Profile of butterfingers158

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 239

General Information


Thread: Fury Movie! Tiger vs Sherman2 Dec 2014, 22:09 PM Jump back to quoted post2 Dec 2014, 21:32 PMkamk Kinda curious where you got your information from. A 76mm M1 couldn't penetrate a Tiger front properly, especially not at 800(?) yards. Good, but rare, HVAP were mostly used for designated TDs. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Fury Movie! Tiger vs Sherman1 Dec 2014, 07:15 AM At the range they were fighting the 76mm high velocity on Fury would have had no problem going through the front of a Tiger In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Deflection Damage 16 Nov 2014, 21:10 PM There is already deflection damage in the game, just not every unit/ability does it. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 15 Nov 2014, 10:32 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Nov 2014, 07:41 AMBabaRoga You need full army to take on single super heavy wondering around without any support. Whats not clear there? Sarcasm on the internet is never clear. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Obersoldaten and stuff15 Nov 2014, 02:06 AM Jump back to quoted post15 Nov 2014, 00:24 AMB4Z00K4 People treat OKW and his units like they're regular Wehr units. To beat OKW, you NEED to push 'em hard, NEVER EVER give OKW player a break. And, of course, compensate quality with numbers. You CAN'T 1V1 OKW units (Especialy elite units). If he builds a panther, you need 3 t-34's. If he buils Obers, build 2 shocks/Guards. Drag his manpower and won't we able to reinforce his units (Obers cost 50mp to reinforce per model). It's hard, yes, but there's nothing more gratificant than a scuad of shock troopers waiting for retreating OKW units at his medtruck. So what you're saying is... to win Allies need to spend more resources and more popcap Seems balanced In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 13 Nov 2014, 09:15 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 08:49 AMGreenDevil Your only problem is that you are obviously not keeping your infantry alive and getting vet. If you had a BAR blob of rifles or some cons with ppsh or even shocks, then volks with Shreks are not a problem, therefore tank battles should not be a problem for you. See the flow on effect? If only vet 5 Volks were a 5 man squad with .5751 received accuracy to survive and OKW had an elite Infantry squad that melts Riflemen. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: JU-87 Strafe shredding tanks.13 Nov 2014, 09:10 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 08:45 AMGreenDevil I think it's one of those abilities that is a little strong in 1v1's, but in 2v2 and higher Axis need it to deal with a 2-3 Jacksons attacking your position, backed by lend lease Shermans or T34-85's, Axis can be easily overwhelmed by sheer weight of numbers and this ability helps a lot. Did you just seriously suggest that Axis needs help in late game during team games? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 13 Nov 2014, 08:09 AM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 07:17 AMJohnnyB *Anyway, zookas and schrecks are a start-game / middle game matter. The thing that is affecting the meta and may create inbalance on some maps is the thikness of Axis supertanks, the start game and middle game is still dominated by Allied, even if Axis have better hand held AT weapons. So nerfing these weapons won't bring any good I think. This really isn't true in my opinion. See the super tanks are indeed thick from the front, but if you get a flank they go down pretty easy. Problem is you can't get a flank when your 480 HP Jackson gets 1 shot from the 4 volks supporting the Jagdtiger (as an example). Nerfing Axis hand held AT would indeed (in my opinion) help the meta, as it would allow for medium tanks to flank the Tigers/Panthers/Jagdtigers/Elefants/King Tigers and not get A-moved by the supporting infantry. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Luchs and 2225 Nov 2014, 22:34 PM Jump back to quoted post5 Nov 2014, 20:35 PMBrick Top Because when you field a Luchs, you could field a P4. Wasn't aware of the huge amount of 9 minute P4s running around In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Sherman pintle gunner upgrade price decrease4 Nov 2014, 09:07 AM Jump back to quoted post4 Nov 2014, 08:36 AMMr. Someguy It also has higher DPS than it's MG 42 counterpart. Plus, the Sherman has HE Shells with good effect. http://www.coh2-stats.com/small_arms/mg42_turret_mounted_pziv_mp http://www.coh2-stats.com/small_arms/sherman_m10_m36_m2hb_50cal_mounted_tank_mp Assuming these are the correct profiles, the P4 MG-42 does more DPS at long and point blank range than the Sherman .50 cal. The HE shells should have no impact on the price of the top gunner upgrade so no idea why you even mentioned that. Should just normalize all the top gunners at 60 imo, no idea why some are 50 and some are 70 In: COH2 Balance