thread: News from Relic incoming? 10 Sep 2016, 14:16 PM This is the most toxic community I´ve ever been part of. I´m not complaining or judging anybody. It´s just an observation. In: Lobby
Thread: Panther(both factions) vs Comet 9 Sep 2016, 12:55 PM All that needs to be done to fix the lategame advantage the Allies have: - Ostheer Panther gets OKW Panther stats (MGs and accuracy). Both Panthers reload a little bit faster so they aren´t a downgrade from the Panzer IV in dps. - Tiger I gets 30 more frontal armor. - British tank commander upgrade costs 50 munitions. - Panzer IV gets a price reduction to 120 fuel, 145 fuel respectively. See how this ends up. It´s just minor adjustments. In: COH2 Balance