Profile of StephennJF

I always say my traditional 'heyya, glhfhfhfhfhfhfhf' at the start of games. However, I do not take offense when an opponent does not respond but I still keep it in my memory for how to judge them post game and it influences how I may react to them.

If a person that says 'glhf' says something bad at the end or blames the game I do not hold poor opinion of them, unless I play them again and they do the same thing. Sometimes we all get frustrated at the game and might vent some rage in a silly manner at an opponent, even though it is not their fault. I understand this and brush it off.

If a person that does not say 'glhf', says nothing during game then explodes into rage in the last minute I regard them as an idiot and a rage quitter. Typically these players leave the game without saying 'gg', unless they win the game. I tend to just send these kind of people smiley faces when they behave like this but now I am beginning to strike back (which is bad) but I am sort of fed up with this behaviour. Hopefully if chat is reintroduced back into replays people might think twice.

You would also be surrprised how many players don't actually say 'glhf' yet will still say 'gg' at the end of the game, whether it is win or loss. Not all hope is lost

As for saying the winner saying 'gg' before the loser I must admit I do this, but not in offensive manner and only if there is like 5 VP's and I know 100% the game will time out then I will say it. Do people actually take offense to this? I notice the majority of time my opponents still say 'gg' in return so I have always assumed people accept it. Likewise, if my opponent is winning like in this situation and says 'gg' I return the gesture.

Uploaded upon request of stream viewers. This game highlights T1-T4 Shock doctrine usage (Counter Attacks), whilst mixing in some interesting M3 and sniper usage for early game play. Progresses to a KV1 and SU-85 tank line in the late game. Enjoyable game this one was.

gg wp Mordo47

Nope, but your t34 does

I really don't know if it still happens though, havn't seen it in a couple months.

Wow. Man that it is pure filth, havn't seen a rage quit like that in ages.

Ideally I always aim for that T70, but if I know that is not going to be possible due to my fuel situation I base my decision on the map. Open maps I just go for AT-nades/Zi3-S but on more closed maps I find myself going for AT-nades/mines.

It is really difficult though I find to stop a FHT when its used with a 4-5 gren spam on close quater maps that a cut-off is easy to access. Kharkov north for Soviets being one of the worst spawns to verse this strategy in my opinion.

Gren spam to FHT to T3 is the only thing I struggle with but going T1/guards/T3 play seems to be going quite well for me as of late as well to counter this. Need more testing though verse good players. I think my sniper usage forces my opponent to take risks and commit to engagements that they shouldn't. I do not upgrade DP guns til I see tanks, for the FHT I much rather have 2 extra mines on the map or float for AT nades.