Login

russian armor

quick question about flamers

14 Oct 2013, 03:59 AM
#1
avatar of Kalismist

Posts: 46

Do flames do less damage to units in negative cover and damp areas as it did in vcoh?
14 Oct 2013, 06:22 AM
#2
avatar of sir muffin

Posts: 531

don't think so, but they do the same damage to retreating soldiers as they do normally

i don't know why they don't do less damage to negative cover, makes sense.
14 Oct 2013, 08:54 AM
#3
avatar of Nullist

Posts: 2425

Permanently Banned
Same dmg no matter what they are doing or where they are hiding. Always the same.

But vs units in vehicles makes me wonder. Since the models are so bunched together that some arent even shown on the vehicle, such as in M3. That one Im not sure about.
14 Oct 2013, 20:21 PM
#4
avatar of Twister
Honorary Member Badge
Patrion 39

Posts: 2072 | Subs: 1

Flamethrowers always do the same damage, except for units in red cover (0.5*dmg) or in water (0.5 * penetration, 0.2 * accuracy, 0.5 * dmg).

They also do way less damage to units in vehicles (0.1 * dmg).
14 Oct 2013, 20:26 PM
#5
avatar of Nullist

Posts: 2425

Permanently Banned
jump backJump back to quoted post14 Oct 2013, 20:21 PMTwister
Flamethrowers always do the same damage, except for units in red cover (0.5*dmg) or in water (0.5 * penetration, 0.2 * accuracy, 0.5 * dmg).

They also do way less damage to units in vehicles (0.1 * dmg).


Thanks!
15 Oct 2013, 03:09 AM
#6
avatar of Kalismist

Posts: 46

thank you so much!

Nullist please don't answer topics on which you just assume or guess the answer. Thank you.
15 Oct 2013, 04:38 AM
#7
avatar of Appleseed

Posts: 622

thank you so much!

Nullist please don't answer topics on which you just assume or guess the answer. Thank you.


don't pick on Nullist he is being social-able at current state and not try to start wars every post, it is a good sign and don't give him another chance to start a war
15 Oct 2013, 06:56 AM
#8
avatar of computerheat
Honorary Member Badge
Benefactor 117

Posts: 2838 | Subs: 3

Aren't flamethrowers also an area-of-effect weapon? Since units in cover tend to clump together, it makes flamers more effective as there are more targets in the AoE.
15 Oct 2013, 09:47 AM
#9
avatar of Twister
Honorary Member Badge
Patrion 39

Posts: 2072 | Subs: 1

Aren't flamethrowers also an area-of-effect weapon? Since units in cover tend to clump together, it makes flamers more effective as there are more targets in the AoE.


You're right, that's why they do full damage to units on retreat as well. They reduced their damage to units in vehicles by 90% probably because these units get so clumped up that they would get insta-roasted otherwise.

If you want to keep your units in red cover against flamers, you should watch out for the other squad members of the flamer squad. If you're fighting a Penal squad for example, they could gain more dps on their rifles than they would lose on their flamethrower because of negative cover.
0 user is browsing this thread:

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

967 users are online: 967 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49082
Welcome our newest member, 23winlocker
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM