Profile of The Yankee Division

Avatar Area

Offline Unknown SteamID unknown
Posts: 5

General Information


Thread: Soviet TM 35 Mine30 Apr 2014, 12:58 PM Jump back to quoted post30 Apr 2014, 11:06 AMKatitof Well, cataclaw lost M3, flame engies and shock squad to a single mine field. All mines are really potent. Try sometimes placing a teller or minefield instead of getting LMG, grens don't really need these LMGs to beat cons. S-mine fields come with obvious signs, cost twice as much and gives its victims the chance to halt if they stumble upon it. If a S-mine field wipes a squad it is usually due to incompetence on the Soviet side unless it is placed in a retreat path. Soviet mines are stealthy sons of guns that regularly wipe entire squads that step on them. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Who thinks troop training is fair?30 Apr 2014, 10:39 AM I think it needs a CP change to 6 CP. A vet 3 mortar or a vet 2 sniper is pure murder against soviet tier 2 in the early-mid game. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Soviet TM 35 Mine30 Apr 2014, 10:26 AM Jump back to quoted post30 Apr 2014, 01:30 AMbraciszek What would be the point of mines if they weren't a threat? If mines didnt kill my squads, i wouldn't upgrade pios to get a minesweeper. Nobody is suggesting not making them a threat. People are simply upset that 240 or 320 manpower gets lost to a mine. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: ISU-15229 Apr 2014, 18:33 PM Jump back to quoted post26 Apr 2014, 09:19 AMKyleAkira Isu 152 should have a switch between HE rounds and High penetration rounds. And a timer for changing it. It can't be an ANTI ALL unit. The 152mm high-explosive shells were so powerful that many ISU-152 only used high-explosive rounds because they were they powerful enough to take out tanks. Armor piercing rounds for the ISU-152 were unnecessary. In: COH2 Balance
Thread: Performance Gap Between Cons and Grens too large Late Game?28 Apr 2014, 13:54 PM From a balance point of view a non-doctrinal weapon upgrade would be unnecesary since the red army already has plenty of cost effective means to deal with hostile infantry late in the game. We must also remember what's unseen, upgrading grenadiers with better firepower means less mines, bunkers and panzerschrecks built. The red army can give penal battalions flamethrowers to beat panzergrenadiers and engineers can put two mines for 60 munitions. The precision strike for red army mortars is good against 4 man squads. Both sides can turn the tide of an engagement by spending munitions points so I don't see any balance issues with grenadiers having firepower upgrades. In: COH2 Balance