Profile of NinjaWJ

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 2070

General Information


Thread: How long we have to face ISU witch one shoot everyhting?18 Aug 2014, 16:15 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2014, 16:04 PMSUCKmyCLOCK Honestly, all jokes aside, are you serious? I am offering a way to counter it. why do you have to be so rude? you say that ISU will have support, but Axis players also support their armor as well. Both sides have artillery to clean out the support units. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!18 Aug 2014, 16:02 PM Hmm m didn't this armor reduction happen a month ago? Obersoldaten still seem amazing to me! In: COH2 Balance
Thread: How long we have to face ISU witch one shoot everyhting?18 Aug 2014, 16:00 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2014, 15:28 PMSUCKmyCLOCK "ISU not OP just flank it" - give me a break, no allied fanboy wants to mention the mines + Guards + button + zis + maxim + Bomb drop combo that goes with any ISU. "You have the jadg or elephant they are the exact same, if you nerf the ISU you got to neft them" - As it has been stated already the only thing that the ISU has in common with these units is that they all have long range. "Use paks you noob!" - do I really need to explain why this is not anyway viable! It is always the same rhetoric from 4-5 allied fanboys with Katitof leading the possie. Look I play 2v2s mainly, I play allies and axis equally and Soviets believe it or not are my fav faction! But there is an UNDENIABLE issue with the ISU, it is over performing, that is a fact. It has only a single reliable counter, the JT. Without that, GG against any decent player. Any unit that has only a single reliable counter is OP period. The JT gets insta shock once hit, and has zero AI capabilities, same goes for the elephant (w/o shock). The ISU needs to be brought in line , either make it an AI unit with its current damage output to inf with the same AT damage as the brumbar. OR have it do the current AT damage with severely decreased AI damage output. It cant continue to be a counter to EVERYTHING (except JT). Remeber the Tiger Ace when it first came out? Same situation. People who say the ISU cannot be flanked because there is support are forgetting something...you have your own support units too!!! In fact, Axis have better AT troops than Soviets. Schrecks do so much more damage than PTRS!! ISU will hurt you a lot if you attack it from the front and then stall your attack. The ISU does not have very strong armor; it is almost the definition of glass cannon. Use your troops to screen your AT and don't bunch up your men. As you are doing that, move your heavy armor up or flank the ISU with faster tanks. 1. ISU will turn to fight your flankers or stay and shoot your infantry 2. Infantry can get off some schreck volleys and damage ISU 3. Flanking armor can get in some shots off versus ISU 4. Sneak in some AT guns or heavy tanks to blast it from the front 5. Dead ISU or retreating ISU In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Problem of Axis in Teamgames18 Aug 2014, 13:04 PM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2014, 11:29 AMCannonade Quoted. Im not even going to comment on what this kind of attitude entails in gameplay and balance discussion. Everyone can draw their own conclusions for themselves. I think what wong is saying is that annoying soviet strats exist because playing combined arms or reliance on conscripts means an uphill battle In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: JagdPanzer IV vs SU8518 Aug 2014, 03:11 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2014, 03:02 AMNapalm This fits into my Soviet Core faction design discussion. The SU85 needs to be updated taking into the A) armor changes after buffs to various units B) new armor units introduced in the WFA expansion. where is it? i would like to read it In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Action Items: Balance Feedback Required!18 Aug 2014, 02:17 AM Jump back to quoted post17 Aug 2014, 05:28 AMWarthrone Rifle LMG are melting obers after Armor nerf. Sigh* where is the changelog In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Problem of Axis in Teamgames18 Aug 2014, 02:11 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2014, 02:05 AMwongtp the pak vs zis rof difference even unvetted, is significant. still ill take a pak any day over a zis, im sure most people can agree with me. use grens to get sight on rifles and mg42 deploy at max range, smoke wont save them when they are already caught by the mg42 except to cover themselves from getting shot up further. use this chance to relocate mg42 and grens focus down on squads trying to flank, standard vcoh wehr play. i play loads of 2v2 as allies and quite enough as axis to have experience on them. i know what you mean, but sadly, as long as they dont buff conscripts and fix the initial infantry advantage that okw has (okw can have volks and sturmpios on the field while soviet have conscripts and engrs), cheap tricks are here to stay. without m3, kubels are extremely strong and cannot be taken out by cons/maxims. without m3/maxim, soviets will lose all infantry fights. its a complete uphill battle without m3. maxim advantage can be negated based on maps, garrisoning buildings usually works well. this man is top 10 2v2!!! he speaks the truth!!!! In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How long we have to face ISU witch one shoot everyhting?18 Aug 2014, 02:04 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2014, 01:45 AMwongtp it works the same for soviets to counter JT or elefants. without a super long range unit, we are gimped. on top of that soviet infantry has nothing over their german counterparts with everyone decked out in lmgs or are super durable through vet. if 1 must go, all super long range tanks must go, which is imo the best solution. without isu152 to stop infantry and provide AT support against tanks, there will be nothing stopping the jagd/elefants from rolling tanks while german infantry steamrolling soviet ones. i don't think the PTRS can penetrate or KT or JGT. I think we can agree that Axis AT infantry are better than Soviet In: COH2 Balance
Thread: The Problem of Axis in Teamgames18 Aug 2014, 01:38 AM I think USA and USSR need to be reorganized. Kinda lame that Soviet is so commander dependent to deal with Axis lategame. Only doctrines with heavy tanks get picked In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How long we have to face ISU witch one shoot everyhting?18 Aug 2014, 01:35 AM Jump back to quoted post18 Aug 2014, 01:19 AMLemonJuice except for the fact that the KT has a much shorter range and costs significantly more to make than an ISU thats true, however (not to add more excuses but i think this is reasonable point), German tanks have the advantage of support troops armed with antitank rockets. ISU armor is quite weak compared to Jagd, Elefant, and KT. It can't take many hits. KT shots will hurt the ISU a lot, plus AT infantry can make it hell for an ISU. In: COH2 Balance