Asymmetrical gamemodes

New topic

New Reply

Posts: 395

I wish there were asymmetrical game modes in CoH 2. Frontline mode from Men of War is my goto example in my head.

I think an attacker/defender game mode would really spice this game up. There could be a 3v4 where the 3 have good defensive positions. Or we could have a classic weakened defender with extra time to prepare.

I bought vCoH on January 3rd, 2007.
Still missing the days of vCoH 1.71. It had it's issues, like paks sniping 57s, and the strafe didn't work, but overall, it was probably the most balanced time in CoH history.

OF ruined that. CoH 2 is....balanced in a nasty way. Everyone has an equal stockpile of gamebreaking bullshit. USA is full of early game BS while the OKW doesn't get its BS until late game. It's just a question of how badly you exploit the faction's shit and how quickly, after a patch, you discover the gaping holes of bullshit Relic leaves. But either way, it's all BS. The only "BS" in vCoH that was gamechanging was the fast m8 vs a bunker.

Multi Quote

Posts: 21

Sounds like a good idea +1

Posts: 320

I completely agree, an attack and defend for fun mode would be great.

Playercard of MarkedRaptor

	2v2: P	streak: + 2
	2v2: P	streak: + 2
	2v2: P	streak: + 1
	2v2: P	streak: + 7

Multi Quote

Posts: 1153 | Subs: 1

Heyyyy make a mod man!

If I had the time and the knowledge of how code works, I would do that.
Alas, I have neither.

Posts: 1124

Attack and defend would be awesome. Attackers having more MP and more income. Defenders having less

Posts: 75

Frontline would an awesome gamemode for Relic to put into the game!

Posts: 875 | Subs: 2

2 Apr 2016, 21:37 PMtheblitz6794

I think an attacker/defender game mode would really spice this game up. There could be a 3v4 where the 3 have good defensive positions. Or we could have a classic weakened defender with extra time to prepare.

Posts: 484

Played MoH: Pacific Assault online way back,and it had a mechanic that took me by surprise at first but which made perfect sense; in effect only the attacking side could cap points. This meant that the defending Japanese side would first fight at the outermost defences, and as the match proceeded, would get pushed back to inner defences. The question was whether they could cost the attackers enough tickets that the assault lost momentum and failed.

While that doesn't map to CoH's use of points exactly, I've always thought it was an interesting and clever idea.

“Disobedience, in the eyes of any one who has read history, is man's original virtue. It is through disobedience that progress has been made, through disobedience and through rebellion.”
― Oscar Wilde

Multi Quote