Profile of NinjaWJ

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2070

General Information


Thread: Mark Target14 Nov 2014, 16:54 PM Jump back to quoted post14 Nov 2014, 16:44 PMRomeo Your sarcasm is not constructive. If you disagree with my proposed changes, you should discuss what you disagree with and why, or come up with a better solution. I have already, and so have others. It isn't imbalanced and it is an essential ability that helps even the odds against heavier Axis tanks. I don't think the synergy with the B4 is OP, it just works well together and requires communication/good skill. There are already ways that you can deal with Mark Target. You an reverse out, smoke out, or blitz out, or simply kill everything. Reversing is the most easy, because the opponent will have dumped a lot of munitions for nothing. If you stay and fight while being marked, it isn't a guarantee that you will not get stunned, engine damaged, etc., which can further lead to the tanks demise. Additionally, if you got surrounded by flanking tanks or backed into a corner and got mark targeted, it isn't mark targets fault, the opponent simply played better or someone made a mistake. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: A problem with Casemates,pathing (deep snow)14 Nov 2014, 16:41 PM Yeah the pathfinding for the SU85 is pitiful. It desperately needs a buff Vielsam is like Hill 331 but with deep snow In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target14 Nov 2014, 16:34 PM WHile we are at it, lets nerf button and bombing strike as well because they synergize to well with each other and other abilities In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target14 Nov 2014, 07:34 AM Jump back to quoted post14 Nov 2014, 07:24 AM☭ Калашникова ☭ The effect has always been fine but not ending from the plane being shot down has always in my eyes at least has been a bug. and then the pane gets shot down before it enters the battlefield by the OKW flaktruck #counterplay In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The imbalance between Allied and Axis Infantry Anti-tank 13 Nov 2014, 22:31 PM So does this mean Relic is completely incompetent In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target13 Nov 2014, 22:28 PM THe ability aint broken in 3v3 and 4v4. Panthers and KTs dominate those game modes. It is needed. What else is there to fight those tanks? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target13 Nov 2014, 18:52 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 18:43 PMBurts Well, once non doctrinal soviet vehicles aren't metal coffins, then i am fine with mark target increasing penetration instead of damage. However, until soviet non doctrinal vehicles are unable to do anything, it must stay as it is. Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 18:49 PM☭ Калашникова ☭ The primary problem me and my team on my stream was talking about this very thing about a week ago, The problem being that a lot of allied tanks are 2 shotable. These tanks need to be brought up to at least 3 shot range. Now when you look at the medium like the P4 attacking a Jackson that can take up to 4-5 shots. but when you go up to ELE or JT or KT its a 2 shot. this adds so many problems. SU-86 and T34/76 is in the same boat as well. Well i like that the Elefant and Jagd so that much damage. Feels authentic BUT considering Axis have other good support AT weapons around.. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target13 Nov 2014, 18:41 PM Let those Axis heavies roam free! Freedom freedom! Deustchland uber alles! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Study on APM?13 Nov 2014, 18:31 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 18:29 PM☭ Калашникова ☭ It's certainly annoying in high APM games but a game like CoH2 the apm count's are so low that it doesn't matter normally. True, i feel that the impact is less in COH2, but it would make for interesting reading/discussion In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Mark Target13 Nov 2014, 18:19 PM Jump back to quoted post13 Nov 2014, 17:52 PMRomeo How frequently the synergies occur is not really relevant. They are possible, they are overpowered, and they need to be changed. Just because something isn't seen that often doesn't mean it should be left alone forever (see SU-76). That's because soviet late game is too strong. Double soviets was nearly unbeatable in the SCC. I also support buffs to almost all soviet core units. Do you really enjoy relying 90% on commander features to have any chance of winning a game?. It is a different league than the SU76. The SU76 already exists as a unit. It is up to the player to build it or not. But the situation you are saying requires the stars to be aligned: the right units, the right vet, the right positioning, etc. Soviet late game too strong? That is hilarious. Maybe in 1v1, but you are saying the Mark Target is the the reason why Soviet late game is so good in 2v2+? That. Soviets lack that late game punch, unless you have a bunch of ISUs around. You aren't making the commander-dependent soviets any better by changing the mark target. In: COH2 Balance