Posts: 3053
 | Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 393
Posts: 2184 | Subs: 2
Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1
Posts: 4183 | Subs: 4
Posts: 99
Posts: 1216
Posts: 3053
That'll boost the power of mediums even farther. Not something needed at all for 1v1. Teamgames is another story, but a lot of times it's a map issue or a team synergy issue.
Having to wait another 230 fuel to call in a single vehicle again is already a hefty price. Any player that just floats that amount in case their Tiger is lost, is just giving their opponent less targets to shoot.
And even if you do lose a Tiger and immediately call in another one, you've got to retreat and consolidate to prevent further losses of units in exchange for territory, and it also comes with zero veterancy. I don't see why people call it "easy" to replace; even in my 2x income mod matches you don't just call them in one after the other. BTW they cost buttload of manpower as well.
no
| Playercard of LoopDloop | |||||||||||||||||||
|
Posts: 71
Posts: 309 | Subs: 1
Not a good idea, Tiger and IS-2 don't make sense right now (useless, easy to destroy), only King Tiger and Pershing are really good and Pershing is very easy to destroy, only King Tiger is really too strong
Posts: 612 | Subs: 1
Posts: 1216
The thing is, in teamgames that last a really long time (like 50+ minutes) unless you play like a true soviet commander with your tanks you shouldn't lose that many when you have a heavy because keeping one heavy alive usually means you aren't "bleeding" from losing a medium here, a medium there. This applies to both axis and allies. They are much easier to replace in those situations than they are to take out.
Posts: 3602 | Subs: 1
Posts: 67
Posts: 1585 | Subs: 1
 |
|
|
49 | ||
|
|
|
|
7 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
 |
|
|
167 | ||
|
|
|
|
23 | ||
 |
|
|
21 | ||
 |
|
|
6 | ||
|
|
|
|
5 | ||
|
|
|
|
4 |
Relic Entertainment
cblanco ★ 
보드카 중대 
VonManteuffel 
Heartless Jäger 
