Login

russian armor

Why is the Pershing so cheap?

  • This thread is locked
19 Feb 2017, 13:44 PM
#1
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

Stats-wise this seems totally unfair:
Pershing
800HP
300/110 Armor
16-24 DPS F/N
450 MP 150 Fuel

Command Panther
800 HP
320/110 Armor
16-21 DPS F/N
560 MP 225 Fuel

Comet
800HP
290/130 Armor
16-25 DPS F/N
500 MP 185 Fuel

Please educate me on why the Pershing only costs 150 Fuel while beating a Command Panther in performance despite the Panther costing 225 Fuel to an already fuel strapped OKW faction? Even the Comet which by many is considered OP doesn´t outperform the Pershing while being more expensive.
19 Feb 2017, 14:03 PM
#2
avatar of 0ld_Shatterhand
Donator 22

Posts: 194

The pershing costs 230 fuel and not 150.
19 Feb 2017, 14:48 PM
#3
avatar of sinthe

Posts: 414

The pershing costs 230 fuel and not 150.


Educated
19 Feb 2017, 15:09 PM
#4
avatar of A table

Posts: 249

> pershing costs 230 fuel
19 Feb 2017, 15:20 PM
#5
avatar of Spanky
Senior Strategist Badge

Posts: 1820 | Subs: 2

600 mp aswell.
19 Feb 2017, 15:28 PM
#6
avatar of Outsider_Sidaroth

Posts: 1323 | Subs: 1

I wish the Pershing was that cheap, then I might actually think is useful for something else than pissing off Axis players.
19 Feb 2017, 15:51 PM
#7
avatar of Vipper

Posts: 13496 | Subs: 1

OP is using the cost from stat coh2 and maybe that is the actual price of the unit (did not open to check)

The call in price is different thou.
19 Feb 2017, 15:58 PM
#8
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7

Stats-wise this seems totally unfair:
Pershing
800HP
300/110 Armor
16-24 DPS F/N
450 MP 150 Fuel


19 Feb 2017, 16:20 PM
#9
avatar of LimaOscarMike

Posts: 440

now it clearly that he didn't even touch all features he got at all

after all people try to improve him
19 Feb 2017, 16:20 PM
#10
avatar of scratchedpaintjob
Donator 11

Posts: 1021 | Subs: 1




read the post before yours again and you will understand why your post is not your best...

at OP:
coh2stats is outdated for some stuff, unfortunately i haven't found a website with updated stats

19 Feb 2017, 16:28 PM
#11
avatar of __deleted__

Posts: 4314 | Subs: 7


read the post before yours again and you will understand why your post is not your best...

at OP:
coh2stats is outdated for some stuff, unfortunately i haven't found a website with updated stats


Then why is he creating a balance topic about unit he have no clue about - if you ever was using pershing, you will know he cost 230 fuel
19 Feb 2017, 16:40 PM
#12
avatar of ZombiFrancis

Posts: 2742


Then why is he creating a balance topic about unit he have no clue about - if you ever was using pershing, you will know he cost 230 fuel


Hey many people still may not have the Pershing commander to know its cost first hand.
19 Feb 2017, 16:41 PM
#13
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

I don´t play USF that´s why I didnt know Pershing fuel price is 230 despite being listed at 150 fuel at stat.coh2.hu.

I also never mentioned Pershing in my previous posts. What are you even talking about?

Please show me where I mentioned Pershing in this forum before.

Just delete this thread since obviously I was wrong.

19 Feb 2017, 16:57 PM
#14
avatar of Obersoldat

Posts: 393

Probs for OP for not having a P2W doc :sibHyena:
19 Feb 2017, 17:56 PM
#15
avatar of DonnieChan

Posts: 2272 | Subs: 1

Is there any Unit there isn't an "OP"- thread about in the balance forum?
19 Feb 2017, 17:58 PM
#16
avatar of blvckdream

Posts: 2458 | Subs: 1

Is there any Unit there isn't an "OP"- thread about in the balance forum?


At the given price it isn´t op. Never said that.
19 Feb 2017, 18:16 PM
#17
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

Is there any Unit there isn't an "OP"- thread about in the balance forum?

M-42 :foreveralone:
19 Feb 2017, 18:28 PM
#18
avatar of ferwiner
Donator 11

Posts: 2885

The main problem of ballance forums is in the people who never play the faction in question but argue about it. In my experience, in 99% of cases, if someone says that the faction he doesn't play is OP, its a hardcore l2p issue.
19 Feb 2017, 18:49 PM
#19
avatar of ElSlayer

Posts: 1605 | Subs: 1

The main problem of ballance forums is in the people who never play the faction in question but argue about it. In my experience, in 99% of cases, if someone says that the faction he doesn't play is OP, its a hardcore l2p issue.

I'd add that in many cases the issue is in the map balance, not the faction balance.
19 Feb 2017, 19:10 PM
#20
avatar of Tobis
Senior Strategist Badge
Donator 11

Posts: 2307 | Subs: 4

The problem with the pershing is that it's incredibly easy for USF to skip t4 and stay on t3 with the stuart, and get a pershing very soon after the axis factions can get their first medium tank which will be completely outclassed.

Hopefully the light vehicle changes will make this more difficult.
1 user is browsing this thread: 1 guest

Ladders Top 10

  • #
    Steam Alias
    W
    L
    %
    Streak
Data provided by Relic Relic Entertainment

Replay highlight

VS
  • U.S. Forces flag cblanco ★
  • The British Forces flag 보드카 중대
  • Oberkommando West flag VonManteuffel
  • Ostheer flag Heartless Jäger
uploaded by XXxxHeartlessxxXX

Board Info

572 users are online: 572 guests
0 post in the last 24h
5 posts in the last week
17 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49668
Welcome our newest member, Mckifcdvllip
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM