Which only proves his point of it being underused.
But not his point of not been a bad ability or deserving a nerf.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
Which only proves his point of it being underused.
Posts: 254
But not his point of not been a bad ability or deserving a nerf.
Posts: 245
But not his point of not been a bad ability or deserving a nerf.
Posts: 8154 | Subs: 2
it wasn't bad it won early engagements because RE's were absolute garbage in combat before update. arguably the worse. Where as in a 1v1 vs Spios for example if u were in cover u could drop a volley on it and win that engagement and force a retreat. but 35 is too much I would agree but with RE being buffed it does deserve to cost more than it did.
2 | |||||
1 | |||||
1 |