multiple exaggerated drama posts into multiple threads
literally WTF.
Thread: New commanders incoming!!!15 Oct 2015, 11:17 AM
multiple exaggerated drama posts into multiple threads literally WTF. In: Lobby |
Thread: New commanders incoming!!!15 Oct 2015, 10:28 AM
In: Lobby |
Thread: New commanders incoming!!!15 Oct 2015, 09:49 AM
What is elite troops. In: Lobby |
Thread: New commanders incoming!!!15 Oct 2015, 08:47 AM
Bcz they are rangers. Rangers in first coh had thompsons and zooks. Rangers in ardennes assault had 5 thompsons and 2 zooks which can be holstered like spio sweeper. Those rangers either be 3 thompsons 2 rifles with possibility to pick zooks from rack if relic actually tried to balance them, or 5 thompsons holstered zooks lol balance sqaud with sprint and commandos level dps. Probably last one, but you never know. In: Lobby |
Thread: New commanders incoming!!!15 Oct 2015, 07:59 AM
I would stop making any whine posts right now. If you followed my posts you will see it is not whine. We don't know what will be the cost for Rangers or equipment. true; but they should have thompsons and zookas, and we know stats of those weapons. And in worst case scenario they should have at least 3 thompsons. This is enough to beat pgrens 1 on 1. But you don't need this doctrine for such thing. Nade smoke/Sherman smoke and attack ground with Cpt. you need at least 3 rifles supporting cpt to excecute that. 1 smoke to approach, second smoke to cover FlakHq, third and following smokes to keep it smoked. Pershing? Again, no idea about stats but around 300 armor is not threat to Axis. Idk, its still best tank you can get with ami. In: Lobby |
Thread: New commanders incoming!!!15 Oct 2015, 07:31 AM
You do realize that commander have unparalleled combination of useful abilities which would make even rifle co jealous, right? You do realize that rangers in worst case scenario with 3 thompsons and 2 zooks which cant be holstered still beat pudding out of pgrens without shrecks, sturms, and probably lot of other infantry, as well as helping aginst vehicles and tanks, right? You do realize that this smoke on OKW flak hq+attack ground with zooks on rangers would be easiest counter to OKW flak HQ ever, right? And you know, pershing. This commander even after unavoidable nerfs would be very good. In: Lobby |
Thread: New commanders incoming!!!15 Oct 2015, 06:49 AM
Nah, thats too much. Free, but with really long cooldown. Smth like 3 minutes. In: Lobby |
Thread: New commanders incoming!!!15 Oct 2015, 06:30 AM
im just hoping rangers can have the ability to purchase panzershrecks like they did in AA that way they have a fighting chance when dealing with axis armor and it makes the axis player a bit more cautious when committing armor into an area lol. Maybe they should also call-in atomic bomb? In: Lobby |
Thread: Holding Lienne Forest as USF (4v4)15 Oct 2015, 02:00 AM
2 one, 2 another. In case of steppes its fuel and fuel, in case of lorch its ammo and ammo. There always a way to punish triple siding via exploiting open flanks and uncovered retreat paths. |
Thread: Holding Lienne Forest as USF (4v4)15 Oct 2015, 01:30 AM
I have observed most play on Lienne to be heavily based around city and mid, and I still think that is the way to go. And its horrific mistake to do. Every 4v4 map should be played 2 one side 2 another. If you go triple city on lienne, those double guys from opposite team who went forest will wreck your forest player, then flank you with their entire force, take your fuel, cut off your whole city side, camp buildings on city cut-off point and probably kill half of your armies on retreat as well as deny any reinforcement to your force left in a city. And you would be extremely lucky if they have no hmgs to put in the buildings. All of this for exchange of only possibility pushing 2 city-side players to their own cutoff with marginal bleed. Well, gl winning game from there on. |