Molotovs suck
Posts: 174
but they are not really any cheaper than regular grenades since it takes at least 2 to kill a garrisoned HMG.
and with the new patch, the stupid wind-up required, they will be pretty much unusable.
im actually in a game right now, and Alt+tabbed to wait for it to actually do any damage.
Posts: 658
but they are not really any cheaper than regular grenades since it takes at least 2 to kill a garrisoned HMG.
And you need more than just one regular grenade to clear buildings
Posts: 2693 | Subs: 1
Posts: 640 | Subs: 1
Posts: 2885
Posts: 393
Compared to Volks flame nade animation time I weep when ever I try to throw a molotov.
Molotovs are 50% cheaper to trow and OKW gets side teching in new patch anyway.
Posts: 179
Molotovs are 50% cheaper to trow and OKW gets side teching in new patch anyway.
Hey, does the OKW need a specific tech upgrade to be able to throw Molotovs and another specific tech upgrade to fire a faust? no
At the very least, Soviet's At grenade and molotovs should be merged into a 250 Manpower, 20 Fuel Upgrade, and possibly add a 3rd tech to fill the empty HQ upgrade space requiring T4 called Soviet Industry that boosts vehicle production in the late game.
Posts: 609
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
And you need more than just one regular grenade to clear buildings
Not really, if you aim at the windows were the models are shooting from. You can 1 shot squads that clump into 4/5 windows.
Posts: 1930
Not really, if you aim at the windows were the models are shooting from. You can 1 shot squads that clump into 4/5 windows.
most decent player can easily dodge a frag grenade.
the incendiary grenade's biggest advantages is that it deny the use of the building.
Posts: 954
Free panzerfuast, rifle nade, flame grenade laugh at cons
Posts: 247
I think the upgrade should cost less fuel. It isn't that expensive but not often worth pushing back AT nades/t70 rush/SU76 to get.
Posts: 1890 | Subs: 1
Even if they don't outright kill a HMG then you force it to reposition, which in the context of a larger assault can be the difference between winning and losing the engagement. If you tech them early and catch an Ostheer player trying to aggressively garrison a MG42 early on then it can be an early GG :3
Posts: 3103 | Subs: 1
Posts: 673
1. Speed of throwing.
2. Range of throwing.
Both of this things just making using that grenade too dangerous for your conscripts, cos they very often dying under fire, while trying to throw Molotov + it's very easy to dodge that grenade. Even MG-42 can move out of buidling before it will hit the ground.
I think, that here is 2 ways:
1. Improve both of those Molotovs stats - range and speed of throwing, but increase greande cost to 20-25 ammo.
or
2. Change Molotovs to normal grenades. Seriously, Molotovs weren't stock soviet grenade, specially in late war. There were a lot of normal grenades like RGD-33 or RG-42. Molotovs mostly used as weapons by partisan groups or at most early stages of war, when were problems with logistic and getting normal weapons to frontline soldiers.
Anyway, something should be done about molotovs, really. Those are worst grenades in game, and with them equiped worst soldiers in game. And excuse that "it's cheap, everything OK" doesn't work. I don't need cheap but useless shit. I want units and their abilities perform effectively. Molotovs don't do it right now.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
most decent player can easily dodge a frag grenade.
the incendiary grenade's biggest advantages is that it deny the use of the building.
True, that's why you should observe how your opponent reacts to your first grenade. If he dodges, throw it at doors. Although i was talking about something different (the claim that you can't clear a building with a single regular nade)
Posts: 1063
Molotovs suck just because of 2 things:
1. Speed of throwing.
2. Range of throwing.
Both of this things just making using that grenade too dangerous for your conscripts, cos they very often dying under fire, while trying to throw Molotov + it's very easy to dodge that grenade. Even MG-42 can move out of buidling before it will hit the ground.
I think, that here is 2 ways:
1. Improve both of those Molotovs stats - range and speed of throwing, but increase greande cost to 20-25 ammo.
or
2. Change Molotovs to normal grenades. Seriously, Molotovs weren't stock soviet grenade, specially in late war. There were a lot of normal grenades like RGD-33 or RG-42. Molotovs mostly used as weapons by partisan groups or at most early stages of war, when were problems with logistic and getting normal weapons to frontline soldiers.
Anyway, something should be done about molotovs, really. Those are worst grenades in game, and with them equiped worst soldiers in game. And excuse that "it's cheap, everything OK" doesn't work. I don't need cheap but useless shit. I want units and their abilities perform effectively. Molotovs don't do it right now.
And about cheapness of Mollies, how about inf nade, same price, way better power. I don't understand the logic behind Mollies either, it's not Dota when abilities are balanced by casting time, give it proper animation and adjust the cost plz.
Posts: 54
Posts: 5279
roll into same tech as AT nade (20fu 2501 mp as mentioned)
make moli con vet 1 ability muni free with current stats! (loooong ass animation and short range)
add a side grade that allows for more pop/MP income that (40fu 200mp)
Livestreams
802 | |||||
19 | |||||
2 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.599215.736+14
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1106614.643+7
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Replay highlight
- cblanco ★
- 보드카 중대
- VonManteuffel
- Heartless Jäger
Board Info
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Welcome our newest member, Modarov
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM