Cromwell too good for the cost
19 Dec 2015, 23:03 PM
#41
Posts: 836 | Subs: 5
It's something that should get adjusted once ukf receives other buffs. Currently the most (and really only) viable brit play relies on the quick Cromwell.
 | Playercard of Dusty | |||||||||||||||
|
Devils_Brigade: man captain molo why dont you just buy and m3 drive that around instead of playing coh
19 Dec 2015, 23:24 PM
#42
Posts: 403
It's 2016 soon and people still eat the bait
My place in the ladder is irrelevant as long as I am matched with opponents of the same rank and play all factions (balance at place 1000+ is no different from balance in top 100 if we consider what I said before the brakets) so I don't care about your assertion which is also irrelevant.
19 Dec 2015, 23:46 PM
#43
Posts: 1930
the only nerf the cromwell should ever take is the gun penetration.
its speed and smaller size is what allow it to remain viable even into the late game against the axis.
The sherman technically have better a better gun, but its size and slower speed doom it to mediocrity.
its speed and smaller size is what allow it to remain viable even into the late game against the axis.
The sherman technically have better a better gun, but its size and slower speed doom it to mediocrity.
20 Dec 2015, 00:05 AM
#44
Posts: 1604 | Subs: 3
Leave my Cromwell alone. I love this unit because I get more kills through crush than with the main gun.
Also the Cromwell is a crutch brits really need in the moment.
In my opinion second best medium tank after the Sherman
Also the Cromwell is a crutch brits really need in the moment.
In my opinion second best medium tank after the Sherman
If you need to know stats of certain unit: http://stat.coh2.hu
Which faction is OP and which is UP? Check it out here
Tips for beginners and wannabe pro's
Which faction is OP and which is UP? Check it out here
Tips for beginners and wannabe pro's
20 Dec 2015, 00:39 AM
#45
Posts: 253
Cmon guys what is wrong with the Cromwell.
How can anyone get mad at this unit?
How can anyone get mad at this unit?
20 Dec 2015, 01:35 AM
#46
Posts: 232
Guess this is the next nerf crusade then. By my reckoning the Cromwell and the Vickers are the only two stock brit units that haven't been nerfed one way or another since launch.
I've never really got much out of the Cromwell personally. Always felt a bit random if a shot would land or not against inf, and has to run from volks with shrecks. Never cared much for crush as a mechanic either.
I've never really got much out of the Cromwell personally. Always felt a bit random if a shot would land or not against inf, and has to run from volks with shrecks. Never cared much for crush as a mechanic either.
20 Dec 2015, 03:43 AM
#47
1 
Posts: 2885
Problem:
- As fast as the kubel
- Bounces panther peanuts as if there is no tomorrow
- Pooped out Too early
Solution:
- Increase the cost to 350/125
You know that panther has 240 pen while cromwell has 160 armor? So even if it had 1.5x more armor it would still get penetrated 100% of times. Just stop making those stupid threads.
20 Dec 2015, 12:31 PM
#48
Posts: 632 | Subs: 1
I'm not even saying its armor/penetration/speed/whatever should be nerfed, it's totally alright where it is, performance-wise. But a slightly higher fuel cost would be appropriate, because it's currently more cost effective than most other medium tanks.
That said, I agree that Brits have quite a few other problems at the moment, and those should obviously be fixed at the same time.
That said, I agree that Brits have quite a few other problems at the moment, and those should obviously be fixed at the same time.
New to the modding forums? Have a look at our Rules, Tools and Tutorials.
And if you want to get your hands dirty, check the Modders' Job Board.
And if you want to get your hands dirty, check the Modders' Job Board.
20 Dec 2015, 22:40 PM
#49
Posts: 168
What a blatant lie.The Cromwell is perfect.
''Shots bounce'', maybe L2Flank ? As if t34/76 don't have to flank EVERY TIME.
Brit emplacements are already nerfed to the ground, now you want to ruin tanks too?
''Shots bounce'', maybe L2Flank ? As if t34/76 don't have to flank EVERY TIME.
Brit emplacements are already nerfed to the ground, now you want to ruin tanks too?
Of coursh
21 Dec 2015, 01:44 AM
#50
Posts: 665
It's something that should get adjusted once ukf receives other buffs. Currently the most (and really only) viable brit play relies on the quick Cromwell.
Very true. I always find myself thinking ''maybe I should get a BOFORS or an AEC?'' then decide that these units are so decidedly mediocre that manning it up until I can get a Cromwell for the shock value is a way better use of my fuel.
If the Cromwell needs any change in its timing or performance, it needs to come along a buff to UKF, especially their mid-game.
21 Dec 2015, 02:31 AM
#51
Posts: 1484
Let's not jump to conclusion and nerf the British even more now. The unit is perfectly fine for the price and performance.
| Playercard of WingZero | |||||||||||||||
|
21 Dec 2015, 16:55 PM
#52
Posts: 728
Cromwell is fine.
21 Dec 2015, 19:26 PM
#53
Posts: 468
p4 should have same penetration as cromwell. Short dick sherman has more penetration than the long barreled p4. Which makes no goddamn sense.
Oh yeah! MG42 has armor penetration rounds with 7.92mm rounds but .50CAL can't penetrate vehicles with 12.7mm rounds that were designed to rip planes and vehicles to shreds. Same old story...
They're trying to create balance... not realism. Otherwise, we know which tank, which MG, which mortar is superior.
| Playercard of BeRyan | |||||||||||||||
|
21 Dec 2015, 19:51 PM
#54
Posts: 297
dunno, played with, played agains, it seemed k if not slighly under pz4, but for the cost its supposed to be like that
1 user is browsing this thread:
1 guest
Livestreams
 |
|
|
18 | ||
 |
|
|
14 | ||
 |
|
|
22 | ||
|
|
|
|
20 | ||
|
|
|
|
8 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
|
|
|
|
3 | ||
 |
|
|
1 | ||
|
|
|
|
1 |
Ladders Top 10
-
#Steam AliasWL%Streak
- 1.831222.789+37
- 2.600215.736+15
- 3.34957.860+14
- 4.1107614.643+8
- 5.305114.728+1
- 6.916405.693-2
- 7.273108.717+24
- 8.722440.621+4
- 9.1041674.607-2
- 10.17146.788+1
Data provided by
Relic Entertainment
Relic Entertainment
Replay highlight
VS
-
cblanco ★ -
보드카 중대
-
VonManteuffel -
Heartless Jäger
Einhoven Country
Honor it
9
Download
1234
Board Info
802 users are online:
802 guests
0 post in the last 24h
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
8 posts in the last week
37 posts in the last month
Registered members: 49101
Welcome our newest member, Dorca477
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM
Welcome our newest member, Dorca477
Most online: 2043 users on 29 Oct 2023, 01:04 AM