Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Kind of what I was thinking, essentially use the US Paratroopers as an example, Airborne Guards start off with SVTs and can upgrade to a PPSH SMG package or two DP LMGs.
Posts: 657
Is that with or without the DP upgrade?
Only there is little reason for a long range unit, since Guards with PTRS are already superior to LMG Paras (at least according to Bizrok)
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
Is that with or without the DP upgrade?
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
Only there is little reason for a long range unit, since Guards with PTRS are already superior to LMG Paras (at least according to Bizrok)
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
You and I both know those tests are bonkers. Guards have about 18 far DPS (24 at vet 3) while LMG Paras have 26,5 far DPS (36 at vet 3) while having similar RA. Using Hit The Dirt only in a vacuum is unfair because the ability in a real match comes with several risks.
Posts: 3166 | Subs: 6
And what exactly would be the estimate performance of this unit? Ober level? Else normal Guard would probably be a better choice since the come earlier, have a snare and AT capabilities.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
I thought you said units in the same faction shouldn't compete with one another?
Posts: 657
I am simply point out an overlap between the suggested soviet airborne with 3 DPs and the regular Guards mentioning that tests conducted by Bizrock as an indication. If you do not trust the result I suggest you repeat them...
Hit the dirt should be taken into account since it used regularly and increases the DPS of the unit.
And what exactly would be the estimate performance of this unit? Ober level? Else normal Guard would probably be a better choice since the come earlier, have a snare and AT capabilities.
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
2 DPs is enough really.
Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1
two DP-27s will really be enough, given that they are most likely to be a buff, and they need a buff - this is the worst LMG in the game.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Still sad the USF Command that won is just basically going to be a mixed breed of Armor and HC.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Unfortunately, because all these new commanders are ersatz new commanders. The time that was spent from the announcement of new commanders (more than eight months have passed, the British faction was made in a year), it was possible to make really new unique abilities and units: to make real Soviet Paratroopers and Paratrooper tank (T-38, T-40) , make Sherman Jumbo or Super Pershing for USA, etc. Well, this is at least some kind of new content.
Posts: 657
Soviet Paratroopers or British Lend Lease sound more exciting than stuff like.
Armor but with Rangers/Calliope.
Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1
Unless there is still some unused assets for Ardennes Assault, I don’t think much else could have been added for Americans. Maybe some new arty or air strikes abilities.
Posts: 657
I just think the other concept could have been more creative and exciting.
Maybe even have Paratroopers in some other form.
Posts: 416 | Subs: 1
You and I both know those tests are bonkers.
Posts: 1484
 | Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 563
Posts: 857 | Subs: 2
With usf we really should look for things the ardennes assault has. Like the hunker down ability, cache supply points, man the defenses and (i have repeated this one too much like a parrot) rifle satchel charges.
 |
|
|
70 | ||
 |
|
|
30 | ||
 |
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 | ||
 |
|
|
48 | ||
|
|
|
|
13 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
