ahm....yeah...comet and cromwell are bad and overpriced.
i don´t know which version do u play...but comet is by far the better allrounder tank...it wipes squads like hell..is really fast, bombs, and is easy spamable...
the panther is only good vs tanks...but have its weakness on reload and accuracy. in a static fight..panther wins...but...common..who is dumb enough to stay and let them fight....a comet runs around and wipe really easy sqauds and gets vet in no time.
panther need much micro and cant deal with infantery...
crommwell to expansive?? wtf?? what did u drunk? its to cheap for its perofmanche....it is much better than pz4.
oh...a static emplacment which doesnt need commander is counterable by a 720MP/285fuel commander 14CP unit...u are so lol my friend.
and your mg is bad?? to bad its one of the best in houses...it wins every fight vs axis mgs.
and sappers need accuraccy? shure? last time i used them the do very well for their price. reminds: sturm pios cost 300mp...and sappers are not very weaker as them
First off let me say thank you for taking the time to spell check and actually give me a really well thought out 'constructive argument'.
The comet is in fact a pretty alright all around tank however it has its major downsides especially since you are locked into the tech. Not only do brits lack a decent heavy tank but they also lack a decent non-doctrinal tanks outside of the Croc. This means that your late armor relies on either the Churchill, the comet, or firefly to be your tools to counter late game axis armor. In 2v2s+ the matchup generally goes like this: 2 comets to 2 panthers, while the pricing for each unit is the same, the potency and chance to counter leaves the axis at a vastly superior match up with a 75%+ win chance due to the panther’s main gun pen and its frontal armor. The comets gun, while having a fast reload only has a chance to pen the front end of a panther 50% of the time it fires, that's and RNG nightmare when your gun now has 5 less range than the opposing sides equally* priced tank right?
The Cromwell is expensive in relation to the tech price incorporated into the brits. As brits, it’s almost a necessity to grab an AEC in match as your mid game is almost non-existent. to rely on the piat is can be risk as the potency of axis Volk STG blobs and sturmpios means that the loss of a weapon can lead a lot of loss DPS. As such you are already down 30 fuel for the second AEC tech cost, plus the 60 needed for the AEC so you might as well skip the Cromwell all together. Along with that comes the fact that the Cromwell itself is now slower to react, had it top speed reduced, has a similar pen to the P4, with lower moving accuracy, and has lower secondary infantry damage due to no pintail MG. It’s not worth the price and simply doesn't fit into the pacing of the game. Sure, it’s an okay unit on its own but it comes too late to be of use.
The emplacement is terrible while its non-doctrinal, you have to look at the features of the doctrinal equivalent. The pak43 can shoot through walls, only cost 600mp, and requires a fuel investment.
The counter to a big AT gun is a tank that shoots through shot blockers (much like the pak 43) at +5 range than the 17pdr and involves no counter play in the slightest. Not to mention the Jagdtiger has an HE shell with 128 range but that's a different subject. Regardless the range should either come down on the jag by 5 or 17pdr should be treated as a similar non-doctrinal unit with similar abilities but higher cost to offset.
The sappers themselves as I suggested had two options to tweak the unit. If you read what I had said you would have noticed I recommended slight number tweaks, not a major jump or change so calm down.
Edit: oh yea the vickers. If you would have read what I said, you would have seen that I called it "a good MG" but stated that its damage per round prevents it from filling the suppression role it's intended to fill.