Double USA = Rubbish
Posts: 367
I play US and got a US teammate 3 games in a row while my opponents are wehr + OKW all the time. I definitely lost those game no doubt. Double USA is the worst choice.
Rubbish matchmaking
Posts: 44
Posts: 2742
Keep in mind most of my analysis these days is from Obs mode/replays and watching streams. I hardly have the time/energy/focus for competitive matches. But that said, when USF players are coordinating their tech picks and commanders they typically show a much stronger performance. Since USF commander and tech choices limit/focus their options more than any other faction, good axis teams can often easily exploit this.
Watching players go double Airborne/LT can be frustrating sometimes.
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
You know I see that USF can be at a disadvantage against mixed axis. Sturms and Volks are much better at covering MGs and Mortars than Pios and Grens in those crucial early stages of the game. However, I think that double USF is made or broken by tech and commander coordination more than any other faction combination.
Keep in mind most of my analysis these days is from Obs mode/replays and watching streams. I hardly have the time/energy/focus for competitive matches. But that said, when USF players are coordinating their tech picks and commanders they typically show a much stronger performance.
Watching players go double Airborne/LT can be frustrating sometimes.
+1
Since you can only really build rifles for tech you get into a lot of trouble if you run headfirst into HMGs and support teams. It's partially why I think 2v2 currently favors UKF + Sov as a team since they both can bring support teams to the table from minute 1. USF just doesn't synergize as well as mixed axis or UKF + Sov, so you do need to play better or coordinate more with your teammate.
Posts: 515
Posts: 493
Posts: 32
But yeah, double USF is kinda hardcore mod.
Posts: 117
I've played double USA and beat many good teams ... if you're having issues, it's definitely a L2P issue... sorry to say... if you want actual tips I can give them, but if you're here to complain, then I'm here to tell you you're wrong.
Replay plz
This whole thread has no proof, just random players telling him to get better
Posts: 367
Replay plz
This whole thread has no proof, just random players telling him to get better
Your text..
I have reached my goal and stop playing US
Posts: 310
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Posts: 515
Replay plz
This whole thread has no proof, just random players telling him to get better
Not that you can even view the replay anymore after the patch.
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
Not that you can even view the replay anymore after the patch.
Yeah...so why post the replay if it can´t be watched anyways. A unwatchable replay is definitly going to help OP a lot. Thanks for your effort.
10/10
Posts: 515
Yeah...so why post the replay if it can´t be watched anyways. A unwatchable replay is definitly going to help OP a lot. Thanks for your effort.
10/10
y so salty
Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1
If I see sub 50 IQ posts, I just have to reply.
Posts: 117
WAT. Sounds like a L2P issue, USF is very strong right now, with a new and improved late game too. If you're losing, its not because your faction is trash.
Gotta disagree with this one here.
Soviets are the best right now for 2v2, ever since Firefly nerf it's better to have jacksons behind t-43's.
Or double soviets.
Posts: 310
Gotta disagree with this one here.
Soviets are the best right now for 2v2, ever since Firefly nerf it's better to have jacksons behind t-43's.
Or double soviets.
USF is good too in 2v2, it just depends on skill. I play with my friends and we are always go as USF/UKF or USF/USSR. We obviously don't win every game, but we try our best. It also depends on how much you communicate with your teammate.
Posts: 515
Y not?
If I see sub 50 IQ posts, I just have to reply.
I think you have 50 IQ, and completely missed the point of my previous post. The guy whom I quoted said "Replay plz
This whole thread has no proof"
So my reply was exactly what he wanted - a replay to prove that my previous statement, where I said 2x USF is fine because I have beat good teams in the past, and that not playing them well is a L2P issue.
The point was to never provide a replay to show any strategy or tactics - OP never asked for that, he merely complained how trash USF is. The guy who quoted me didn't ask for that either, he just wanted proof that I've beat good teams - which I quickly and gladly gave him.
You should get for facts straight before you get really mad for no reason and try to insult people.
Posts: 117
USF is good too in 2v2, it just depends on skill. I play with my friends and we are always go as USF/UKF or USF/USSR. We obviously don't win every game, but we try our best. It also depends on how much you communicate with your teammate.
I see alot of losses (manpower) from double USF, it feeds too much vet lol
Posts: 310
I see alot of losses (manpower) from double USF, it feeds too much vet lol
Imagine those manpower losses x4 when you play with 4 USF in 4v4 maps xD
Livestreams
11 | |||||
10 | |||||
0 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.655231.739+15
- 2.842223.791+5
- 3.35157.860+16
- 4.599234.719+7
- 5.934410.695-1
- 6.278108.720+29
- 7.307114.729+3
- 8.645.928+5
- 9.10629.785+7
- 10.527.881+18
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
15 posts in the last week
27 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, seoworld4
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM