I have a intel core i7 3570k, 16 gb ram, nvidia GeForce Getz 670, and I can't play at full settings. Is this possible ? The game was miserable programmed. What for a system we need for play it at high details ??
Noun are they coming any updates in the future ??
Thx have a nice day, I still love this game
Sorry for my English
game performance Really bad
15 Sep 2013, 10:34 AM
#1
5 
Posts: 67
15 Sep 2013, 10:38 AM
#2
Posts: 249
That's weird indeed. I have the same video card, less ram and shittier CPU (AMD) and I can play the game all maxed out.
15 Sep 2013, 10:57 AM
#3
5 Posts: 67
I have 4 Friends they have the Same Computer like me, and they have the Same Problem. Er must put antialiasing off, then it is ok but in a 4vs4 game it laggs when many units are in the fight. And all test from pc games, computerbild, or other game magazine says the same. A Titan has on Full Settings max. 45 fps
Look at this http://m.techspot.com/review/689-company-of-heroes-2-performance/page3.html
Sorry for my English
Look at this http://m.techspot.com/review/689-company-of-heroes-2-performance/page3.html
Sorry for my English
15 Sep 2013, 11:20 AM
#4
5 Posts: 67
Oh sorry the 45 fps with the titan are at low settings!!! It may not be possible
17 Sep 2013, 05:51 AM
#5
Posts: 622
weird i have a i7 3770k 16g 660ti i run everything on max except antialiasing on med. it was completely fine no lag
17 Sep 2013, 07:36 AM
#6
Posts: 25
1. set AA to low, so it uses FXAA. If you set it higher, your rig is biting more than it can chew.
2. Do not use the ingame benchmark as reference, because it has much more field depth than you are used to play when you use the view-from-above.
3. Try playing in windowed mode:
1) Exit the game if you currently have it open
2) In your Steam Library, right click on the game
3) Click on "Properties"
4) Click on "Set Launch Options" at the bottom
5) copy and paste the following into the text area: -window -lockmouse
(dash, and the word "window", space, dash and the word "lockmouse")
now check if you are experiencing any improvement.
3. If it's still not enough, disabling replay recording has proved to give you a 10-20 fps boost. Follow this guide for reference http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=156776308
Hope it will be useful!
2. Do not use the ingame benchmark as reference, because it has much more field depth than you are used to play when you use the view-from-above.
3. Try playing in windowed mode:
1) Exit the game if you currently have it open
2) In your Steam Library, right click on the game
3) Click on "Properties"
4) Click on "Set Launch Options" at the bottom
5) copy and paste the following into the text area: -window -lockmouse
(dash, and the word "window", space, dash and the word "lockmouse")
now check if you are experiencing any improvement.
3. If it's still not enough, disabling replay recording has proved to give you a 10-20 fps boost. Follow this guide for reference http://steamcommunity.com/sharedfiles/filedetails/?id=156776308
Hope it will be useful!
 | Playercard of walkingbass | |||||||||||||||||||
|
17 Sep 2013, 09:35 AM
#7
Posts: 172
How can disabling replay recording give so much? It's just saving all the commands as text or some related form. No graphics or anything.
17 Sep 2013, 09:49 AM
#8
Posts: 25
How can disabling replay recording give so much? It's just saving all the commands as text or some related form. No graphics or anything.
same question I asked myself before tryin'. Replay Recording is simply not as performing as in CoH1, but I couldn't say why and how! no official replies from relic about that...
In low-end rigs like mine disabling replay recording results in a boost in performance:
Intel® Core™ i5 3210M Processor
Intel Integrated Graphics HD 4000
8 GB RAM
Keeping AA low, textures high, physics medium and tweaking inside the settings in order to keep shadows but disabling Ambient occlusion file I can run 1vs1 multiplayer matches at avg 35 fps.
Which is more than enough to enjoy the game
| Playercard of walkingbass | |||||||||||||||||||
|
17 Sep 2013, 10:15 AM
#9
Posts: 172
Btw, Imback88 the OP, I have a very similar rig. I guess we have the same processor (as 3570K is an i5 not i7) and the same amount of memory, but I have a Radeon HD 6950 with 2 GB memory. This set lets me play the game with all things maxed out, even AA. I have no performance issues even in 4v4 games. During the beta, when I still had my 5 years old processor/mobo and 6 gigs of memory, I had to play with mixed medium/low graphics.
edit.
Curiously enough, the performance test gives absolutely horrendous results, but they don't seem to appear in game. The smoke from fires seem to be the biggest culprit for slowdowns.
edit.
Curiously enough, the performance test gives absolutely horrendous results, but they don't seem to appear in game. The smoke from fires seem to be the biggest culprit for slowdowns.
17 Sep 2013, 14:35 PM
#10
Posts: 255
1st of all get the latest drivers. Try beta drivers for videocard.
.... and still though the performance of the game is dissaster.
Has anyone yet got the game running @ 60-100FPS?
.... and still though the performance of the game is dissaster.
Has anyone yet got the game running @ 60-100FPS?
17 Sep 2013, 21:31 PM
#11
Posts: 100 | Subs: 2
Lots of games can't be run on max settings when they are released; Crysis, Max Payne 3 and CoH1 comes to mind.
This doesn't mean that the game isn't optimized or performance is poor.
It's done so that the game still looks awesome in 3-4-5 years from now.
This doesn't mean that the game isn't optimized or performance is poor.
It's done so that the game still looks awesome in 3-4-5 years from now.
31 Mar 2014, 21:16 PM
#12
Posts: 680
I got my replays disabled so the game runs better(hope it does). But I would like to be able to download and watch others replays, possible?
31 Mar 2014, 23:25 PM
#13
Posts: 589
for one, the game needs SLI and crossfire support .. this is 2014 for petes sake!
1 Apr 2014, 10:32 AM
#14
Posts: 1355
for one, the game needs SLI and crossfire support .. this is 2014 for petes sake!
+1.000.000
From your mouth to the devs ears!!!
1 Apr 2014, 11:23 AM
#15
1 
Posts: 172
Can anyone actually have the games AA set to anything above low without major FPS loss?
I have an i5 3570K, 8gb Ram, GTX670 2gb and I can run everything on high apart from image quality on "high" and AA set to low.
It runs between 40 and 60 FPS but if I set AA to medium it drops drastically.
Just interested to see if anyone can get better performance with a simalar rig.
I have an i5 3570K, 8gb Ram, GTX670 2gb and I can run everything on high apart from image quality on "high" and AA set to low.
It runs between 40 and 60 FPS but if I set AA to medium it drops drastically.
Just interested to see if anyone can get better performance with a simalar rig.
If I had to take hell, I would use the Australians to take it and the New Zealanders to hold it
- Erwin Rommel
- Erwin Rommel
1 Apr 2014, 12:19 PM
#16
5 Posts: 67
No I have the same problem..... Similar specification...
1 Apr 2014, 13:25 PM
#17
Posts: 140
Can anyone actually have the games AA set to anything above low without major FPS loss?
I have an i5 3570K, 8gb Ram, GTX670 2gb and I can run everything on high apart from image quality on "high" and AA set to low.
It runs between 40 and 60 FPS but if I set AA to medium it drops drastically.
Just interested to see if anyone can get better performance with a simalar rig.
As far as I know, the medium and high AA settings actually renders the game at a higher resolution (1.5x or 2.0x) and then scales the game down to your screen.
This is extremely demanding, and I would not think anyone would get good performance using these AA settings unless they have a radeon 290, gtx 780 or higher.
Basically, if you want AA, stick to the other settings or the AA settings in the Windows control panel for ATI/Nvidia.
1 Apr 2014, 14:35 PM
#18
1 
Posts: 2075 | Subs: 2
AA to low and Vsync off. Max out the rest, should be fine.
I used to run this exact setting with a 6970 which is slower than your 670 by a good margin. If not there's a bigger issue in your system.
I used to run this exact setting with a 6970 which is slower than your 670 by a good margin. If not there's a bigger issue in your system.
1 Apr 2014, 19:23 PM
#19
10 Posts: 871
I run the game at 1920 x 1200. With a 2600k @ 4.7Ghz, 8GB of ram and a 6970 overclocked to 900 / 1400 if my memory is right (previous card) with the following settings:
Gameplay Resolution: 100%
Image Quality: Higher
Anti Aliasing: Low
V-sync: Off
Texture Detail: High or Higher
Snow Detail: Low
Physics: Low
I was getting normal minimums of 50 fps (sometimes dropping to 30/40 during blizzards and when lots of stuff was going on), maximums of 80 - 90 and averages of around 60 - 70. I used afterburner to log the fps and just looked at the results, didnt work them out or anything. The ingame benchark used to record really crap fps but the game played fine. I have since moved to a 290x and even at stock gives me silly fps (normally over 100 in 2v2 with most settings at max). I will try to record my fps somewhen soon to see what the average is. It might be worth downloading afterburner and using it to log frame rates then dump them into excel to see what your average actually is.
Gameplay Resolution: 100%
Image Quality: Higher
Anti Aliasing: Low
V-sync: Off
Texture Detail: High or Higher
Snow Detail: Low
Physics: Low
I was getting normal minimums of 50 fps (sometimes dropping to 30/40 during blizzards and when lots of stuff was going on), maximums of 80 - 90 and averages of around 60 - 70. I used afterburner to log the fps and just looked at the results, didnt work them out or anything. The ingame benchark used to record really crap fps but the game played fine. I have since moved to a 290x and even at stock gives me silly fps (normally over 100 in 2v2 with most settings at max). I will try to record my fps somewhen soon to see what the average is. It might be worth downloading afterburner and using it to log frame rates then dump them into excel to see what your average actually is.
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
49 | ||
 |
|
|
13 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
0 | ||
|
|
|
|
17 | ||
|
|
|
|
16 | ||
|
|
|
|
6 | ||
 |
|
|
4 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.34957.860+14
- 3.589215.733+4
- 4.1101614.642+2
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.271108.715+22
- 8.721440.621+3
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1231
Board Info
974 users are online:
974 guests
1 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
38 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49081
Welcome our newest member, kavyashide
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, kavyashide
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM