Profile of Esxile

Avatar Area

Offline unknown
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1

General Information
Steam: 76561197961387624


Thread: Those stupid leiG spam24 Sep 2015, 10:40 AM Jump back to quoted post24 Sep 2015, 10:13 AMJadame! Combined arms? Like those which ISG spam ruins hardcore? I am so mad after playing against this pudding on certain maps, this BS is ridiculous. It neglects infantry play. It neglects team weapons. It single-handedly without any impact of the player counters everything non-fuel based. And if you are not playing against total noobs, their isgs would be protected by mines/rakkettens, so yeah, tanks are useless as well. Only counters remain is katy, scott and some off-maps (20 minute fuel units to counter 5 minute non fuel unit, such balance, much relic). Hail to comp-stop style camping and arty fest, micro and multitasking is for losers anyway. If i never ever see isgs in my games again it would be too soon. At the beginning, people wanted it because OKW had nothing to suppress and counter blob. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [USF] [All Modes] [Pack Howie cost]23 Sep 2015, 11:49 AM Jump back to quoted post23 Sep 2015, 10:42 AMJohnnyB Yesterday I ate a apple... omg arty kills static support units. Great news. Best way to counter ISG with the pak Howi is using the Vet1 phosphorus barrage + a quick attack ground where the ISG sit. Best way to counter the pak Howi with the ISG is letting him auto-fire from safe range. Imo it is far easier to counter the Pak with the ISG than the ISG with the Pak. Now the main difference between both unit is the synergy it has with its respective army, having the ISG sitting next to the PZHQ and being able to shot at anything in the map is a great synergy USF can't have. Something Axis fanboys don't want to acknowledge. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [OKW vs SOV] [1vs1] [SOV numerical advantage and doctorines]22 Sep 2015, 12:32 PM Jump back to quoted post22 Sep 2015, 12:20 PMWFA_DoomTornado "Those image serve as ingame examples of what numerical advantage means". I'm going to ignore further deliberated attempts at derailing the main points highlighted in the OP. I have read that similar OP response already in another similar whiner fake facts thread. Has a user be banned recently and try a sneaky comeback? The only think those pictures are showing is the OKW and Ost players made something wrong during those match. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Air Supremacy is just completely OP 22 Sep 2015, 07:43 AM OKW building are cheap, cheaper than many units in game that can be OS by other tools. So from this perspective I don't really understand the complaint: ML20 - B4 are OS by Stuka bomb Medium - Light vehicles costing more than OKW building OS by Jagtigers OKW players can easily build a new building in their base sector after the 1st one being destroyed, we are talking about 20/25 minutes before having the ability unlocked and probably more if the brit player upgrade his squads. Seeing how the bombing is expensive, the trade-off is clearly at OKW favor. In comparison, ML-20 or B4 can't be build in base sector if the 1st one is destroyed. Now if you really want to remove the capability of destroying OKW building, the price will need to be strongly decrease, which will make the ability more spammable, since a 180 ammo arty barrage already take out 60/70% of PanzerHQ building, we are talking about reducing its cost by half. Are you really sure you want that? In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Those stupid leiG spam21 Sep 2015, 19:49 PM At least we don't see anymore Brit Sim city, people have learn it quite fast. I haven't see any mortar/bofor/17pound since long in 4vs4. Relic wanted to do great improvement with their design idea with 2 different branches in 1 army but failed with the 1 unit counter 1 branch . In: COH2 Balance
Thread: [OKW] [All Modes] [2x ISG ending the game VS brits]21 Sep 2015, 13:38 PM The problem is mainly "How can you take it down when it is next to the PanzerHQ". Basically you can't approach it until you have medium tanks. This unit should keep it damage output but not the range. To balance it, I can see it having 60-70 range and a retreat button. As a comparison, it is like building ML20 or B4 arty in your base sector. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Suggestion- unique Flamethrower Rifleman unit21 Sep 2015, 13:26 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2015, 12:57 PMMr. Someguy I'm not sure if you realise it, but in your rush to declare Penals UP, you actually just supported normal Riflemen not having access to the Flamethower. So the best way to give flamer to normal rifleman is to make sure the unit is useless and nobody dare to build one. Interesting conception of Balance In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Suggestion- unique Flamethrower Rifleman unit21 Sep 2015, 12:36 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2015, 12:09 PMMr. Someguy Lol yes they are, people have been complaining about LMG Grens forever. Nop, read again. I'm not talking about the upgrade itself but the accessibility. Usually people are saying LMG is OP or BAR is OP, nerf it. Now we have : "Flamer shouldn't be an upgrade for rifle but a dedicated unit so we make sure there are less on the battlefield". Would you agree if I write "LMG shouldn't be an upgrade for Grenadier but a dedicated squad you buy from T2 or T3?". "Shreck shouldn't be an upgrade for Volks but a dedicated unit you buy from T1". We can discuss if a flamer upgrade is relevant on a mainline unit, same as LMG or shrek on a mainline unit. But inventing gimmick redesign because the doctrine works too well is rubbish. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: Suggestion- unique Flamethrower Rifleman unit21 Sep 2015, 12:07 PM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2015, 12:02 PMMr. Someguy Flamers on infantry isn't bad, Penals have had this since Day 1 and I haven't heard people complain Penals are OP for a very long time. It's New Rifle Vet + New Flames that made it over-perform. People were complaining of them before this patch. Are Allied players complaining because every Grenadier squad is upgraded with LMG or PZ with Shreck when you have the ammo for it? no. Same here, but since its Allied units, its obviously wrong to have it. In: COH2 Gameplay
Thread: How do I attack fortified axis positions as USF21 Sep 2015, 08:13 AM Jump back to quoted post21 Sep 2015, 03:32 AMmedhood Hello everyone, I'd like to know how to deal with mgs or flak buildings which are supported by enemy infantry, I have no trouble with dealing with these when theyre alone but sometimes I cant get my cutoff point or a vital point back because of 1-2 well placed mgs and infantry to stop my infantry from flanking etc. I have trouble with these positions and lost a few games because I couldnt push the enemy out of the positions, the last game I played I had to fight TWO king tigers in a 1 v 1 match I dont know how he got it I kept on decapping stuff all over the place and killed 2 panzer 4s as well so I guess I wasnt decapping enough ( I still won the game though XD ) I normally like to open up with 4 rifles and then tech up to leut and get an aa half track in my games then attempt to beat my enemy to tanks if Im behind on resources I like to purchase the capt instead My favorite commanders are airborne and rifle and I tend to have one of these selected in the games I play -4 RM into Lieutenant is probably 1 RM too much at start. I assume that if you decap you do it mainly with your RM which isn't a good strategy, it is better to keep your RM for the fighting and build a second squad of RE to harass his territories. -AAHT is good if you already have the fuel advantage. it is true that now it cost only 50 fuel now (60 before) but still it is a high risk / high reward unit mainly dedicated to support your RM to fight infantry, 1 pak or raken counter it. -To protect your cutoff or a choke point, you can build a Fighting position. Build it behind a shot blocker so it cannot be attack by a at gun or build some tank traps in the line of fire, they will act as shot blocker. -If there are a lot of houses, occupy them before your opponent. In: US Forces Strategies